News
North officials put auction of painting on hold
![]() "Afghans," a painting by the Russian artist Alexandre Iacovieff, could fetch up to $2 million if auctioned. The painting hung in the auditorium at North's Community School until last week.
Top Headlines Smith, a grandson of the family who donated the Russian masterpiece that sat unnoticed for years on the wall of Community School until it was learned last week that it may be worth more than $1 million, asked school officials Monday night to not adopt a "gold-rush mentality" and postpone sale of the work. His request was honored. School officials said they will hold off discussing selling the painting until relatives of the donors had the opportunity to talk about the situation. Smith's grandparents, William Charles and Edith Whiting Thompson, donated the painting to the town around 1950. He said his plea was being made on behalf of the family, including his mother and two uncles. "This is a reflection of a kind of gold-rush mentality in my family's opinion. The rush to attempt to sell this thing is extremely short-sighted," Smith said. "I think it would be in the best interest of this board to postpone a decision until we can get our arms around this thing and come up with a best course of action." Smith said he was surprised to read about the painting in Saturday's The Sun Chronicle and wished that his family had been contacted before the painting was removed. "I am dismayed the painting was removed from the school where my grandfather hung it over five decades ago," Smith said. "To my family, this is a gift of art. This is a gift of culture and it managed to escape harm for 55 years. It should not have been taken down from the wall where my grandfather hung it." The painting was removed from the Community School auditorium last week after school officials discovered the painting's value. It is currently in the hands of Sotheby's auction house of New York, which has agreed to store and insure the artwork until the town decides what to do with it. The 7-foot by 10-foot painting by artist Alexandre Iacovleff depicts Afghan tribesman resting on a hillside. Titled "Afghans" it was recently appraised at $600,000 to $800,000 by Sotheby's auction house of New York. The painting could sell for far more if the town decides to auction it off - one of Iacovleff's paintings recently sold for $2 million. Given those facts, school committee Chairman David Manoogian said there was little choice but to take it down. "It was removed for the purposes of safeguarding the painting. We had no means to insure it," Manoogian said. So far, no documentation of the donation has been found in town records. School Superintendent Richard Smith said school committee minutes from 1937 to 1965 have been poured over and no mention of the painting has been discovered. The school department was just starting its research into the painting when he was contacted by the donor family. "My perception is that you have a misperception about how well known it was that the Thompson Smith family was the donor of that painting. It was not so obvious within the community as you may believe," Superintendent Smith said. Gregory Smith was able to shed some more light onto the donation, which is remembered well by members of his family. His grandfather, William Charles Thompson had a long history in the art world, working for the Vose Gallery in Boston. Thompson, the nephew of Robert Vose, knew Iacovleff personally and oversaw the sale of the artist's paintings after his death. "His widow was pleased to know the painting hung in a public place," Smith said. "My grandfather chose that location specifically and after receiving approval, hung it there himself with the help of a friend." Selectmen Chairman John Rhyno also urged the school department to proceed slowly with any plans to sell the artwork. "It may come to the point that we find the best solution is to sell the painting but I would like the blessing of the family first," he said. "I don't want anyone to feel if they donate something to the town, we will turn around and sell it." After speaking with Gregory Smith, school committee members agreed to appoint a subcommittee to discuss the future of the painting with the donor family. It is expected that a decision will be made at the board's March meeting. A sale of the painting would require a vote from both the school committee and selectmen. Superintendent Smith suggested that any money made from the sale of the painting could be used to perhaps buy another piece of art for the auditorium and set up a scholarship fund for graduating North Attleboro High School students majoring in the arts. Meanwhile, the school committee offered its thanks to Richard Paynton, the art enthusiast who brought the painting's value to the board's attention. Paynton researched the painting after seeing it on the wall while attending a Living Waters Church service in the Community School auditorium. "I do enjoy artwork and I explored a little on the artist," Paynton said. "It was kind of shocking because this was a level of painting you wouldn't typically find except in a major gallery or private collection." Paynton said he discussed with his wife Krista whether he should tell the town of the painting's value and ultimately decided to contact the school committee chairman. "What if something happened like the roof leaked or it fell on the floor?" Paynton asked. "It concerned me because it is an extremely valuable piece of art that was completely unprotected. And if I could find out about it then anyone can."
Post Your Comments John wrote on Feb 6, 2007 6:00 PM: " Apparently the school authorities don't have too much confidence in the security at our schools. It's ironic that they feel that the schools are not safe for paintings, but safe for our kids. What's the more valuable asset? Also does the Town have a written contract with Sotheby's? If so, what does it say? How much is the insurance coverage? Did the Town get any estimates before concluding that insurance would be unaffordable? Will Sotheby's bill the Town for storage, maintenance and insurance on the painting if the Town takes it back? These are important issues that the Town should clear up soon. " Mark wrote on Feb 6, 2007 4:58 PM: " I seem to recall some rare books at the Richards Memorial Library. Maybe we should sell all those as well. I bet the town could get quite a bit of money for the Woodcock Garrison House and the Little Red School House as well… " K.L. wrote on Feb 6, 2007 2:55 PM: " Just want to point out that someone "pored" over the minutes, not "poured."
This is a compelling story; I'll be following it. " John wrote on Feb 6, 2007 2:38 PM: " The family should consider getting a Temporary Restraining Order and Injunction to prevent the Town from selling the painting until its provenance is clarified. School Superintendent Richard Smith admits that "school committee minutes from 1937 to 1965 have been poured over and no mention of the painting has been discovered." So how can the Town claim rightful ownership? For all we know, the donor's intent may have been that the painting be returned to his heirs if the Town didn't want it anymore. In any event, the Town and the family should keep on searching for the missing legal document transfering ownership and/or possession of the painting to the Town. " Use it or lose it wrote on Feb 6, 2007 2:25 PM: " I concur that the painting should be returned to the family should the school no longer wish to display it. Obviously the painting was donated as a cultural gift to the community, to be displayed and enjoyed, not divvied up and sold to the highest bidder like Jesus' garments after his crucifixion. The Thompsons must have had a much higher regard for the Townspeople than have the current Town Fathers. What an embarrassing lack of class. " Gigi wrote on Feb 6, 2007 1:20 PM: " I think the town should return the painting to the family if the family has any interest in owning it. I would certainly prefer that a donated piece of art created by my grandfather or any other family member be returned to my family rather than be sold to the highest bidder. That is just plan common sense and fairness. The school and town obviously don't have any strong ties to it aside from seeing it as a colorful object on a bleak wall, and were quick to bring it to an auction house to find the value once interest was shown...how crude. " Jerry wrote on Feb 6, 2007 1:08 PM: " It would be interesting to see who owns it. Was the painting donated to the town or to the children of North Attleborough?
This painting should be loaned to a museum. I'm not sure how one gets money from loaning to an art gallery as Lynn suggests " John wrote on Feb 6, 2007 12:14 PM: " I say sell the painting. Now that its worth is known it will become a target for theft and or vandalism. A high quality print can be made and displayed at the school...no one will be able to tell the difference. " Lynn wrote on Feb 6, 2007 11:26 AM: " How about loaning out the painting to a major art gallery and use the proceeds to start a scholarship fund for art students. The painting will still be owned by the school, many art lovers can view it, and those future artists can benefit from it with a scholarship in the name of the family who donated it. " Tom wrote on Feb 6, 2007 11:23 AM: " Remind me not to donate anything to the town. They'll just turn around and sell it.
My guess is if the family knew it would be sold they would have kept the money in the family. " Let's not sell out... wrote on Feb 6, 2007 9:12 AM: " The town should be proud of this treasure. If the cost of insurance and security will be more than we can afford perhaps a long term loan to the MFA can be arranged?
" or
|