News
Eating on $21 a week means a smaller, less diverse menu
Top Headlines Good luck, Jim, you'll need it. You got us thinking about how we'd do the same. McGovern, D-Worcester, will be on a subsistence diet all this week as he and U.S. Rep. Jo Ann Emerson attempt to live on $3 a day for food. They each know this is temporary. But there are many neighbors among us who are trying to stretch $21, the food stamp average, to do just this because they have to. And when one week is done, another looms. And another and another. Well, we went shopping and the result was a menu of meal portions far smaller than customary American expectation, and far less diverse than what we might wish. (Can we guess, Jim, that you'll be heading to your favorite Washington eatery for filet mignon when your fast - because that's just about what it is - is completed?) We were able to pinch out a plan, using armloads of seasonal vegetables and hunting down specials. We did not itemize for this article the cost of each purchase since there will be fluctuations from week to week, and from product to product. The lawmakers say they will be trying to make ends meet to demonstrate what they contend is insufficient aid poor families receive in the form of food stamps. We'll be watching - and listening for the sound of stomachs grumbling, as ours were. We took $84 to a Stop & Shop to see what we could amass for fictional parents with two young children. Rent, utilities, transportation and out-of-pocket payment for two prescriptions already decimate their budget. Our aim was to stretch each food dollar by buying store brands where possible, in bulk, using coupons and specials, and preparing meals from scratch, factoring in government nutrition recommendations and eliminating the empty calories of junk-food snacks and sodas. A poor diet may dampen hunger pangs, but it fails to support overall health and help prevent illnesses and weight gain associated with a high-calorie, low nutrition diet, which is also a hazard to fetal development. For guidance, we consulted the U.S. Food Pyramid that recommends daily consumption of grains, vegetables, fruits, milk products, and items from the category composed of meats, beans, poultry, fish, dry beans, eggs, and nuts, all while avoiding unhealthy fats, high sugar and sodium content. We brainstormed recipe ideas with family and friends, and reviewed sample menus provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Now we don't know what Jim McGovern is planning, but we immediately pitched into our cart a large container of oatmeal - an excellent source of dietary fiber, iron, and B vitamins - peanut butter, tortillas, a thrift pack of chicken, two pounds of hamburger, eggs, two loaves of whole wheat bread, apples, oranges, spinach, carrots, green peppers, onions, cottage cheese, a gallon of milk and lasagna pasta, plus a few other incidentals. The total? We kept adding and discarding until reaching $84 plus a few pocket pennies. Nope, we did not even cast a glance at the Ring-Dings. Or the diet Pepsi. We put back the strawberries, soy sauce and sherbet. But we did give in to an excellent special on macaroni and cheese in a box. We shopped, presuming family members would carry lunches, use portion restraint, consume substantial amounts of salad and fresh fruit, and drink tap water at most meals. Foundations of our week were the chicken, roasted and distributed in soft tacos with vegetables, then on a dinner salad, then in a vegetable stir-fry, and a two-dinner lasagna of hamburger and cottage cheese with plenty of shredded carrots and spinach as extenders. Breakfasts featured oatmeal with banana, raisins and milk, or French toast. Lunch was a peanut butter sandwich or baloney, apple and carrot sticks and a cup of reconstituted soup. When we mentioned to other shoppers our intentions, they rolled their eyes: $84 doesn't go far. But you already know that. Sometimes you just need to think outside the box. For instance, you can devise dinner out of sautéed hamburger, generous equal portions of onion and green pepper and frozen mixed vegetables served over bow-tie pasta. Or, toss diced garlic and grated ginger with green beans, carrots and mushrooms and vegetable oil and a box of tofu cut into cubes. Sauté and serve over plenty of brown rice purchased in bulk. McGovern and Emerson co-chair the hunger caucus in the House. They have filed a bill to raise spending on nutrition programs by $20 billion over five years. The bill would raise the asset level for eligibility for food stamps and improve the benefit. We've discovered - and Jim McGovern may also - that it's possible, just barely, to live on $3 a day for food. But it's a wearisome challenge in an everchanging landscape of seasonal availabilities and sales. An estimated 35.1 million Americans are "food insecure" - meaning their access to enough food is limited by a lack of money and other resources, according to Second Harvest, the nation's food bank network. We got a bitter taste of that armed with only $84 to feed four people - still famished, we'd guess - for one week.
Post Your Comments VB MASS wrote on May 15, 2007 10:43 PM: " TRY LIVING ON 28$ A MONTH " Mama Sass wrote on May 15, 2007 7:58 PM: " Austin, law student, says he lives on $150 a month for food. Now try $84. " pd wrote on May 15, 2007 7:46 PM: " Are there not enough work houses for the poor to work in, if they die at least they will then decrease the surplus population... paraphrase of Dickens Christmas Carol. I agree with very little of our congressman's positions but this is one, this important one, he has right. " Tired of McGovern wrote on May 15, 2007 5:08 PM: " To LD, of course I don't know the congressman and of course I only know what I read, which is what his people want me to read. What I've read is that he has been an ineffectual congressman. We have had the needy as long as we've had a country. So where has the sainted congressman been all this time? " pleaseSteve wrote on May 15, 2007 4:07 PM: " LD, Not a stunt? If it was not a stunt it wouldn't be in the paper would it? Are you really that gulible? Seriously you have to be a public employee for a retired one. Pretending to be poor and being poor are too different things ,whats next camping out on the common to see how the homeless live?Being compasionate is an admirable quality but it means jack squat to the ppl in need. Get them better paying jobs ,less taxes you know the drill. " pleaseSteve wrote on May 15, 2007 3:23 PM: " The guy is a tool.Flat tax us and we can all eat well. " LD wrote on May 15, 2007 3:07 PM: " To Tired of McGovern, gee, do you know for a fact this is a stunt? All you people are quick to say it's a publicity stunt, to get votes, yada, yada, yada, complain, complain, complain. I'll bet none of you know him personally. Not to mention, you only see what's written in print. You're just basing your complaints based on what you read. It's sad. " LD wrote on May 15, 2007 2:50 PM: " "To The Moderator", it's not a personal attack, it's a fact. You need to get the two straight. " Do they wrote on May 15, 2007 1:12 PM: " Do the bulk stores like Cosco and BJs accept food stamps? " minority wrote on May 15, 2007 1:09 PM: " I think it’s great that a politician is at least making an effort to see what it’s like to eat with only food stamps. More people should give it a shot.
My questions are: Why does this article assume that the food stamps are the only source for buying food? Is the article implying that it’s ok to not work and live completely off the government programs – and that the government (working taxpayers) should give these families more?
I of all people know how expensive it is to live in MA, but I also believe people should take responsibility for themselves (when possible) and not completely depend on the money that is taken out of peoples’ hard earned check every week. How is it fair to people who work hard and barely scrape by? It's like taking the food they worked for off their tables, and putting it on someone else’s.
" Devil's Advocate wrote on May 15, 2007 12:56 PM: " I think it’s great that a politician is at least making an effort to see what it’s like to eat with only food stamps. More people should give it a shot.
My questions are: Why does this article assume that the food stamps are the only source for buying food? Is the article implying that it’s ok to not work and live completely off the government programs – and that the government (working taxpayers) should give these families more?
I of all people know how expensive it is to live in MA, but I also believe people should take responsibility for themselves (when possible) and not completely depend on the money that is taken out of peoples’ hard earned check every week. How is it fair to people who work hard and barely scrape by? It's like taking the food they worked for off their tables, and putting it on someone else's.
" Huh? wrote on May 15, 2007 11:35 AM: " The limo-liberal congressman wants to give more money for food? Why not fund the program by removing price supports for farmers and dairy producers. For some reason farmers, some of them huge corporate enterprises, are being paid not to grow certain products. And then we import gluten ( a plant protein) from China? " To the moderator wrote on May 15, 2007 11:18 AM: " I thought personal attacks, such as questioning one's ability to read, were not allowed. Please read "LD"'s comment. " This is news? wrote on May 15, 2007 11:11 AM: " The SC and Congressman McGovern have just realized that food is expensive and there are people, maybe your neighbors, out there struggling to make ends meet? The election is more than a year away. Shouldn't the SC editorial board be saving this for 2008? " Tired of McGovern wrote on May 15, 2007 11:05 AM: " To LD, I read the article. I read the other article, I read the article last week about McGovern and his stunt. And that's what it is, another liberal showing how much he cares. I agree with Jane, let hin give up his big salary for a month and his congressional benefits. That would be a sacrifice. " Agreed wrote on May 15, 2007 10:29 AM: " The SC coverage is too much. McGovern rarely does anything to help the Attleboro area but his name is in the paper almost everyday. I also liked yesterday's piece that told us how much money he has for his campaign. Its nice the SC is making sure that us common people would have no chance running against him " Tired of McGovern wrote on May 15, 2007 9:47 AM: " Sorry, it shouls have been a week not "weak". " To Austin wrote on May 15, 2007 9:46 AM: " How about not drinking bottled water at all? If you live or go to school in an area where the water is safe to drink?
Also if you read the papers what about coupons? Occasionally you can treat yourself to a name brand item for less than the generic or store brand. " OP! wrote on May 15, 2007 9:37 AM: " Austin! Remember your comment, and remember it well! When someone walk's into your office that's on foodstamps and need's legal representation , and your rate is $150 an hr. the amount you surrived on a month, think back and that person you are looking at. May it be a mirror. " LD wrote on May 15, 2007 9:37 AM: " To Tired of McGovern, You're missing the point, it's not about McGovern, it's about a person trying to live on what other's live on to prove a point. Learn to read and comprehend an article why don't you. " Jane. wrote on May 15, 2007 9:16 AM: " That's just food. What about all the other everyday items. And we have fuel for the car, insuance, rent, school stuff for the kid's. Health insurance or co-payment's. I think they should have a show where the fat cat's in Goverment switch role's for a month not a meer week, with someone on wellfare or minimum wage, with school age kid's of course. I'll bet $$$$$ not one of them would last. They would'nt know how to say no to a crying child and or can't afford it! " Tired of McGovern wrote on May 15, 2007 8:21 AM: " I get so tired of the SC's hero worship of liberal politicians. If McGovern was switching to a cheaper toilet paper for a weak, would it be front page news? " Austin wrote on May 15, 2007 8:05 AM: " As a law student, I make it on $150/month easily: Chicken Kiev, Mac & Cheese, Pizza, Spaghetti, Chili, Taco's, & an occassional steak.
Look at the meals you're preparing; if it has alot of ingredients, make something else: something less expensive.
Drink off-brand bottled water, & you'll see the $$'s drop. With careful planning & THINKING, it IS possible to grocery shop on 150/month. " or
|