34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

City mulls wind power to cut costs




ATTLEBORO - It may turn out to be pie in the sky, but Mayor Kevin Dumas is looking at wind power to help cut one of the city's biggest electric bills.

With the departments of water and wastewater spending $1 million a year for electricity to run the 24-hour, 365-day operations, he's eager to consider the use of wind turbines to help reduce the hefty costs.

"It's going to be interesting. I'm excited about looking at it," the mayor said. "Even if it doesn't turn out to be viable in the end."

But Dumas said the possible advantages are too big to ignore.

"It could be very advantageous even if we need some upfront money," he said. Dumas is hoping to win a grant from the state to help pay for a turbine if it's determined to be a feasible idea.

He said in some cases wind turbines pay for themselves in a year. After that, a turbine would save the city money making it available to spend on other services.

Dumas has assigned the research task to Paul Kennedy, the city's superintendent of wastewater.

One of the biggest questions to be answered is whether the city has enough wind to make a wind turbine pay.

Wind turbines have been in the news a lot lately.

Officials in North Attleboro are considering the use of wind power for their town. Turbines are being considered for Sunrise Hill in World War I Memorial Park.

Meanwhile, a proposal to study the feasibility of wind power in Rehoboth was rejected by town meeting voters because of the cost.

But wind turbines have been installed in coastal towns such as Hull and Bourne.

Hull has two, one of which it uses to power street lights and traffic signals.

In Bourne a wind turbine has been built at the Massachusetts Maritime Academy. According to the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative there are 129 wind power projects being considered around the state and many are from municipalities.

GEORGE W. RHODES can be reached at 508-236-0432 or at grhodes@thesunchronicle.com.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » No comments posted. « Hide Comments

ToCynic wrote on May 21, 2007 2:35 PM:

" The town has no problem getting rid of "treasures" for short term gain. Do you really want to dredge up the painting issue? "

Cheryl wrote on May 21, 2007 12:46 PM:

" Ides Hill is 230Ft in elevation and is right next to the new industrial park.(low transmission losses) The town already has two water tanks there. Just add a bunch of windmills.(I say paint them like daisies or black-eyed Susans) Let's mix electrictiy and water. No, really I'm not kidding. "

kent beuchert wrote on May 21, 2007 12:41 PM:

" No wind turbine ever paid for itself in a year, at least not unless 95% was paid for by someone else. That statement alone tells me this mayor must have a large extended family that votes as a block and keeps him in office. This is merely a small town mayor looking for state welfare. Wind is a very stupid way to produce small amounts of unreliable, uncontrollable electricity. They also screw up the grid, require more fossil fuel be burned and raise everyone's rates. Do the math, mayor. I estimate that your 1 million dollar electric bill paid for aound 7 million kilowatt hours of juice. You are using around 800 kilowatts of power, on average. The US average for onshore windmills shows a load capacity of merely 20%, meaning that a 1.5MW turbine actually can only produce 3/10th MW, or 300 kilowatts. You will need 3 windmills, at a total cost around $8 million dollars. You also have to finance the turbines, at 5% that's $600,000 per year in finance charges plus principle charges of $400,000 per year (turbines last 20 years), or $1 million, the same thing you are paying now, except that there are a lot more costs involved in owning your own turbine - insurance and maintenance are two. And you will have to sell probably most of your power at low rates and buy during peak demand at very high rates. When the turbine breaks down forget it. "

Kevin h. wrote on May 21, 2007 12:28 PM:

" Sunrise hill is about 180Ft in elevation, the landfill is about 250Ft, and the big hill near the YMCA is about 370Ft in height. (thanks Google Earth) "

kevin h. wrote on May 21, 2007 11:56 AM:

" Windmills aren't exactly cheap and easy. Therefore maximizing the energy output is paramount. Finding the best location has everything to do with available wind power. You do want return on investment after all. "

Cynic wrote on May 21, 2007 10:36 AM:

" Why would North Attleborough give up one of it's treasures for short term gain. I'm speaking of Sunrise Hill. Use the land fill, the uncapped part. Better than a golf course. There is no meteorogical evidence that there is more wind at the WWI park than the land fill. Or maybe they could put some at at the composting area. "

Jake wrote on May 21, 2007 9:15 AM:

" Very progressive!!! Thanks Mayor Dumas - "

Skeptic wrote on May 21, 2007 8:22 AM:

" The leaders of North Attleborough and Attleboro are moving sort of in the right direction. However in North Attleborough the turbines should be at the land fill. Using some of the 50 acres they want to give away to the golf course they could put turbines where there is not land fill. Even the capped area could support shallow anchor (ie concrete pads) turbines. It would be a better return to have clean energy rather than the eco nightmare of another golf course. The town squandered years of free energy from the methane off the landfill. "


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
 or