News
Court rejects homes claim
Top Headlines The town has contended that housing at the center should be counted toward its affordable housing stock, which would push it above the state goal of communities having at least 10 percent of housing considered affordable. Reaching that target gives communities the ability to have more say and even reject Chapter 40B affordable housing projects that otherwise can bypass local zoning and planning boards. West Wrentham Village, a 30-unit affordable housing project planned off West Street that ignited strong protest from residents in the west end, was denied by the zoning board of appeals on the stance the town met the state goal. The developer subsequently appealed to the state Housing Appeals Committee. The state Appeals Court found in favor of the state committee in the June 27 decision, upholding an order by the committee for the town to adhere to the 40B law for West Wrentham Village and hear the merits of that application. The court did not explicitly render a finding on whether the center's housing can be included in the town's affordable housing, but the decision stated, "Housing provided to members of institutional communities may be affordable, but it is not ordinarily available to members of the community at large." Wrentham has 147 units considered affordable, or about 5 percent of its housing stock, and would have reached about 12 percent affordable if the developmental center's units were counted. There are about 300 mentally disabled residents at the center. State regulations had appeared to indicate that developmental center housing couldn't be counted as affordable, but town representatives said the area was murky and wanted to challenge the regulation. And town counsel rendered an opinion the developmental center housing should be considered affordable - something the zoning board relied on in its decisions. The legal action dates back to Aug. 12, 2005 in Superior Court. The appeals case was heard March 13 of this year. "I'm sure it will be something to be talked about," Selectman John Zizza said of the court decision and his board's next step. "No one can build 40Bs in Wrentham" if the town wins its legal battle, Zizza said. Town Administrator Jack McFeeley said there probably are several options selectmen now would want to consider. Besides West Wrentham Village, the town has faced three other 40B projects in recent years, with the zoning board approving two: a 104-unit project off Route 140 near the Franklin line that is being appealed by an abutter, and a smaller one, Maplewood Village, close to that site and which has stalled. The most recent is a 200-unit apartment complex planned off Route 1A that would be by far the largest housing complex in town. To be eligible for the state 40B affordable housing law, at least 25 percent of units must be affordable, and the latest developer plans that. However, all units in such an apartment complex, not just the affordable units, are included in a community's affordable housing tally. That differs from condominiums.
Post Your Comments one who knows wrote on Jul 6, 2007 10:51 PM: " The BOS have the ultimate responsibility for all litigation the Town. They manage the legal budget! The BOS were very much involved in the whole West Wrentham Village project, they also approve the EOCD Housing Production Plan that was sent in, and the yearly update of newly created affordable housing, which was based on the assumption that WDC housing some how met the the very black & white definitions that now three appellate bodies have said they don't. Oh yes the ZBA is appointed by the BOS they are the proxies for the Board in deciding these matters. " one who knows wrote on Jul 6, 2007 7:31 PM: " Take a look at https://www.masshousing.com/portal/server.pt
http://www.chapa.org/40b_fact.html
http://www.mass.gov/dhcd/regulations/effect.htm
http://www.mass.gov/dhcd/components/SCP/ch40B/default.htm
Consistency with Local Needs:
The general principle governing hearings before the local board and the Housing Appeals Committee is that all local restrictions, as applied to the proposed affordable housing, be "consistent with local needs." General Laws c. 40B, § 20 defines consistency with local needs as being reasonable in view of the need for low and moderate income housing balanced against health, safety, environmental, design, open space, and other local concerns. If less than ten percent of municipality's total housing units are subsidized low and moderate income housing units, there is a presumption that there is a substantial housing need which outweighs local concerns. See 760 CMR 31.07(1)(e); Board of Appeals of Hanover v. H.A.C., 363 Mass. 339, 367, 294 N.E.2d 393, 413 (1973).
" WrenthamResident wrote on Jul 6, 2007 6:20 PM: " Put in a large 55+ development with 25% affordable housing. Great for seniors, no punk kids, problem solved. " where's the housing authority? wrote on Jul 6, 2007 6:16 PM: " the ZBA made the 40B decision, not the selectmen. the appeals court's decision was not responsive to the issue. remember, not everyone is eligible for 40B housing anymore than everyone is eligible to live at the developmental center. yet, accidents or disease could impair a person to the extent that they may qualify to live at the devel ctr. 40B as it stands is a farce because the units will revert to regular housing in a certain time period, forcing the town to fall further behind in meeting its 10%. what should have been done was the housing authority should be building its own units that stay permanently in "40B". especially needed are more units for seniors because school and public safety overrides are taxing more and more seniors out of their homes. leave the personalities and finger pointing against certain selectmen for your recall drive. " Anon wrote on Jul 6, 2007 1:26 PM: " "Affordable" is whatever you can afford. And many people think that "the poor" have the right to own their own homes. People do not have the RIGHT to buy a house - you work hard and earn it. " How? wrote on Jul 6, 2007 10:42 AM: " How is "affordable" defined? " just waiting wrote on Jul 6, 2007 10:40 AM: " wrentham will have plenty of affordable housing by 2008. won't be long before 'mortgage city' goes to the banks; they can turn the monster boxes into multifamily dwellings and voila! housing walmart and mcdonald's workers. then i can afford to move in " One who knows wrote on Jul 6, 2007 10:12 AM: " I happen to live in a apartment project that is also 40B qualified, and I can tell you it s not a ghetto. I toyed with the idea f asking her for an apology, but knowing of her arrogance, decided against as it would make her a victim to ask for an apology. The real issue which they don't want to tackle is how much this costing the taxpayers, lets the attorney was paid to give a preposterous opinion, which was embraced, than he is paid by the Town to defend that faulty opinion, not one, not twice but three times and they want to do it again. The Town would have had better odds taking all the money and buying lottery tickets. Oh I forgot Mr. Zizza long held opinion raise taxes force out lower coast housing and than we will have his vision of a Weston where only people like him can live, than he flees to the wilds of Maine. Does the ZBA really think the those in the community that need affordable housing, lets start with Town employees could move into the beds at the WDC. Maybe the ZBA needs to be looked at as well, but as long as its full of WCA members and those that take phone calls from Firth and Zizza that will not happen. " not a townie wrote on Jul 6, 2007 8:49 AM: " snob zoning. Why would wrentham, of all places, want poor people living in there shangri la? " Whao.... wrote on Jul 6, 2007 6:49 AM: " Bring on Jenneifer Firth's ghetto!!!!!! Isn't that what she called it last week? Yes, she described the 40b project as a GHETTO!!!! Bring it on....hahaha. Or, we could have just allowed a little commercial development. " or
|