34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Tax hike foes unite




NORTON - A campaign is under way to defeat the $1.9 million temporary tax increase proposal in the town's Sept. 18 special election, with opponents of the measure arguing that Norton can and should pay for necessary building repairs out of regular tax revenue.

A new group, Voters Against the Debt Exclusion Override, was formed at the end of July and has begun meeting regularly, said John Freeman, a member of the committee.

Freeman agreed to describe the general opinion of the group's members, but stressed that no single individual is licensed to speak for the committee.

"We're against increased taxes," he said. "We all believe there's another way to do it." Town officials have said the repairs can be paid for out of general tax revenue without an override, and Freeman said the committee prefers that approach.

He also said the anti-override committee wants to see the town "make some systemic changes to the way the employees' contracts are handled" in order to save money. Selectwoman Mary Steele, who supports the temporary override of the cap placed on property taxes by the state law known as Proposition 2 1/2, thinks the competing positions offer voters a clear choice. "The reason for the (override) vote," she said, "is for voters to decide if they want the work to be done at the cost of other departments."

"And," she added, "if that's what the voters vote for, that's what we'll do."

Steele and other town officials have pledged to use the extra tax revenue made available during the override's eight-year duration to repair town facilities.

But Freeman said he is concerned that town meeting voters - who get to make the final decision over how to allocate the extra money - will put it elsewhere. "It's whoever shows up, and they're very good at packing those meetings," he said.

In addition to those issues, Freeman voiced a more general distrust of the officials who have made the case for the override and the repairs.

"We're sick of the people that are employed by the town selling fear - and that isn't only the schools; the police and fire do the same thing," he said. "They try to sell fear to the taxpayers to get more money out of them."

Steele strongly disagreed with that characterization. "The town officials are not drumming up fear," she said. "The problems we have in the town buildings now are documented. They are valid problems, and as public officials, we have a responsibility to bring this to the voters and offer them solutions."

The co-chairmen of Voters Against the Debt Exclusion Override are Charlie Campbell and David Davignon. Freeman said the committee has about 30 active members, and they plan to campaign for the measure's defeat using signs, flyers, local media, and direct voter outreach, organized by precinct.

"It's grunt work, a lot of it," he said. "We've got to educate the people, and make them understand the town doesn't really need this, make them understand this could only be the tip of the iceberg."

Still, Freeman declined to predict that the temporary override would be defeated. "I'm never confident, and maybe that's the way I am," he said. "You never know. It ain't over 'til it's over."

Freeman also said the new group has experienced tension with members of the now-dissolved Citizens Opposed to Proposition 2½ Override '07 Committee, which worked to defeat the general override proposals that failed last June and in 2006.

"There's some people being spiteful, or self-serving," he said. "They didn't want to get involved in the group for personal reasons. They're trying to hinder the new group."

But Heather Graf, who was the dissolved group's corresponding secretary, denied that accusation. She and the other officers of the Citizens Opposed to Proposition 2½ Override '07 Committee are not involved with the Voters Against the Debt Exclusion Override group.

"It's important to make clear we're not the same committee," she said. "I wanted to make it very clear that this was a separate entity."

Freeman said Norton residents are welcome to attend Voters Against the Debt Exclusion Override's next meeting, which will take place at 7 p.m. Wednesday in the American Legion Hall, 85 East Main St. They can also telephone Freeman at 774-259-5886.

TED NESI can be reached at tnesi@thesunchronicle.com or 508-236-0434.

 


Connemara wrote on Aug 27, 2007 8:33 PM:

" j&b - it takes $$$$$ to maintain buildings properly. That seems to be something many people in this town can't seem to understand. The mindset in this town seems to be "slap a band-aid on it - we'll worry about it later!" It's more important to save nickels than to properly fund building maintenance - or properly staff the police department. Some people in Norton seem to actually be proud of the fact that the schools have been underfunded for years - to the point where we're now at rock bottom for per pupil spending. That's something to brag about? It's disgusting. I've lived in Norton almost 10 years - and I plan to be here for a long time (we have three kids in Norton schools - our youngest is in first grade). How much did YOU have to pay for your kids to ride the bus? I'll bet you never had to fork over a nickel for a pencil for your kids - you were probably more than happy to let the taxpayers of Norton (including my husband and I) fund YOUR kids' education. Funny how the mindset changes once one's kids are no longer in school. . . "

j&b wrote on Aug 27, 2007 7:06 PM:

" Connemara-Answer to your ? is The town hall people are responsible for the upkeep of town buildings. I have seen NO upkeep. Would you not do regular maintenance on your home? Their mind set is let it go to ruin and the voters will give us the OK for a new one. Just like some kids with a bike. Mom and Dad will get me a new one if I wreck this one. You keep voting yes. I bet you won't live in Norton for 5 more years. You'll be one of the "Vote and run". Our kids made 12 yrs through the Norton Schools and graduated from top notch colleges with flying colors and back then we voted "NO" and and Norton is still alive and well. Norton needs to get people elected to office that can balance a budget and watch the Town's spending. The Impact fee is a great idea. Unless you're a builder. "

Connemara wrote on Aug 27, 2007 6:21 PM:

" Norton seems to pride itself on being frugal - to the extent that half the buildings in town are falling apart. To all of these longtime residents who seem to pride themselves on attending every town meeting - why have all these buildings in Norton been allowed to fall into such disrepair? That certainly didn't happen overnight. It's a disgrace. Then the same people run around screaming, "no! no! no!" everytime the override issue comes up. I guess for some people it's more important to be frugal for the sake of being frugal than it is to have a community (and school system) that residents can be proud of. This town is becoming an embarrassment. VOTE YES ON SEPTEMBER 18TH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "

to get a clue wrote on Aug 27, 2007 5:13 PM:

" why does it take 6 officers to direct traffic on 123 when the pipes are being worked on? There are more cops than cones. "

tired of it wrote on Aug 27, 2007 1:46 PM:

" How about an Impact Fee for the builders of new homes in Norton? Duh! Many states and the communities in them do this to keep taxes down. What would be the planning board and the selectmen's excuse to topple that? You couldn't have builders of homes in Norton on any of these boards though. Isn't that a conflict of interest? "

get a clue wrote on Aug 27, 2007 1:19 PM:

" This is a typical response from another uninformed norton voter. "take from other departments" is no solution. As a police officer in this town I can tell you we have no money to give. We have not had a increase in our budget in over 6 years. Same number of cops on the street as we did 25 years ago. We are 12 officers under the national average for similiar size towns. Norton wants 1st class service but doesn't want to pay for it. The service will continue to get worse until $$ is found to help public safety meet nortons growing needs and population. Please be informed before you make comments you know nothing about. "

j&B wrote on Aug 27, 2007 12:33 PM:

" If you have voted and resided in Norton for 40 years or more. This is all "DEJA VU". The people that want the "TEMPORARY" (ha! ha! Believe that and I've got a bridge over a river in NY that I want to sell to you!) TAX, HAVEN'T BEEN ON THIS EARTH 40 YEARS! If they believe the word "temporary". They can be convinced to vote on anything. Norton voters beware. Take from other departments! I doubt it. More scare tactics. This is getting very old. It's time to give up the ghost on this "TEMPORARY" over ride. "


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
 or 






News | Sports | Classifieds | Archives | Subscribe | Guestbook | Home | About Us | Contact Us

© The Sun Chronicle, Attleboro-North Attleboro, MA.
All rights reserved.  |  Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.