34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Bitten teen no foe of dog park in Foxboro




FOXBORO - A 17-year-old high school senior from Plainville was the person bitten earlier this month at the Foxboro Dog Park, and is nearing the end of a series of rabies shots as an outpatient at Caritas Norwood Hospital.

But Edmund Jones Jr., a co-captain this past season on the Warriors football team at King Philip Regional High School, said he is not a foe of the controversial dog park.

"I do love going to the dog park, but I don't want to favor either side," Jones said Tuesday.

Jones said he was at the park with his girlfriend and her dog Feb. 10, and was bitten when he tried to break up a fight between it and another dog.

He expressed concern that a perception that a child was bitten might jeopardize the park's survival. Opposing sides in a battle over the survival of the dog park, which opened in 2006, might tug Jones' account of the biting incident into the fray.

Debbie Cunniff, a co-founder of the dog park, said she told Jones he might be subpoenaed to give information about the biting incident in a lawsuit brought to Land Court by 17 residents seeking to close the park, which is privately run on town land at Cocasset River Park off Mill Street.

Judge Keith Long last Thursday issued a preliminary injunction requiring all dogs to be leashed at the park, but agreed to the town's request to hear further evidence in a continued injunction hearing set for 11 a.m. Friday. The board of selectmen and the conservation commission are the defendants.

The conservation commission padlocked the entire Cocasset River Park until further notice last Saturday in the hope of heading off confrontations between abutters and park users.

In the meantime, Jones said he hopes the owners of the dog that bit him will come forward with proof the dog was vaccinated so he will not have to continue the series of about 15 rabies rabies shots over several weeks.

"Nobody's ever survived rabies before, so better safe than sorry," Jones said. "I don't want to sue them. I don't want to get into any of that. I want them to come forward and say their dog is up to date" on its rabies shots and possibly have a veterinarian confirm that the animal that bit him is healthy.

Cunniff said she called Jones and spoke with him last Friday night about the incident. Cunniff said she wrote down Jones's account of the incident and submitted it to Sam Perkins, the attorney defending the town in the lawsuit.

"We called Eddy out of concern for his well being," Cunniff said.

Jones, the son of Edmund and Anne Jones of 48 George St. in Plainville, said he and his girlfriend were at the dog park to let her 2-year-old, Siberian husky, Honor, get some off-leash exercise.

He said he is very fond of the black and white husky, which has "the most beautiful blue eyes," and that he tends to refer to the pooch as his own. Jones said a yellow/orange short-haired, medium-size dog was "playing nice" off-leash with other dogs roaming in the fenced park. He said the dog was with a man and woman in their early to mid-30s, and the woman told him her dog "doesn't like huskies."

"The dog started barking and growling at my dog," Jones said.

Jones, who stands 6-feet, 3-inches, weighs 275 pounds and played right tackle for KP, said he attempted to ward off the other dog by hitting its head, and was bitten on his left thumb.

When the woman asked if he was all right, Jones said, "Yes." He assumed the couple would stay so that he could get information about the dog, but the pair vanished, along their pet.

"Literally 15 to 20 seconds, and they were gone," Jones said.

On the advice of a doctor, Jones reported that night to Caritas Norwood Hospital for rabies shots, and received several. He said a doctor told him he would have to make four return visits for additional injections.

During the court hearing last week, attorney Edward Valanzola, representing the residents opposed to the park, told the judge that a high school student had been bitten.

The paper incorrectly reported that the biting victim was a child and that this Friday's hearing would start the trial. A trial date has yet to be set.

 


dogsrule wrote on Feb 21, 2008 7:26 AM:

" dear soxwin123. I believe this site is so important to us because the volunteers have put many hours and lots of money into it. It was designated because it was not being used and it was a mess. It already had most of of the fence needed and it also has the small pond (some like to call it a large lake) It has ample parking and when looking at the other areas there is nothing that compares. I can't even think of another area in Fox that is not already utilized and would not cost soo much more money to fix up. Debbie and Heather have been working on this park for years. I read it in the paper at least a year before it opened. I am not an abutter so I don't know what kind of notice they got but if you read your local paper, which we should all do, they would have had plenty of notice to complain then, before Deb and Heather and many other volunteers put soo much time and money into Cocasset Park. The park is finally being put to use after being disregarded for many many years. The trash that was there I remember it being from when I was a child..a long time ago. Why should we,after all our work, going through the proper channels etc. just sit back and say ok.. close it? "

kyraskye wrote on Feb 20, 2008 8:01 PM:

" Thank you for your support. As a user of the dog park, and a lover of dogs (I work with them all day and night) I enjoy using the park with all my dogs. I agree that name calling is unnecessary, and I am sad that it has happened. It was stated on another article (in the comments) that it seems like the residents- as a few persons complaining are not the actual home owners- are looking at the land being used by the dogs a an extension of their back yard. I believe that if the courts do decide to remove the 'dog' park of the park, that it will be a mixed blessing for the owners, I am sure that children make much more noise than dogs, and you can't regulate them the way you can with dogs.

All the persons that are aware of the issues surrounding the park are being cooperative, and following all the rules and regulations. There are people who are not aware of the situation, and those are the ones that are giving it all a bad name.

The only thing that we can do now is trust in the judicial system.

Thank you for your support.

"

mikek wrote on Feb 20, 2008 5:42 PM:

" I don't quite understand your concern. Although I do admit that the level of discourse on this issue has really sunk pretty low, the dog park users are passionate about their ability to let their dogs run off-leash in a controlled environment. The abutters are equally passionate about their desire to close the park. A vigorous debate is appropriate. Name calling is uncalled for and rediculous. However, pointing out facts is always a good thing. And the facts seem to clearly support the dog park advocates. If there is justice in this case, the judge will see things this way. In my humble opinion, this case comes down to a simple question. Is a town allowed to designate a portion of town land as a dog park as long as the location is zoned for such use? All this talk about an occasional dog bite, excessive barking etc are red herrings. All these things are to be reasonably expected at a dog park. If you don't want to chance a dog bite, don't go to the park! And the position that a dog park denies the use of that area for others is ludicrous. The dog park is located within acres and acres of non-dog park conservation land and state forest. Non-dog lovers clearly have other alternatives! No, this is clearly a case of a few selfish abutters who want things their way. Sad. "

soxwin123 wrote on Feb 20, 2008 11:32 AM:

" Can somebody tell me why this site is so important to the dog park proponents...is there not another site that would serve the purpose? The mishandling of this site and moreover, the misunderstanding of the nature of dogs is creating a bad name for responsible dog owners everywhere!!! "


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
 or 






News | Sports | Classifieds | Archives | Subscribe | Guestbook | Home | About Us | Contact Us

© The Sun Chronicle, Attleboro-North Attleboro, MA.
All rights reserved.  |  Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.