News
Y director: Near drowning 'traumatic'
Top Headlines But German added that it appears lifeguards and staff who were on duty performed as they should have, although the boy was pulled from the water by a 14-year-old swimmer, rather than a lifeguard. "All things considered, the staff acted appropriately," German said. "Can we learn from this situation? Absolutely." The young boy, a regular attendee at a Y-sponsored after-school program, was found at the bottom of 4 feet of water by a swimmer who bumped into the submerged child while swimming. The unconscious boy was carried to the edge of the pool by Jesse Mallon, a 14-year-old Attleboro High School student, and was lifted onto the pool deck by a lifeguard. The child was transported to Sturdy Memorial Hospital after being attended to by YMCA staff and paramedics and was later released, German said. The boy returned to the Y later in the day with his grandfather to retrieve his clothes. "The bottom line is that the child is all right," said German who added that the boy indicated he intends to return to the Y program. Attleboro police investigating the near-drowning found nothing to indicate anything other than an accident, Sgt. Arthur Brillon said. Some witnesses who commented about the incident on The Sun Chronicle Web site, thesunchronicle.com, complained that cardio pulmonary resuscitation was not started immediately and that there were delays in administering oxygen to the boy. German said he can understand witnesses' reactions to the rescue. "To see a young boy, an apparently lifeless body, removed from the pool, I don't know how many people wouldn't panic," he said. When the child was removed from the pool, German said, staff members found that he had a strong pulse and there was shallow breathing. Under the circumstances, CPR was not necessary, German said, although a staff member returned with a bag containing CPR gear and an oxygen bottle. The boy was given oxygen, German said. Staff members immediately gave instructions to place a 911 emergency call for medical assistance, German said. The boy was taken to Sturdy, and later to Hasbro Children's Hospital in Providence. The near-drowning occurred during a family swim period when up to two dozen swimmers were present, from young school children to adults. The boy, who has been attending the after-school program for some time, was known by staff members and judged to be safe inside the pool. German said he did not know whether the child was a proficient swimmer. German said it is estimated the child was under water less than 30 seconds. At the time of the incident, the pool - 5 feet at its deepest, and the shallower of two at the Y - was staffed by a lifeguard and a swimming instructor. However the swimming instructor was not tasked to perform lifeguard duties. Five lifeguards, including two at the deeper pool and another just coming on shift, were available at the time. Prior to the child being found underwater, the teenage lifeguard on duty had had to speak to some youths in the pool because of "boisterous" behavior, German said, and had calmed them down. Such behavior is not unusual, German said. In situations in pools where drownings have occurred, fellow swimmers are often the first to locate the stricken person German said. Roiling of the water by swimmers and visual obstructions formed by others in the pool put poolside observers at a disadvantage. But that doesn't mean the lifeguard was not being attentive, German said. "A half-second later, the guard might have been the first person to see him," he said. The YMCA has already reviewed the incident with staff members, who have agreed to meet with the other Y staff members to share their experiences. German said the guards who were on duty have been profoundly affected, but are handling the incident well. "I think in a situation like that, you go over it in your mind and ask yourself, 'What else could I have done?'" he said. German said the YMCA has already resolved to step up training for its lifeguards and water safety instructors, including more frequent drills where underwater silhouettes are used to simulate drowning victims. The Y also is re-emphasizing its "10-10" system used by guards to monitors pools. It calls for lifeguards to scan the surface of the area under their control for 10 seconds, followed by scanning the bottom for 10 seconds. The scans are alternated continuously during the entire time the pool is occupied. All guards used by the YMCA are certified by the American Red Cross or the Y, German said. During their shifts, guards sit in an elevated chair above poolside to provide a good vantage point. The YMCA's rule of thumb in the number of guards assigned to each shift is based on the number of patrons using the pool. The current ratio of lifeguards to swimmers is 1 to 24, German said. However, the Y is considering increasing the number of guards to allow closer safety monitoring. An independent safety expert has been hired to investigate Tuesday's event and will turn in a report, as well as recommendations, German said.
Post Your Comments slr1234 wrote on Apr 14, 2008 2:12 PM: " I go to the Y 4 nights a week for an aquatics class. The night before the accident at the pool there was a young lifeguard on duty, who sat and talked to a young man the whole time, and at one point, were both sharing a magazine. I realize she was watching an adult class, but an adult can just as easily drown. The night after the incident, there were two lifeguards on duty, and seemed attentive, for the first half hour we were in the pool, then proceeded to walk into the aquatics office, laughing and talking to another staff member. There was not a single lifeguard in the pool area. Even after the terrible accident, the lifeguards seemed relaxed and unconcerned. I think the lifeguards really need to be re-evaluated and re-trained. " lifesaving wrote on Apr 12, 2008 11:24 AM: " The lifeguard operations at this Y may be questionable. However, it appears the lifeguards and Y staff acted appropriately and professionally once the incident was recognized. (A) The child was not in cardiac arrest, therefore, CPR was not required. (B) 911 was called and patient care was provided while waiting for EMS response. And, (C) The lifeguards administered oxygen which is the appropriate protocol for a hypoxic patient.
The fact that the child survived this incident and was released from the hospital is indicative that he was submerged for a very, very short time. Should the lifeguard(s) have recognized this incident? Absolutely! Should there have been at least two lifeguards on duty? Yes. But, was there any negligence? Very doubtful. The YMCA staff and lifeguards should be congratulated for their quick and appropriate response. Gerald Dworkin Lifesaving Resources www.lifesaving.com " attleboroparent wrote on Apr 12, 2008 11:04 AM: " Ive read in the postings that there were five lifegaurds present, however they all were not monitoring the pool at the time of the incident.I speculate, it probably wasn't their job at the time.
I ran to them and alerted them , they could not hear the first life gaurd call for help. The lifeguards are kids themselves, adults really need to step in to help monitor and supervise them. All the children in the Y programs need constant supervision, they are children, they need a safe enviornment in this unpredictable world. " attleboroparent wrote on Apr 12, 2008 12:13 AM: " First I'd like to say Im so relieved to read that the 6 yr. old boy is ok. However it sounds like he could still use our prayers to ask that his health is fully restored and there will be no secondary complications.
Also God Bless Jesse for his heroic actions. Jesse your a great teen role model, THANK YOU. To the YMCA, you've been around for ever. there's nothing like a YMCA. The community needs the Y. The children need the Y. Mr. German make our YMCA safe, we are counting on changes. Why not put out an anomynous Y member survey asking about safety concerns regarding aquatics, after school programs, day care etc? Then post a follow up on how you plan to address those concerns. " attleboroparent wrote on Apr 11, 2008 5:15 PM: " There are three areas that needed to be addressed to prevent this from happening.
1 Communication from the after school program to the area the children are playing. Supervision for the younger children (or a buddy system). 2 Lifeguards need to pay attention to the water at all times (no socializing) 3 Train everyone frequently to limit panic, check victims, cpr if needed, stay with victims, and call for help " skeptic wrote on Apr 11, 2008 4:03 PM: " No I don't work for the Y. " skeptic wrote on Apr 11, 2008 4:03 PM: " To anonymous3, if you read my comment I was obviously being glib. There was an article yesterday about all the politicians filing pet bills.
I do believe there should be an impartial investigation. Everyone is too quick to assume the Y is at fault. (800 number lawyers depend on this attitude) " anonymous3 wrote on Apr 11, 2008 3:48 PM: " I feel the need to comment on some of the comments to this article...
mlprmp - I was there the day of the incident and I remember the lifeguards attending to the boy WAY before the aquatic director came out of the office. Also, there actually was one lifeguard watching the new pool. The other was teaching a private lesson in the shallow end. There was also another lifeguard watching the old pool for lap swim and another private lesson going on in there. Personally, I saw a lot of horseplay going on where the child went under which the lifeguard attempted to stop. I did not see the child go under but it could have been caused by the roughhousing of the older boys. I'd also like to note that the only problem in this rescue was that a patron noticed first, rather than the lifeguard. Some people commenting on these articles are making it seem like the lifeguards did nothing to assist the boy and did not do their jobs. skeptic- Why would legislation get involved? There is already an ongoing investigation and what could politicians do? Your comment was confusing... dbuttons1- Keep doing what your doing. I have also noticed that there are some really inattentive lifeguards and they should be reported to the aquatic director. Unless patrons report this behavior they will have no way of knowing that it is going on. " dbuttons1 wrote on Apr 11, 2008 1:22 PM: " Who is telling the truth here - the citizens that were at the pool that day and witnessed the event or the YMCA director? This article sounds like a cover up by the YMCA. Where were the YMCA employees that supervise the after school program children? Weren't they in the pool area while the children were swimming? Shouldn't they be there to provide another set of eyes? I have a family membership at the YMCA and I have to say right now I'm not very displeased. My children have taken swimming lessons at the Y, and while some of the lifeguards that teach are very good and attentive, others just want to flirt with each other. They end up wasting half of the 30 minute lesson just talking to each other, instead of teaching the children how to swim. I observed one life guard at a family swim session that was reading a paperback book. In hind sight, I should have confronted him but I didn't as I knew I was watching over my children. This is a wake up call for the aquatics department of the YMCA. They need to be retrained. Parents like me need to speak up when we see things that are not right. We are paying a fee for their services and one of the things we should not have to worry about, at all, is the safety of our children. " skeptic wrote on Apr 11, 2008 1:00 PM: " Traumatic for the staff? Gee, I wonder how it was for the near-victim, his family and the rescuer.
I just hope a thorough investigation is carried out by what ever body regulates public and private pool safety. A real investigation, not just a chance for politicians to hold hearings to get their names in the paper and be associated with the anti-drowning special interest groups... " mlprmp wrote on Apr 11, 2008 11:34 AM: " I'm writitng this comment in response to the YMCA articles. I was at the Y pool Tuesday, when the 6 yr old boy nearly drowned.
There was not 5 lifeguards on duty there was two. 1 was giving my child private lessons at the shallow end of the pool.The second life guard was at the other pool for lap swimming. In my opinion a second life guard should have been on duty for the open swim pool. There is no way that 1 life guard can provide a lesson and watch over a pool full of people. The teen boy that saved the child physically carried the boy out of the pool and placed him on the side and began yelling for help...NO ONE CAME TO HELP! I had to go into the office of the aquatic director to get help. when he came out, he too started yelling for help from the lifeguard. Not one adult new this child and where he was from. One little girl new his first name. Prior to this incident, myself, and others have complained about the inadequate supervision and incompetence of the aquatic staff. I, and a friend, who also had a child in swim was told, that for what they pay this is the best they can do. It is a shame that this has to happen before they were forced into taking action to provide adequate safety precaution. " or
|