34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Short circuit in North Attleboro




Dispute delays appointment
NORTH ATTLEBORO - A dispute between a member of the building department and North Attleboro Electric has sparked a decision by selectmen to postpone their annual appointment of the town's wiring inspector.

North Attleboro Electric and Wiring Inspector Paul LaFratta have recently traded letters regarding a dispute over electrical work done at a downtown business. Details of the dispute were not clear at Thursday's meeting, leading selectmen to postpone the appointment of the wiring inspector for two weeks.

The postponement means that the wiring inspector's post will be vacant for most of the first week of June because LaFratta's current appointment ends on May 31. Town Administrator Mark Fisher said Assistant Wiring Inspector Bruce Haselton can carry out the department's duties in the interim.

Electric commission Chairman Thomas Corrigan alluded to the issues between North Attleboro Electric and LaFratta when he appeared before selectmen complaining there is little communication between departments.

He also criticized selectmen Chairman John Rhyno for collecting letters at his business from residents or officials with concerns. "I cannot stop residents from dropping off letters at my garage," Rhyno said, adding that all of the letters are passed along to the board and the town administrator's office.

"You get so many letters, you should have your own zip code," Corrigan replied. "There has been a series and series and series of letters, and we're still getting zero communication."

Selectmen said they did not have enough information to discuss the matter and noted that LaFratta wasn't there to give his side of the story.

"The people involved are not here to respond to this stuff. I don't want to give anyone the impression that they will be talked about when they aren't here to defend themselves," Selectman Michael Thompson said.

Corrigan also alluded to an August incident when LaFratta was fined $3,000 by the state Ethics Commission for violating conflict of interest laws.

At that time, LaFratta admitted to the conflict when he approved permit applications filed by LaFratta Electric, a business he owns with his son, to do private electrical work on six occasions in 2005 and 2006.

LaFratta said he was only following the policy established by the prior building inspector requiring him to initial the paperwork.

"There's been a pattern. When are we going to have a (disciplinary) hearing for the electrical inspector?" Corrigan said.

Complicating matters further, selectmen have two candidates for the wiring inspector's job. LaFratta has reapplied and David French, a North Attleboro resident and self-employed electrician, has also applied.

French appeared before selectmen Thursday to say that most of his work is done in the Boston area. "If I am duly appointed, I will not perform anymore work in town," he said.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » No comments posted. « Hide Comments

mmarcia wrote on May 23, 2008 1:45 PM:

" Isn't it more like an auto mechanic inspecting his own car? It's rather double-dipping - he does the electrical work and gets paid by his customer, then he inspects it and gets paid for that by the Town - which is your and my money, thank you. "

skeptic wrote on May 23, 2008 11:48 AM:

" I believe brower5298's attempt to use reductio ad absurdum falls short. Spending money with a competitor is falsely anagulous to being able to make decisions that affect the competitors business and reputation, whether denigrating it or enhanding it. "

realist wrote on May 23, 2008 11:37 AM:

" to brower5298 - I did not question Mr. LaFratta's ethics or qualifications. If one has any sort of say over the work of one's competitors or business associates or one is ultimately responsible for the approval of one's own work that is a conflict of interest.
Voting for one's self only makes sense. If you were running for office you are doing so because you feel you are best qualified. You're other scenarios are as you described them "far fetched". Here's a more reasonable argument; should the owner of a local restaurant be the health inspector? "

mmarcia wrote on May 23, 2008 10:41 AM:

" "Corrigan also alluded to an August incident when LaFratta was fined $3,000 by the state Ethics Commission for violating conflict of interest laws."

Big surprise. This guy shouldn't be inspecting his own work or the work of his competition. I wonder what other electricians have to say about this?!? "

brower5298 wrote on May 23, 2008 10:16 AM:

" I think whoever the wiring inspector is, should be a qualified candidate and follow the Massachusetts Electrical Codes. Sometime last week there was a pull out in the Sun Chronicle naming LaFratta Electric one of the top three electricians in North Attleboro, I guess that says something. I feel that Mr. LaFratta is a well qualified, well educated, fair priced, people person. I think it would be beneficial to the town to have a local wiring inspector and not someone that works out of town and may not get to the inspections in a timely fashion. Does this mean that Paul Deschenes should step down as the Gas & Plumbing inspector since he has his own company in North Attleboro? How about a far fetched scenario, if I worked at Shaws would I not be able to shop at Stop & Shop? Or CVS, would I not be able to shop at Walgreens? Or at the Financial Office in Town Hall, would I not be able to complete taxes for someone that works there? Or if I was running for a selectman position, would I not be able to vote for myself? "

realist wrote on May 23, 2008 8:50 AM:

" Wouldn't this be a lot simpler if the town appointed a retired electrician or perhaps someone on disability who may not be able to do electrical work but could still inspect the work of others?
I don't know Mr. LaFratta but just being able to approve and inspect the work of competitors is a conflict of interest. It's along the same lines as the developers trying to get on the planning board or conservation. They may have the best intentions, but being able to comment and vote on the work of their competitors or potential business partners is a conflict. "


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
 or