34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Who's giving what?



Republican presidential candidate, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., left, and Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., reach out to shake hands during the Compassion Forum at the Saddleback Church, Saturday in Lake Forest, Calif. Host Rick Warren is seen at center.




Area residents chip in to back their favored candidates
Back when Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign was struggling and he was running out of money in the primaries, David Lupfer of Norfolk decided to help out the Arizona Republican.

He sent him a check for $250 and has followed that with a few more, giving a total of $700, according to campaign finance Web sites.

Lupfer said he decided to back McCain financially because he agreed with him on some issues, but also because he did not like the prospect of a Democrat like Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama getting elected.

He said he questions Clinton's character and believes Obama is too inexperienced for the White House.

Lipfer said he has given to Republicans candidates in the past, "but this is the first time I've gone this high," because he is so concerned about the outcome of the election.
"I do believe John McCain has the experience and the character that make him much more qualified," he said.

But, David Egilman, who runs a occupational health consulting firm in Attleboro, looks at McCain and sees someone who will continue the policies of President George W. Bush.

Egilman said he is so worried about the situation, he has donated $2,300 to Obama and may give more.

"I did it due to the past eight years we have gotten a war that is a mess and an economy that is a mess. McCain offers more of the same - if not worse. I don't think you could screw things up worse if you tried," he said.

Egilman and Lipfer are among scores of local voters who are willing to support their candidates at the ballot box and through the wallet.

They range from larger donors like New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, who donated $2,300 to McCain after contributing to former Gov. Mitt Romney in the primaries, to local voters who have given a few dollars.

Some of the larger McCain donors include John Walsh of Attleboro, $950; Helen Cleary of Norfolk, $800; and Joseph Jianos of Foxboro, $2,000.

Big Obama contributors include William Wieners of Attleboro, $2,900; Linda Sohn of Mansfield, $850; and Janice Panoff of North Attleboro, $625.

The figures came from Web sites that monitor campaign finances, such as the New York Times, but some of the numbers may not be up to date.

The reasons local residents give for contributing vary.
Andrew Latto of Foxboro said he considers his donation to Obama similar to giving money to charity. He said his aim is to make the country better.

Latto said he was first attracted to Obama four years ago when the Illinois Democrat made the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention in Boston.

"I said, 'Here's someone who is a smart guy, who expresses himself well, and who the whole country can get behind,' " he said of Obama.

Latto said when Obama started running for president, he found himself agreeing with the senator's views on the economy and the war in Iraq, so he decided to contribute.

Egilman said he helped Obama because he believes the candidate has a world view that helps him understand what other countries think of the United States, adding that he also admires that Obama became an community organizer in Chicago after graduating from Harvard Law School.

For others, the reasons are more basic.

Edgar Bristol of Foxboro said he contributed to McCain because "he's a solid person."

JIM HAND covers politics for The Sun Chronicle. He can be reached at 508-236-0399 or at jhand@thesunchronicle.com.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » No comments posted. « Hide Comments

Anna DeMarinis wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:04 PM:

" http://www.ilga.gov/senate/transcripts/strans92/ST040402.pdf

The transcript. Read it yourself. The Illinois legislation came up more than once. In 2001, Senator Obama was concerned about the legislation's impact on abortion, as celt notes. But when the bill came back in 2002, the issue about the law undermining abortion had been addressed.

In 2002, Obama was not concerned about Roe v. Wade. He was not concerned with undermining abortion laws in Illinois. No, what Senator Obama today claims were his concerns were not his concerns back in 2002. In 2002, Senator Obama stood on the floor of the Illinois State Senate to oppose the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. By this time, even the abortion rights organizations like Planned Parenthood had dropped their opposition. But Obama continued to oppose the law. "

Anna DeMarinis wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:58 PM:

" celt: Obama got the language he was asking for protecting Roe v Wade and he STILL voted against the bill. Obama's supporters are slinging the phony story. At least Obama's campaign admitted the truth. Listen to Obama's own words. "

celt wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:13 PM:

" For those who are interested in the truth, here it is. Opponents of Roe v. Wade know they cannot get that ruling overturned so they created a strategy whereby they would propose a lot of smaller bills that would nibble away at it. The bill under discussion is one of those. Obama wanted language in the bill that would assure that the bill had no effect on Roe v. Wade. Right wing nuts are twisting the issue to smear Obama. Again, Republicans cannot stand on their own miserable record so they are desperate to scare you out of voting for Obama. Dont fall for their lies and distortions. "

Anna DeMarinis wrote on Aug 21, 2008 6:40 PM:

" Well, jose, when Obama was a State Senator, he consistently refused to vote for laws requiring doctors to give medical treatment to babies who survived botched abortions. Those babies lived but were tossed in the trash to die and Obama thought that was just fine. He couldn't answer the question last Saturday "When does a baby get human rights?" because according to his own voting record, which is confirmed by his campaign and the transcripts from the time, babies who survive abortions don't have a right to life, even if they are viable. A vote for Obama is a vote for infanticide. Obama: any abortion for anybody (even an underage girl) at any time under any circumstances and if the baby survives, it's OK to kill it. That's one of his positions that is nothing short if heinous. "

realist wrote on Aug 21, 2008 3:21 PM:

" Obama is no different than any other Chigago democrat. He knows how to play the system and he knows how to play people.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121918996082755013.html?mod=mostpop "

jose21 wrote on Aug 21, 2008 1:45 PM:

" I love people that have an opinion and talk as if everyone that doesn't share this opinion is dumb and uneducated, or "emotionally unanchored, and civically challenged" "

jose21 wrote on Aug 21, 2008 1:24 PM:

" What exactly do you base all your opinions on? What policies or opinions of his do you dispute? "

kevin h. wrote on Aug 21, 2008 1:09 PM:

" 0bama parrots inspiring words from the past and acts like he is a true leader for the future. It's all fluff. This guy isn't worthy enough to tie the shoes of MLK or JFK (or many other initials I won't list.) He is a TV host and it's sad that todays society is so emotionally unanchored, and civically challenged that they could fall victim of this empty suit selling his snake oil. "

kevin h. wrote on Aug 21, 2008 1:04 PM:

" "Egilman said he is so worried about the situation, he has donated $2,300 to Obama and may give more."

If 0bama is elected we will ALL have to give more...in Taxes for every feel good program under the Sun. "


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
 or