Election Coverage
Frank: Palin family raised issue first
Top Headlines Rep. Barney Frank is among the first Democrats to publicly say that the pregnancy of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's unwed teenage daughter should be fair game for campaign discussion. "They're the ones that made an issue of her family," Frank, D-Mass., said Tuesday in a telephone interview with the Associated Press. Bristol Palin's pregnancy was announced by John McCain's campaign last weekend in an effort, they said, to put an end to rumors that Bristol, 17, is actually the mother of Sarah Palin's 4-month-old son, Trig, who was born with Down syndrome. The campaign said Bristol plans to marry the father of the child, which is due at the end of December. Republicans stressed Palin's conservative family values in announcing her selection as McCain's running mate on Friday. Frank says the recent disclosure about her daughter blunts conservative claims that liberalism harms family life. "Apparently she's a great favorite with the conservative social movement," Frank said. "They have said that it's liberalism and liberals who have undermined families - same-sex marriage has been a problem, they don't want gay people to adopt ... This helps undercut those arguments." ![]() This 2007 file photo shows Bristol Palin, daughter of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, as a member of the Juneau-Douglas High School junior varsity basketball team.
In the Attleboro area, however, local mothers were quick to rally behind Palin, saying she cannot be held responsible for all the decisions her family makes."No matter how good of a parent you are, your kids are going to make their own choices," said Carolyn Coletti, of Attleboro, who has grown children. Coletti, who is not supporting either presidential candidate, said she can see a double standard in the way people are reacting to pregnancy, saying the pregnant child of a male candidate might not elicit such strong criticism. "People feel that the mother has more control (over their children) and know more of what's going on than dads do," she said. Sue Young, an Attleboro mother of 7- and 9-year-old boys, said she doesn't think the controversy will affect Palin's ability to help the Republican ticket, unless voters feel she isn't paying enough attention to her family. "If she neglects her family, or more of these stories come out, she could have a bad rapport with people," said Young, a McCain supporter. "People may think, 'If you can't run your family, how can you run your government?'" Both women said the revelations will not affect their voting decision in November. "The vice president has become such a figurehead, anyway," Coletti said. "If it was the president, who has so much responsibility, it would be totally different." Democratic candidate Barack Obama's campaign has avoided making any comment on issues related to Palin's family, specifically anything focused on her daughter's out-of-wedlock pregnancy. "I think people's families are off limits and people's children are especially off limits," Obama said Monday. Obama's sentiments were echoed by Norton resident Roberta Kennedy. "I don't think it's anybody's business and I don't think it should be in the press." Questions about her daughter's pregnancy are likely to follow Palin, however, as she and McCain formally accept their party's nominations this week in St. Paul, Minn., and as the two continue to campaign for the country's top two offices. Associated Press wire reports contributed to this story. MATT KAKLEY can be reached at 508-236-0333 or at mkakley@thesunchronicle.com.
Post Your Comments ricknkim wrote on Sep 22, 2008 12:53 PM: " Vladimir - He "proposes" to lower taxes for the bottom 90% . . . that's all fine and good. However, with the ideas and programs he has, his "proposal" will soon show holes and taxes will rise to pay for them all. In reading your posts, I know you are far wiser than to actually believe the crap that comes from a politician's mouth as truth. " ricknkim wrote on Sep 22, 2008 12:49 PM: " "Saywhat" - why are you so mean-spirited and angry when someone has the audacity to have a view other than your's? I think your argument lacks anything of substance due to your inability at being objective - you are mixing your personal hatred of a president cloud your judgement in a rational debate. Mr. Bush is many things . . . a war criminal he is not. " saywhat wrote on Sep 5, 2008 8:46 PM: " The bottom line is Sarah Palin will try to shove her far-wacko-right-wing ideals on all of us and seeing McCain probably will last only the four years, that is what we have to look forward for for the next 12 years. Anna, it's clear you have a hate for muslims and, apparently, want us all to confirm to some Bible-beating know-nothing from Alaska. Here it is in short: Bush lied, people died and McCain and this woman you righties have annointed the next mother theresa brings nothing to the table but 12 more years of Bush and Cheney. I'm sorry, but I think we've had enough of war criminals and violators of our constitution. Don't You? " vladimir1 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 2:09 PM: " That's interesting ricnkim: Obama plans to lower taxes on 90% of middle incomes. He also plans to end federal subsidies to the oil corporations, a plan the republicans have characterized as raising taxes. " ricknkim wrote on Sep 3, 2008 5:03 PM: " I hear ya Jose21, I think this is a total non-issue and completely irrelevant as to how effective a VP she would be. I haven't yet decided on who I'm voting for - I am affraid Obama is an African American Jimmy Carter and I'll see my taxes skyrocket and with McCain I'm affraid it will be more of the same insider Washington crap. Would love a viable 3rd party to finally emerge . . . . " jose21 wrote on Sep 3, 2008 4:52 PM: " Rick, I agree. I was bringing it up because I know it's something Palin has been pushing to be taught in the school, along with evolution. And to be honest, I'd be amused to hear some of the crazy opinions of the topic on the site. I'm voting for Obama, but I don't really care about this girl one way or another, and I don't care if Palin was pregnant when she got married, I don't think any of these issues really matter. I don't need to read about this 17 year old girls story to know Palin is pro-life, I just need to know what party she belongs to and that will answer the question. " ricknkim wrote on Sep 3, 2008 4:16 PM: " Let's leave Creationism to the pators on the pulpits and to people's homes Jose21. Not sure why the abortion issue is on this blog - the young lady along with her parents and boyfriend have made the decision to let nature takes it's course and not interfere. Let's all be thankful that her family appears to be supportive of her in a difficult/demanding situation for a young lady. Why oh why is this a devisive issue? The pro-choice camp is mad that they didn't abort or show her how to use birth control products? Get over it - do what you may with your own children and respect the Palin's personal choice. " jose21 wrote on Sep 3, 2008 3:59 PM: " This is great reading. Can you guys move onto creationism next? " SoxFan wrote on Sep 3, 2008 2:55 PM: " A question for dogpark: I admit I am ignorant so if you could help me out I would appreciate it. You blame the Governor for her daughter's pregnancy (failure to teach how to have pre-marital sex without protection) and apparently for not killing the baby. Both of these positions limit Bristol's potential for free will and ability to make choices so my question is this:If all the faults of the child are the responsibility of the parent and the parent should make all the decisions, are your parents writing your posts for you or just proof-reading them? Imagine that the Governor had a child 8 mos after getting married. She would have been much better off murdering the kid and not being in a relationship that will never last because they were 2 kids in love. oops, sorry, it did last. Maybe the governor's parents made the right choices for her " kevin h. wrote on Sep 3, 2008 2:30 PM: " Anti-choice??? dogparkpatron is spun up (out of their mind) and can't believe that others would not do as they would. Palin, AND her daughter have made their personal CHOICE... to have a baby. You know, the kind of choice that keeps the human race going. " ricknkim wrote on Sep 3, 2008 1:58 PM: " dogparkpatron - So what if her parents taught her only about abstinence? What is wrong with that? That is their personal choice - who are you to judge otherwise? Is it that they are pro-life that makes you uncomfortable? I know my mom is the one who talked to us first about abstinence and later about birth control when we raised the question. Was my dad a bad father because he was uncomfortable talking about such things and just sat there squeeming in his chair as my mom spoke? As for being only married for 8-months before welcoming their bundle of joy, why does that threaten you? Why is that put into neagtive terms by you? Is being married and then pregnant a requisite for obtaining your approval as a good parent? Why are you, the media and the Democrat Machine trying to tear them down in such a spiteful way? It is an ugly game you all play with the Republican's and it is far from flattering. " wfk21 wrote on Sep 3, 2008 1:47 PM: " dogparkpatron: You used an interesting choice of words and showed your true colors when you wrote: "...Palin, being anti-choice..." Anti-choice...hmmmm. Is this the new term being bantered about by the "Pro Abortion" err, ummm I mean "Pro-choice" advocates? Don't call her pro-life, let's call Palin "Anti-choice". SPIN SPIN SPIN it until it works for ya! " dogparkpatron wrote on Sep 3, 2008 1:20 PM: " ricknkim, Your story has an element that is totally denied to Palin's daughter; you said your parents taught you about abstinence AND BIRTH CONTROL. Palin, being anti-choice, doesn't believe in birth control, JUST abstinence. Big Difference. Birth control might have prevented this, had it or the knowledge of it been available for her daughter. Oh, and by the way, Palin and her husband had their first child only 8 months after their (shotgun) wedding. I think it runs in their world... " realist wrote on Sep 3, 2008 11:37 AM: " to ricknkim - I think you've said it all. At 17 it could have been anyone of us. To sole -- congratulations on your ability to look into others' souls. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shadow " ricknkim wrote on Sep 3, 2008 10:12 AM: " I think it is ridiculous that people are making this such a big issue. Sorry folks, this could be any of our children and it is far from an indication as to being a good or bad parent. Everyone who is throwing daggers should clean-up their own backyard and reflect on their own misdeeds before casting judgement. So typical for today's lazy & judgmental society, do as I say not as I do. I think everyone's own memory is too short . . . I could have easily fathered a child at 17/18 in HS even though my parents taught me about abstinence and birth control. I was lucky I didn't and that was it, pure luck. Like I said, everyone here and across the nation should take a look at themselves before putting forth any demeaning judgement of the parents or the young girl. It is unfortunate that teens get pregnant as they are certainly not prepared and it is costly for all of us in terms of financial support and beyond. However, are we supposed to treat them as outcasts and make the situation worse for the child? No - it happens and the family should do just as the Palin's are, rally around their child and provide love and support. " sole wrote on Sep 3, 2008 9:43 AM: " This is NOT Sara Palin's situation. This is Bristols. So saying Sara Palin is living up to her beliefs is not the issue here. She is for Abstinence only eduction and partially repsonsible for her daughters pregnancy. Look at the real issue here. And you KNOW those kids are bing forced to marry. If you don't think so your so blind. " realist wrote on Sep 3, 2008 8:56 AM: " I think Gov Palin is proving that she lives up to the Christian values she says she holds. She has shown that, in spite of a mistake, she still loves her daughter and she is proving that she holds no malice toward the father of her future grandchild. (I'm sure there was some shouting and tears - who's perfect?) So dogpark patron, unless you feel you truly qualified to cast that first stone back off. " SoxFan wrote on Sep 3, 2008 8:51 AM: " Dogpark: I stand corrected. In an attempt to demonstrate how an irrelevant aspect of a public figure's life should not have an impact on our decision as to who to vote for, I used a poor analogy. It is too bad that there is not someone in Barney's life that does not make political decisions for him that did anything that might bismirch his political accomplishments. It is too bad, for the sake of fostering discussion, that there is not anyone in Barney's life that ran an illegal brothel out of Mr. Frank's Washington area residence. The point was not the sexuality it was that even the most despised public figure has aspects of their life that, as long as it does not impinge upon the person's ability to perform the job for which they were elected, should not be an issue for the voters. " skeptic wrote on Sep 3, 2008 8:45 AM: " to dogparkpatron - Why is it when a Democrat's kid does something (Al Gore's son) it's ignored by the press because it's not the candidate. Yet when it's a Republican - no problem, attack away. Remember how excited the press was to find out that VP Cheney's daughter is a lesbian and then having a child out of wedlock. How disappointed they were when Mr. Cheney proved to be a loving and excepting father. Ad for Barney, Mr. Frank is an embarassment. He is given a free pass by the press. If he were heterosexual he would have been out of office and in prison. He hired a male prostitute and then let him run the business out of his home. What's more embarrassing is the voters who keep electing them and the Dems use him as their attack dog. " Hojo20 wrote on Sep 3, 2008 8:42 AM: " For Barney Frank to comment on this is disgraceful. He is the last person that should comment on someone else's morality. " dogparkpatron wrote on Sep 3, 2008 7:42 AM: " Excuse me, but Bristol's mother put her in the spotlight. Not only that, but her mother, Sarah, is bringing in the boy who got her pregnant and parading him onstage tonight! You can't have it both ways, keeping them off the table as far as discussions go, and then parade them in front of the country on national TV. And besides that, what in the world does Barney Frank's sexual preference have to do with the GOP putting their failed 'abstinence only' education(?) on the national stage? " Forward Observer wrote on Sep 3, 2008 7:32 AM: " Barney Frank.... Now there's a man with great knowledge of family values and raising children. His former "partner" ran a house of prostitution out of their own living quarters. " SoxFan wrote on Sep 3, 2008 6:59 AM: " Barney is an embarassing dolt. If anyone tried to make his sexuality a campaign issue he would have the ACLU out in force. Mr. Frank: how about the possibility that Gov. Palin's daughter has different political values than her mother? Or worse yet, that she is pregnant as the result of "youthful indescretion" that so many of your co-workers cite as a reason not to delve further into their backgrounds. The Dems favorite president in recent history has illicit affairs in the White House while letting Al Queda get stronger by the minute and all of you turned your backs. At least allow the same courtsey for a 17 year old girl who is not running for office. I, like many Republicans, wish that the young Palin was not in this situation but it does not mean that her mother cannot do her job! " or
|