Area GOP impressed by their candidate
BY JIM HAND AND MATT KAKLEY SUN CHRONICLE STAFF
Friday, September 5, 2008 1:30 AM EDT
Republican presidential candidate John McCain acknowledges the crowd as he goes on stage Thursday night. (Associated Press)
In accepting his party's presidential nomination Thursday night, Sen. John McCain said he's prepared to get the country "back on the road to prosperity and peace" in a speech local Republicans in attendance said proved he is the best chance the country has for meaningful change.
Polls show that nearly two thirds of voters believe the country is headed in the wrong direction, leaving both Democrats and Republicans scrambling to convince the public they are the true agents of change.
State Rep. Betty Poirier, R-North Attleboro, a delegate at the Republican National Convention, said McCain's speech did just that.
"He's always been the one calling for improvement and making changes," she said. "He's going to demand that things be done for the American people."
State Rep. Jay Barrows, R-Mansfield, who also served as a convention delegate, said Thursday's speech helped to show the differences between McCain and his Democratic opponent, Sen. Barack Obama.
"This wasn't show business, this was real business," Barrows said, referencing Obama's acceptance speech last week, which took place in front of an estimated 84,000 Democrats.
"This was smaller. It felt as though he was talking right to us," he said.
McCain's speech concluded the Republican National Convention where he was portrayed as "the original maverick" who is courageous enough to take on special interests in Washington. His running mate, Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska, was labeled an outsider and reformer.
Convention delegate Danielle Fish of Mansfield, a member of the Republican State Committee, said McCain and Palin presented a "team approach" that will "challenge the status quo in Washington."
She said they are willing to put partisanship aside and put "country first" in addressing problems, although many Republicans do not believe "we are completely on the wrong track."
Democrats counter that Obama is the one who can change the country with his economic policies to boost jobs, health care and education.
They question how Republicans can change Washington when they are the ones who controlled the White House for the past eight years.
"I agree with Republicans that we need change, but if you vote for John McCain you are voting for a continuation of the last eight years," said U.S. Rep. James McGovern, D-Worcester.
Peter Brock, a Democratic activist from Foxboro, said he did not see the bipartisanship that Republicans said they were offering. Speakers at the Republican convention, especially Palin, seem more interested in bashing Obama than offering solutions, he said.
Barrows disagreed with Brock's assessment, saying the Republicans did not bash their opponents. Poirier added that McCain clearly presented his proposals to delagates.
"He laid out his plans, exactly what he's going to do on all facets of the economy," she said. "He did a great job."
One thing both Democrats and Republicans agreed on was that Palin sparked the Republican convention and gave a boost to McCain's chances.
"It was a great speech and it breathed some life into that ticket," McGovern said.
"It was just what our party needed," Fish said.
With the general election about two months away, Barrows said he is optimistic that the Republican Party will be victorious.
"We've got some work to do," he said. "But, hopefully, we're going to be successful going forward."
View Comments » No comments posted.
« Hide Comments
ps911fan wrote on Sep 10, 2008 7:43 AM:
ricknkim wrote on Sep 8, 2008 12:24 PM:
ricknkim wrote on Sep 8, 2008 12:15 PM:
I think it is difficult to really tie Obama to any controversial economy/oil/etc. votes for 2 reasons: all votes he did cast for his 2+ years in the senate were with the 2008 presidential race in mind; he rarely votes . . . he's missed 46% of the Senate votes. Of course that is not nerly as bad as McCain missing 64% of votes! "
GOPSue wrote on Sep 7, 2008 6:50 PM:
realist wrote on Sep 6, 2008 10:24 PM:
chiman1111 wrote on Sep 6, 2008 5:42 PM:
vladimir1 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:50 PM:
The bill, sumitted by Obama on January 4, 2007, is S. 115 and it reads,
"To suspend royalty relief, to repeal certain provisions of the Energy Policy of 2005 and to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal certain tax incentives for the oil and gas industry."
Subsidies.
He did this in an effort to force the oil and gas industries to invest in alternative, renewable and cleaner alternative energy sources.
And Palin/McCain continue to line their pockets with oil money. "
realist wrote on Sep 5, 2008 5:01 PM:
ricknkim wrote on Sep 5, 2008 2:30 PM:
As for Vladimir's post that Obama voted against the bill with oil subsidies, please check the record, he voted in the affirmative on a bill that DID provide subsidies to big oil.
McCain is supposedly against lobbyists and insiders in Washington but has a long history of be cozy with them over the past 25 years. Obama has all this international experience and part of important legislation . . . he's been there 2 years folks and been running for president more than half the time so that's complete bull. "
Anna DeMarinis wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:56 PM:
Realist wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:52 PM:
To chiman1111 - do you have a game where you keep count of the responses to your moronic posts? The only group you haven't insulted are ethnic minorities.
BTW -I could find nothing that says Obama writes his own speeches. "
Anna DeMarinis wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:42 PM:
vladimir1 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:40 PM:
Then there is the base - That poor couple who had to go to work because they lost their real estate INVESTmENTS. Aw, that sucks. I guess they want a free market and a guarrantee. Then there is taxes. Obama wants to cut federal subsidies to oil corporations - McCain and Co call this "raising taxes." But, on a high note, Ole Walnuts didn't collapse before the end of his speech. By the way, how another republican administration keep the country safe if they can't even keep protesters out of "energy" arena? "
Anna DeMarinis wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:36 PM:
Anna DeMarinis wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:31 PM:
Anna DeMarinis wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:29 PM:
chiman1111 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:17 PM:
socal1 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 11:23 AM:
skeptic wrote on Sep 5, 2008 11:16 AM:
ricknkim wrote on Sep 5, 2008 11:12 AM:
realist wrote on Sep 5, 2008 11:12 AM:
As for chiman1111 - For the record, McCain isn't retired. As for not getting his first choice for VP no one in either party would have taken an independent as a running mate. While it would make a feel good subplot for the West Wing or some other lefty show an independent, by definition, has very little political base. An independent cannot count on support from either party. Every issue would be a struggle. In the event of the president's death or resignation an independent would be the worst kind of lame duck.
Personally, I like Lieberman. He's smart and stands up for his beliefs. Unlike members of his former party who campaign and govern byweekly poll results. "
ricknkim wrote on Sep 5, 2008 11:09 AM:
As for speeches - they all use teleprompters to deliver prepared speeches fed to them by professionals writers. They may have input, but they are delivering someone elses material. So we should judge them on their delivery of someone elses lines? Sounds like what we do when we go to the movies . . . oh yeah, one in the same! "
jose21 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 11:02 AM:
saywhat wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:58 AM:
skeptic wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:54 AM:
As for second choice VPs, JFK took LBJ as his VP because the party demanded it not because idealogical considerations. "
chiman1111 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:49 AM:
jose21 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:18 AM:
jose21 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:08 AM:
celt wrote on Sep 5, 2008 9:51 AM:
Anna DeMarinis wrote on Sep 5, 2008 9:47 AM:
realist wrote on Sep 5, 2008 9:27 AM:
Is this called balanced reporting or making sure that Obama and McGovern are mentioned in the paper everyday. I guess Barney Frank wasn't home? "
Hojo20 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 8:27 AM: