34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Snacks fail out of Attleboro schools




ATTLEBORO - Elimination of students' snacks at three city middle schools is drawing fire from some parents who say growing children need fuel to learn.

The principals of the Brennan, Wamsutta and Coelho Middle Schools sent home letters to parents earlier this month outlining a number of changes that have been made to make policies more consistent among the three buildings. However, a decision to do away with snacks has drawn criticism from parents, who say hunger may affect their child's learning.

"My son's starving by 9 or 9:30," said Brenda Furtado, whose has a fifth-grader attending Wamsutta.

Furtado said her son is allowed to continue having his snack because of a medical problem. However, she is concerned about other children, and says she and other parents are considering raising the issue with the superintendent or school committee.

Wamsutta Principal Karol Coffin said all three schools sent home a letter covering several changes, including the snack policy, music and art classes and the discontinuance of overnight field trips. Coffin said a middle school administrative team made up of the three schools principals and assistants have been working to make policies and practices more uniform. Principals of all three schools are scheduled to be present at tonight's school committee meeting to discuss the changes, said Superintendent Pia Durkin.

According to the letter, snack times during class are taking up too much instruction time, and a decision was made to eliminate them. However, the schools made adjustments by moving up lunch times so that the first lunch begins around 10:50 a.m.

Students with medical needs are being accommodated on a case-by-case basis.

Students are still allowed to bring water bottles that can be used between classes.

Some parents raised the issue at a PTO meeting last week at Wamsutta, Furtado said, and Coffin acknowledged that some parents were upset.

Coffin said snacks can take as long as 20 minutes, and having as much time available as possible for lessons is a high priority.

The principal said she understands that snacks have been ingrained as part of school culture for many years, but that the change in policy may become more palatable as time goes on.

"We need to give this some time," she said.

School committee Chairwoman Roberta Wuilleumier said she can see the parents' and students' side.

"I need a granola bar at 10," Wuilleumier said. The letter sent home by the principals also said the schools will no longer offer a popular overnight field trip to Washington, D.C., and will consider educational day trips instead.

Coffin said the cost of the trips has risen to $500 per student, participation is down and that last year only two of the schools participated.

The three schools also have aligned their course offerings so that art is offered in fifth, sixth and seventh grades in all buildings.

RICK FOSTER can be reached at 508-236-0360 or at rfoster@thesunchronicle.com.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » No comments posted. « Hide Comments

offended wrote on Oct 17, 2008 1:15 PM:

" Mmarcia is calling our kids miscreants and wants us to support her business?? No one asked you to donate snacks. The comment about business owners donating was an idea someone had about fundraising for school trips. I can feed my own kids thank you. And so can everyone else that is concerned with snack in schools. Truthfully, on this subject I have no strong opinion.my kids follow the rules, whatever they may be. I applaud the superintendent and Ms.Coffin at Wamsutta for attempting discipline, consistency and fairness. A bigger problem than snack in schools is bullying. There are children getting abused and emotionally and physically hurt in our Middle Schools. My concern is there. BTW, my husband is also a business owner in Attleboro and the last thing he is worried about is scooters on the sidewalk for Petes sake. "

sunfan wrote on Oct 15, 2008 1:38 PM:

" First, try feeding the kids a NUTRICIOUS breakfast (not chocolate chip pancakes, for God's sake!) If your kids are "starving" by 9:00 or 9:30, it's because you either didn't feed them enough, or fed them junk. Most parents nowadays eat junk food 24/7, so it's no surprise they don't have a clue what to feed kids. Adults claiming "I need this or that snack myself" is so immature. You may want it, but you don't need it. It's the same immature attitude that got you head over heels into debt because you don't know the difference between need and want. "

sandyv wrote on Sep 29, 2008 7:49 AM:

" Snacks are vital to students as well as adults. If they do not feel snacks are important why does Dr. Durkin provide a snack to her staff on professional development days? If adults can not survive without them why should kids have too?
Teachers can have snack time after they have taught the lesson and the kids are doing the independent part of the work. The teacher is not talking the entire time.During that quiet time is perfect to sielntly eat. The children in elementary schools do this just fine. High school should also have snack. "

mmarcia wrote on Sep 24, 2008 11:37 AM:

" To sassi_87 and jenica25: As a business owner, I'd have to say NO to my donating snacks to the schools!!!!! These are the miscreants who clutter up our downtown sidewalks with bikes, scooters, skateboards, etc and don't spend any money.

Why is it they're "our" kids when it comes time to give them something but they're YOIUR kids when tax time rolls around? "

adesvergnes wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:11 PM:

" And to reply to the comment by John Jones about the bathroom: They DID also tell the kids that they can only use the bathroom the last 10 minutes of class. They must "hold it" if nature calls before then! "

jenica25 wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:07 PM:

" Yes ask the business owners. As someone who has a business let me tell you...now is not the time to ask the local businesses to cough up more money. With rising fuel costs, taxes, and mandatory insurances most find it hard just to pay our bills. Maybe the parents can save some money and send their kids to D.C. like mine did. "

adesvergnes wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:02 PM:

" The students should absolutely be allowed to have a HEALTHY snack and a drink to boost their energy! My daughter comes home and says how jealous she is of her teacher.."gulping down soda and eating crackers". If the teachers can have snacks and drinks the kids should too. That's just cruel to allow the teachers to eat in front of them, when they are forbidden to snack. Remember.........we are humans, not robots........we seem to forget that in this crazy world that we live in. "

sassi_87 wrote on Sep 22, 2008 5:03 PM:

" I'm a 21-year-old senior at Rhode Island College, and I attended Wamsutta Middle School from 1997 - 2001. Snack time never took too much of the day, and it makes no sense at all that it should be cut from students' days! I've worked full-time over the last two summers, in medical billing, from 8am --> 5pm every weekday, and, since I had breakfast at 7am, I snacked around 12:30 PM, then had a late lunch (1:30 - 2:30).

I recall going to Washington D. C. at the end of 8th grade, for an entire weekend, but it was fully funded by fundraising. I sold candy to my volleyball team, neighbors, and family. While in D. C., I had an awesome time. If the schools cannot afford it, try additional fundraising or see if any prominent businesspeople could donate.

Looking at an earlier post that mentions open-heeled shoes are now forbidden in middle schools, I am thankful that I attended Wamsutta when I did, instead of now! Do kids have no freedom anymore? Now they cannot snack, go on school-sponsored educational trips, or dress themselves... how depressing. "

john jones wrote on Sep 22, 2008 4:30 PM:

" "Who thinks up this kind of stupidity! I assume that sooner or later they'll say we have to use the restroom before school and can only go at 11:30a.m. to. I say we vote out the perks the main office gets, like a/c, coffee, and snacks as well. I believe if this is their decision, then they follow as well. This is almost as dumb as the no open back shoes. Someone needs to wake these people up from their dreams." "

skeptic wrote on Sep 22, 2008 3:10 PM:

" Human bodies are not engines. The food you have eaten this morning is not all directly converted to energy. Your body can store food. You don't have to eat a set number of calories per hour to match your output. If you eat three balanced meals then your body will store energy it does not need and call upon the stores when it is needed. If you eat all low-fat food then you will not have anything to store. There are times a Slim Jim or piece of cheese would be a better snack than an apple. "

getreal wrote on Sep 22, 2008 3:08 PM:

" Harry- Johnny may not catch up easily with your cumulative "week" out of school, but he'll never catch up if he starves to death first! "

Harry Hindsight wrote on Sep 22, 2008 2:17 PM:

" Kids need food to run. Let's do some simple math. 10 mins each day x 180 days of school (if I have it right)= 1800 mins per school year for snacks. 1800min / yr x 60 min/1 hr = 30 hours of class time to eat. If the student is to be in school 6 hours a day, that makes for 5 days from the school year just to eat. It may not sound like alot of time out, but take a week out of school and see how long it takes Johnny to catch up. "

ADS wrote on Sep 22, 2008 12:39 PM:

" Harry - recess was cut too.
And I'm sure if it was proposed that additional time was added to the day, the teachers union would be up in arms over the extended work day. "

Harry Hindsight wrote on Sep 22, 2008 12:23 PM:

" These are grade school kids right? They still have recess? If so, let them eat then. Case solved. Or lets extend the school day the extra 10-20 minuetes that these snacks are taking from instructional time. The kids get to eat to stay attentive and they do not loose lesson time so they are getting their full day of education! "

kids need fuel to run wrote on Sep 22, 2008 11:18 AM:

" If we do not feed our bodies we run out of fuel. How can children concentrate on their school work when their stomaches are growling? As parents we all feel that school is very important but I don't think 10 min. out of each day for a snack is going to change the results of the almighty MCAS.As for more art in school that's nice but how about Computer class? In a global world I think Computer class rather than more art would prepare our 7th and 8th grade students for the future. What happened to Multimedia for 7th and 8th graders? As for the overnight trips shouldn't a parent be the one deciding if they want to spend $500.00 to send their child to Washington D.C.? Don't fundraisers help with this? "

realist wrote on Sep 22, 2008 11:11 AM:

" To HoJo20 -- nutritionally you may have a point about snacking in class. However from a teaching standpoint it's very distracting. When teaching night school classed I try to be lenient when students want a little something since many have not eaten since lunch time. However, when you look out on your class of 10 to 20 students and they're chewing away and rattling wrappers etc - it's tough for others to concentrate and this is college level. I can imagine it at elementary level. "

pma186 wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:39 AM:

" I had a bowl of Cherrios (Honey Nut)and a cup of coffee at 7:30AM this morning and was looking for a snack by 10:00AM. My ten year old son had 2 pancakes (choc. chip) and a glass of milk at 6:45AM (out the door for Brennan Middle School at 7:15AM). I can only imagine how he is feeling right about now. No, wait. He told me the other day, he is "starving" by mid-morning. And you expect the children to focus on their schoolwork when they feel this way? You cannot possibly convince me (and the other concerned parents) that this decision (to remove "working" snack from the middle schools here in Attleboro) is endorsed by the Teachers. If one attempted to apply such a rule amongst teachers themselves the Union wouldn't allow it. The standards specific to availability of food (for students,teachers, and personnel) should be consistently applied. "

ADS wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:16 AM:

" I think there should be snacks in middle school. These are kids for goodness sake.

Every job I ever worked entitled me to a 15 minute break for every 4 hours worked, and access to water/ a drink/ the bathroom whenever I needed it. Why should my 5th grader be any different? If they shaved 2 minutes off each class, they'd have 10+minutes for snack.

Look at any 'healthy diet plan' and it will instruct you to eat breakfast, a mid morning snack, lunch, a mid day snack, dinner and a small snack before bed.

My 5th grader is up at 6:15am, to catch the bus at 6:50ish. Even an 11am lunch is 4 1/2 hours or more since his breakfast. Not to mention, if he's buying lunch, the 20 minutes he gets to eat is really eaten up by waiting in line to get his lunch. More than once my kids have come home and told me they barely had time to finish their lunches when they were buying. I pack lunches now often to be sure they have enough time to actually eat!

The article also doesn't mention the reduction of recess either. "

skeptic wrote on Sep 22, 2008 9:29 AM:

" momof_4 -- You just described my morning. Breakfast at 0600 and lunch at 1300. Maybe water or coffee in between.

In our grazing culture where Moms open snacks in the supermarkets for their children to keep them quiet and people feel the need to constantly suck on a bottle of water, what's wrong with going a few hours without food? "

momof_4 wrote on Sep 22, 2008 8:54 AM:

" When you finish your breakfast prior to 7 a.m. and go off to work make sure you are ready to not have a snack, coffee or anything other than water until 10:30 when you will be given 20 minutes from start to finish to complete your lunch time. (hope your not buying) Then you will not be allowed to eat or drink anything other than water until after 2:30. Please tell me that you are then able to learn at the level these children are being asked to learn. If snacks are so bad, why does the school PROVIDE them during MCAS. This test is so important that we will allow them to have snacks then! Furthermore, the snack rule can be adjusted to allow for goldfish or granola bars that will not disrupt the class. Please remember we are talking about 5th graders who are 9 or 10 years old and should be in elementary school still receiving recess as well as growing 6,7, & 8th graders. As for the away trips that the school took away, as a parent who has attended more than once I must say, you do not know what your children are missing. "

dayrider wrote on Sep 22, 2008 8:42 AM:

" Whatever happened to having a good breakfast that would last you until lunchtime? If kids had a decent breakfast they wouldn't need snacks. How times have changed and for the worse. You go to school to learn, not waste time on eating and goofing off. Let's get back to the basics of school. You can fill yourself with snacks when you get home. The soda companies sucked us in by offering big money to let us poison our children with soda pop. Let's get all junk food and junk soda out of our schools so they can have healthy bodies to learn with, and be a credit to society instead of a debit. These far away overnight trips, are they really necessary? Take a family vacation to D.C. on school vacation time. That would be a lot more fun going with your family. We are now in a recession, does anyone know what that means. It means money is not as plentiful as it was and we can't do all that we have been very lucky to do in the past. Your going to tell me a student can eat their snack and concentrate on a lesson at the same time, come on now you've got to be kidding. School is for learning, not to see how much food you can eat in one day. Go to school with a good breakfast. "

Hojo20 wrote on Sep 22, 2008 8:41 AM:

" Why can't students snack during class at any time? I mean I snack all day at work and I am still productive I can't imagine how much learning is done when my kids' stomachs are grumbling. Another case of the schools not knowing how to deal with children. "

realist wrote on Sep 22, 2008 8:34 AM:

" watcher2 -- Why is it that whenever there is an issue involving food the food police have to step in demanding the snacks be nutritious and healthy and the room has to be scanned for potential allergens? I suppose all snacks will have to be approved in advance? Make sure there are no trans-fats, high fructose corn syrup, artificial colors or flavors. Here kid, have a handful of oats. "

getreal wrote on Sep 22, 2008 7:42 AM:

" Poor MCAS performance tied to too many granola bars......only in Attleboro. Maybe school performance could be improved if we eliminated coffee breaks for administrators. They're obviously getting way too much caffeine causing them to stay awake at night thinking of idiotic ideas like "snack elimination" "

watcher2 wrote on Sep 22, 2008 7:40 AM:

" depends on WHAT the snack is! A piece of fruit, cheese and crackers and an awareness of allergies in the room could make for a beneficial snack. Cookies, candies, soda, high sugar or high fat substances should definitely NOT be allowed! Should take NO time from the lesson, with a HEALTHY balanced breakfast and lunch going three hours without food should not be a hardship...infants are usually only fed every four hours or so! "

concerned about kids wrote on Sep 22, 2008 5:50 AM:

" Many teachers and parents have expressed concerns about the elimination of snacks in middle school. The pushing up of lunch to 10:45 for the fifth grade has only changed the need for a morning snack to the need for an afternoon snack. Those students could use a snack at around 1:00 when they start to drag. Snack in most classrooms has always been a working snack which means munching and continuing the lesson. The duration is usually no more than 10 minutes. No time from learning. In fact, learning is enhanced. "


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
 or