News
Area may lose $18M from Question 1
Top Headlines That estimate comes from the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, a non-partisan organization funded by business, which is fighting the referendum to eliminate the state's income tax by 2010. The income tax accounts for 40 percent of the state's revenue. However, the organization says, the state spends a large portion of its $28 billion budget on non-discretionary items. These include such costly expenses as federal requirements for Medicaid and constitutionally-mandated education aid to local schools. As a result, the organization estimates that all other budgets would have to be reduced by 71.1 percent by 2010, when the phase-in of the income tax elimination would be complete. The organization then estimated what a 71.1 percent loss in state aid would mean to each of the state's 351 cities and towns. In the Attleboro area, the total loss in revenue would be $18.9 million annually, according to the organization. Leading the way would be Attleboro, where an almost $5.5 million cut in state aid would represent a more than 5 percent loss in revenue for the city. "Those kinds of cuts could not be absorbed by the city of Attleboro without devastating effects to services that we provide to the citizens of Attleboro," said Barry LaCasse, the city's director of budget in administration. The foundation report said no Chapter 70 aid to local schools would be cut because of the state's constitutional requirement. However, LaCasse said schools still would be affected if Question 1 passes. "There are other expenses that the city pays for that are not covered under the Chapter 70: transportation, facility maintenance, capital improvements to the schools," he said. Mayor Kevin Dumas and all area legislators, as well as all candidates for state legislative seats in the area, are opposed to Question 1. MIKE KIRBY can be reached at 508-236-0344 or at mkirby@thesunchronicle.com.
View Comments » No comments posted.
« Hide Comments
|
publius wrote on Oct 13, 2008 5:38 PM:
The safest job in state government is being a rep or senator. Look at them now. They are getting ready to give unprecidented, and I might ad, unconstitutional budget cutting power.
They are completely abdicating their responsibilities as the people who set the budget by preparing to give a hatchet to the Governor to do what they don't have to courage to do. The same Governor who will be out of here come January if Obama wins.
If you have the temrity to vote yes on 1, you should also vote against whomever your rep and senator are, if they are opposed at all.
Go ahead, vote yes. The live with it. "
Spamalot01 wrote on Oct 13, 2008 5:28 PM:
Roger Williams wrote on Oct 13, 2008 5:11 PM:
hope2008 wrote on Oct 13, 2008 3:38 PM:
As far as the argument that union employees can do the right thing because they cant get fired for political reasons - it is also true that we taxpayers have to continue to pay the salaries of horrible employees that would be fired in the public sector. Unions once held their members to a much higher standard - not anymore. Speaking for myself - I cant afford your benefits or pensions. I lost my 401 recently. Any union members want to help me? Lastly, please do not infer that unions are not political. Because they have become so political, they have hurt their image. my opinion.
I am voting yes on question 1. "
HARRY HINDSIGHT wrote on Oct 13, 2008 2:08 PM:
As for teachers, sure they have to take so many hours or credits per year, but there is no performance measure. Some may have lost the drive or abiltiy to teach, but what is the way to tell if a teacher can still teach? "
realist wrote on Oct 13, 2008 1:42 PM:
The problem with state unions is they protect the undeserving and punish those who excel in their fields. "
publius wrote on Oct 13, 2008 1:39 PM:
As far as question 1, I think we would be better served by redirecting 1/2 the income tax directly to the cities they come from. Right now local aid is a Robin Hood like ponsi scheme (take it in as income tax and redistribute it to the rest of the state). This redistribution is based on political clout, not need or where it comes from. If your rep or senator is on the outs, you don't get as much.
Attleboro has 82 cops. They go all out during their shifts. Many weekends they make up to 30 arrests (read the Attleboro District Court docket on a Monday morning). "
realist wrote on Oct 13, 2008 1:06 PM:
We'd save a fortune getting rid of unions. "
dandydon wrote on Oct 13, 2008 12:05 PM:
kevin h. wrote on Oct 13, 2008 10:37 AM:
It's time to get everybody out of the wagon and see who really isn't fit to pull their weight. "
realist wrote on Oct 13, 2008 10:20 AM:
Hand wringing and moaning do not count as plans. "
mamachia wrote on Oct 13, 2008 8:41 AM: