34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

For local voters, little to sway votes




McCain, Obama show testy sides
The presidential candidates wrapped up their third and final debate Wednesday night, but local voters said the event did little to sway them.

"I think it was a standoff," said Attleboro resident Marc Liberatore, who is the head basketball coach at Norton High School.

But Liberatore, who also teaches history and economics at the school, said the debate did show a side of John McCain that he hadn't seen in a while.

"He was much more aggressive, feisty," Liberatore said. "He showed more of the fighter-type than we had seen in the first two debates."

Delia Russell, a public health researcher from Attleboro, said she also noticed the aggressive side of McCain, but doesn't think it was enough to overtake Barack Obama, who is leading in many polls. "I don't think he was strong enough," she said. "I don't think there was enough details, enough examples."

Russell said she didn't think Wednesday's debate would hurt Obama, who she said looks to hold onto his edge in the polls.

"He was calm, determined and gave concise answers," she said. "I don't think he lost anything."

Both Liberatore and Russell said they thought the discussion about negative campaigning in the early part of the debate wasn't what Americans wanted to hear.

"They want to hear how (the candidates) are going to solve the problems," Liberatore said.

Richard Kieltyka, a financial planner who lives in North Attleboro, said the debate focused too much on old issues.

"I think we continue to hear the same differences of opinion and the same arguments we heard the last two debates," Kieltyka said. "Some of the key differences are how they propose to fix the system from a healthcare standpoint and providing a college education.

"There wasn't as much discussion as I would have liked to see on the fact we need to rein in spending, but that was touched upon," Kieltyka said. "I think that is absolute key in light of the economic situation today and the huge amounts of money being spent to get this economy on track."

Kieltyka said he hasn't made up his mind yet who he will vote for.

"I think from my standpoint, and the American voters," there remains the question of whether McCain is "truly a maverick or a Washington insider where we can look for more of the same." Kieltyka said he also thinks the public is still concerned about Obama's lack of experience.

MATT KAKLEY can be reached at 508-236-0333 or at mkakley@thesunchronicle.com. STEPHEN PETERSON can be reached at 508-236-0377 or at speterson@thesunchronicle.com.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » No comments posted. « Hide Comments

celt wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:34 AM:

" Ms. DeMarinis, I certainly prefer a surplus to a deficit which is what the Republicans have given us. You are being deliberately obtuse when discussing deficits. You are against them (and who isn't) but you are for the people who created the largest deficit in history. You are not making sense. "

Anna DeMarinis wrote on Oct 16, 2008 8:23 PM:

" celt: that Clinton surplus was my money and yours. I could have spent it on more important things. I prefer no government surpluses because that means they took my money and didn't do anything with it. As far as deficits, government should do what we all do when we have less money; spend less. Cut back. I don't have an open-ended credit card so I don't do deficit spending. Do you? I only spend what I earn. You go ahead and vote for Obama, but you will have to accept the rewards or the consequences. I will vote for McCain and hope that real voters will be able to overwhelm the phony voters the liberals have manufactured. Voter fraud willo destroy our freedoms and liberals ought to be ashamed that they have to resort to such tactics to win, but in the arena of ideas, liberal (socialist) ideas always lose. Just look at North Korea, the Soviet Union, Venezuela (going down the tubes). Is this what you want America to look like? Apparently, as an Obama vote will do just that. "

celt wrote on Oct 16, 2008 6:53 PM:

" Ms. DeMarinis, your words might mean something except for the state of the country after 8 years of Republican rule. So Clinton raised taxes. He also left a record surplus. Bush is leaving a huge debt which has to be paid someday with what? Taxes! Debt is nothing more than taxes that have to be paid later. It's like the Republicans said, "We won't take anything extra out of your paycheck, but let us have your credit card."

I know you think Bush is one of the great presidents that McCain is a real maverick, and that Palin is positively brilliant, but my eyes and ears tell me otherwise. And I know you have your excuses for Bush, but he will be held responsible.

I'm voting for Obama. "

Anna DeMarinis wrote on Oct 16, 2008 5:44 PM:

" Obama is definitely the dangerous candidate owing to his inexperience in executive work and his socialism in policy matters. He will approve trillions in new spending and pay for it out of the hide of our military, which he will eviscerate, and the wallets of middle class Americans. Clinton promised a middle class tax cut and what did he do when he got in? The largest middle class tax icrease in history. Obama lies. As for the polls, take them with a grain of salt. Many polls over-represent liberals and so they are naturally skewed in that direction. There are a couple good polls out there (e.g., Gallup) and as far as I know, they still show it a tight race, within the margin of error. Lots of people will decide right befor they mark the ballot or pull the lever, except of course, all those phony voters that Obama's pet group ACORN has created. Up to 200,000 phony voter registrations in OH. No wonder ACORN is working hard in the battleground states. If they can't cheat, liberals can't win. Vote for Question 1 and send the tax-and-spend liberals in Boston the finger. "

kevin h. wrote on Oct 16, 2008 3:43 PM:

" Fact: Terrorist favor Obama.


Obama on Zionism and Hamas
12 May 2008 11:58 am

The Hamas leader Ahmed Yousef did Barack Obama no favor recently when he said: We like Mr. Obama and we hope that he will win the election. John McCain jumped on this statement, calling it a legitimate point of discussion, and tied it to Obamas putative softness on Iran, whose ever-charming president last week called Israel a stinking corpse and predicted its annihilation. "

jose21 wrote on Oct 16, 2008 3:38 PM:

" commonsense - last time I checked we were not given a choice, we voted to decide who the candidates would be. Seems like every election people say the same thing, "why do we have to choose between these two guys". Maybe people shouldn't wait until late September when to actually show an interest in the election. Unfortunately for anyone that isn't voting for Obama, you waited to long, because the election is over. Just to be clear, commonsense, I don't know you and I'm not saying you fall into this category, but far too many people do. "

commonsense wrote on Oct 16, 2008 1:04 PM:

" mmarcia, thanks for catching the humor. All kidding aside,let's get serious. Let's agree that we all have been given a poor chose for president. I am no diffent than any of you ,I could be your next door neighbor or your favorite relative, the truth being I am a well educated, tax paying middle class parent of a soldier who is about to go to the Middle East to fight for our freedom and I am scared. I am scared for the country I love. I can't help feel we have serious trouble coming our way. The terror that was felt on 911 was only the beginning if we don't make sound choices in our leadership.We need dominance in economic affairs, we need experience in foreign policy. The choices aren't great, but I would rather deal with the devil I know then the devil I don't. Don't forget,the greatest thing about being able to post here is freedom of speech and I don't to ever lose that! God Bless America. "

mmarcia wrote on Oct 16, 2008 12:24 PM:

" Gee, folks, I saw commonsense's posting earlier and thought he/she was being funny. I'm still laughing!

Those of us who pay real attention know that ronbok is right - Congress (made up of democrats) has indeed screwed it all up. But until real Americans vote for people who can really make a difference we'll always get what we've always got. "

AttleBorrow wrote on Oct 16, 2008 12:21 PM:

" ronbok is right!

Why should we blame an administration for sending less-than-accurate information ( some might call it manipulating )to a congress and push them to go to war in Iraq that has cost our country BILLIONS under the guise of "If you don't do this, you are for the terrorists." There were some heros who stood up against this, but they were labeled traitors... shameful.

If you think McCain can balance the budget in 4 years, please vote for him. While you're at it, go purchase a lottery ticket, because you have just as much of a chance of winning.

Lastly, you're right. There are some socialist things going on in our country - USPS, Police, Firemen, etc. Maybe we should privatize all these things like we did with fighting forces in Iraq - Black Water comes to mind.

So please, don't elect "That One," because he's being realistic. "

sole wrote on Oct 16, 2008 12:20 PM:

" All I can say is that I'm never surprised of that amount of ignorance that people harbor.
Whats funny is the surprise you'll get if McCain gets in and you'll all still be crying. "

ronbok wrote on Oct 16, 2008 12:06 PM:

" Blaming the "Bush Administration" is like blaming your Mother for your birth. It's CONGRESS that's screwed this country and has the power to make law. Until America wakes up from the dream that the "President" aka Executive Branch is to blame for our troubles - we'll keep having them. "

ronbok wrote on Oct 16, 2008 12:03 PM:

" The choices couldn't be more clear. You're either a "Socialist" or somewhat middle ground "Conservative". Obama's Socialist agenda will kill this county and turn it into Europe - the wonderful role model they are. McCain won't do much better and they both lie out their teeth. McCain is however the lesser of two evils. "

mia wrote on Oct 16, 2008 11:29 AM:

" I agree. The first two postings are very disheartening, especially as they seem to be coming out of false ignorance, not true facts. "

AttleBorrow wrote on Oct 16, 2008 11:08 AM:

" Brilliant replies to this article ( rolling my eyes, like McCain! ).

My friends, you're postings are without merit. "

kevin h. wrote on Oct 16, 2008 10:27 AM:

" Terrorists favor Obama. "

commonsense wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:46 AM:

" Again Obama charmed his way into our hearts,but people are smarter than that.Word is spreading;we are in for a rude awakening if this man is elected.I can't help fear this unknown;he is the most dangerous political figure America will ever experience.He will be the 911 of political leaders.He is the Trojan Horse that will bring this country down.He has no patriotism, he has strong ties with radicals who hate our country;he will crumble under powerful leaders of other countries who seek to destroy us, our economy will crumble and America's chosen religion will become Muslim-oh I'd be afraid. "


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
 or