News
EMT critical of abortion clinic
Top Headlines Stephen Marcotte, an emergency medical technician with the Attleboro Fire Department, was quoted in the National Catholic Register that he was deeply affected by an abortion-related emergency call to Four Women Health Services in Attleboro. Marcotte is a spokesman for the Attleboro 40 Days For Life campaign, which includes prayer and fasting, as well as a peaceful vigil outside the women's clinic. "I asked the patient's name, like I do on all medical runs, but nobody knew," Marcotte was quoted as saying. "Here, they had just aborted this 19-year-old girl's baby, and I saw them scrambling to find out who she was. "To them, she was a procedure, a paycheck. That really bothered me." The report was posted on the magazine's Web site, www.ncregister.com. Marcotte declined a request for an interview with The Sun Chronicle, except to say that his opinions are his own and are not intended to represent the Attleboro Fire Department or fellow employees. A spokeswoman for Four Women's on Emory Street had no comment Thursday. The 40 Days For Life campaign began in September and is scheduled to end Nov. 2, two days before the presidential election. More than 170 communities in the United States and Canada reportedly are participating in the campaign. Many churches in the Attleboro area, including LaSalette Shrine, St. Joseph's Church, Holy Ghost Church, Our Lady of Mount Carmel in Seekonk and the Diocese of Fall River support the campaign. "As people here in Attleboro join with others from across the country to pray and fast and take courageous action for 40 days to end the tragic violence of abortion, we look forward to seeing what kind of transformation God will bring about in our city and throughout America," Marcotte told a Sun Chronicle reporter earlier this fall. As part of their efforts at the vigils, campaign supporters try to speak to women and provide information on alternative pregnancy centers, such as A Women's Concern, which has eight offices throughout New England. "We're not just asking women to choose life; we're offering them support throughout their pregnancy," Marcotte said. The article quoting Marcotte did not detail when the incident happened or give a name or identifying characteristics of the woman who was involved. Attleboro Fire Chief Ron Churchill said he is aware of Marcotte's activism and that political advocacy by a public employee is acceptable as long it does not mix with work. "He hasn't crossed that line," Churchill said.
View Comments » No comments posted.
« Hide Comments
|
ricknkim wrote on Nov 11, 2008 9:27 AM:
lindsay929 wrote on Nov 10, 2008 2:21 PM:
I don't like to give the impression of defending an abortion clinic. The problem is when an authority (such as a city employee) makes comments like this, as respected members of the community, their comments are considered expert. My criticism is directed towards someone I agree with in principle making a bad argument. It makes me furious because it weakens the position of those who could actually make a difference. "
ricknkim wrote on Nov 10, 2008 1:13 PM:
He spoke of what he saw/experienced - as he saw it. Could have been an ugly reality, could have been an unfortunate misconception on his part. Having a personal understanding of the ineguities from one nurse or facility to another, I could totally believe his story. But I'd also give the benefit of doubt to the facility knowing how easily misconceptions can be made. Unfortunately I have not heard or read the other side of the incident. "
lindsay929 wrote on Nov 10, 2008 12:37 PM:
I never said he referred to her by name in the publication. As a matter of fact, Im pretty sure the woman didnt call 911, the clinic did - and the EMT calls the clinic out for considering the patient a paycheck.
My point is it sets a dangerous precedent. The EMT employs faulty logic equating the clinics interest in caring for a patient to their ability to immediately identify her. These situations happen all the time, unfortunately. Example: a late night call to a nursing home where the staff is unable to identify the patient, giving the time honored Im covering, not my patient excuse. It happens, and to indict the facility based on this sort of interaction is careless.
I also never suggested that one should outlaw protest a la China. I commend this EMT for his defense of his principles and I commend you for yours. My point really has nothing to do with abortion, my concern is a city employees decision to publicize an on duty incident for the purpose of his off duty endeavors. The fact is, if he really felt that they were not providing due diligence, he should have gone to the state board of medicine and not a catholic newspaper. "
ricknkim wrote on Nov 10, 2008 9:31 AM:
As far as referring to the patient in a national publication, no name or any other identifying information was put out in that pub so "being called out" is completely innacurate on your part. The story was used in general terms so as to convey some concern that the EMT had. Not to identify someone.
As for the graphic signs, I agree in that they are distasteful - but so is abortion when used as a form of birth control in my opinion. But those pictures are reality, no? It is great to live in a country where I can have my own opinions and the right to picket/demonstrate. If you feel so strongly, either form a counter protest or simply ignore the demonstrators. I'd suggest never hint at outlawing one's right to demonstrate, that is a dangerous idea and you can see the ugly side of it if you care to visit China sometime . . . of course, just my opinion. "
lindsay929 wrote on Nov 9, 2008 8:28 PM:
Indicting this clinic as "only after a paycheck" because they can't immediately identify the patient to one of the EMTs? Get over yourself. As any health care provider that really works in medicine can tell you, patients are referred to by diagnosis or status merely because of privacy issues - not because no one cares! He must be new or something. A patient who really needs a medic doesn't need a name - they need immediate assistance. Name not required! He'd need her weight for drug calculation before he'd need her name! But, whatever reinforces your bias.
The fact of the matter is, if they didn't care like the EMT says, he wouldn't have been there in the first place.
Honestly, if I worked in that clinic and saw him and his friends protesting me every day, calling me a killer and so forth for doing my job, maybe I wouldn't have made his job easier either.
Moral of the story here is if you participate in something that others may consider offending their faith, you should stop and think before you call 911 - the EMTs might call you out in a nationwide religious publication. Classy. "
ricknkim wrote on Nov 7, 2008 12:16 PM:
bunny wrote on Nov 7, 2008 11:38 AM:
ricknkim wrote on Nov 7, 2008 9:15 AM:
You don't have to agree with them - I certainly think they could achieve more results with other tactics but they have a right to demonstrate so you should respect that. Otherwise, take a field trip to Russia, China, North Korea, etc. and appreciate your freedoms.
Last I checked, that neighborhood had bigger issues than pro-life demonstrators. "
outfall1945 wrote on Nov 7, 2008 6:39 AM:
ricknkim wrote on Oct 29, 2008 1:51 PM:
Horrible example and shallow thought process on your part. "
RLincoln wrote on Oct 29, 2008 12:26 PM:
I wonder how many pro-lifers here are also agains the death penalty? It always amazes me that people are so hypocritical as to be "pro-life", anti-abortion, yet would willingly take away another life. Either you respect all life or none. We are not empowered to choose. "
AttleGal wrote on Oct 29, 2008 10:50 AM:
ricknkim wrote on Oct 29, 2008 9:11 AM:
quaff787 wrote on Oct 29, 2008 6:23 AM:
ricknkim wrote on Oct 28, 2008 3:23 PM:
quaff787 wrote on Oct 28, 2008 2:59 PM:
Even worse is that some prolifers accept abortion if the female is raped. So is the baby from a rape less of a human than a baby from consensual sex? "
ricknkim wrote on Oct 28, 2008 1:58 PM:
Not a lecture - just an accurate account of what that "bunch of cells" represents.
http://www.pregnancy.org/pregnancy/fetaldevelopment1.php#week8 "
AttleGal wrote on Oct 28, 2008 12:54 PM:
An 8-week old bunch of cells has the POTENTIAL to be a living, breathing baby. it cannot live on its own. If I ever have another 8-week miscarriage, I'll find you and let YOU raise it. "
ricknkim wrote on Oct 28, 2008 10:36 AM:
However, I DON'T agree with talking down to people who have chosen abortion. There is a civil way to offering alternatives and educating on the topic. In your face tactics and shouting matches are not productive. "
saywhat wrote on Oct 27, 2008 8:03 PM:
Paul Couturier wrote on Oct 27, 2008 7:38 PM:
Thr PRO-ABORTIONISTS here are so VICIOUS and BLIND that they REFUSE to acknowledge the SCIENTIFIC and MEDICAL EVIDENCE that what a pregnant woman is carrying in her uterus is a LIVING, BREATHING, HUMAN BEING!
The UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE is there; THEY just have to ACCEPT IT!
You agree????????????????????? "
Paul Couturier wrote on Oct 27, 2008 7:35 PM:
I guess you didn't have an ultrasound first before you DENIED your HUMAN BABY its right to choose whether it wanted to live or die :( "
ricknkim wrote on Oct 27, 2008 9:51 AM:
I am personally against abortion and hate to see it used as a form of birth control, however, I also ultimately see it as a woman's personal choice (with the partner's input)even if in my mind, they are committing a form of legal murder once that child is a viable human organism.
I am always open to other's views and comments on my position - just not an out of control rant that is disrespectful. "
Upset wrote on Oct 27, 2008 7:49 AM:
And no, at the time I made my decision it was a mass of cells. I have friends who have had abortions and I supported them all the way, went with them, stayed with them afterwards- and had compassion for what they were going through. I do not condemn a person for being pro-life, it's a choice that living in the U.S. we are allowed to make. And again- if I become pregnant, and choose to abort, it is my choice.
Many factors go into a choice of whether to abort or put up for adoption or to keep an unwanted pregnancy.
The mental ramifications are enormous- and can you honestly say there are not enough unwanted pregnancys and children already in the system, up for adoption here in the US or around the world already?
My choices are my choices, yours are yours- don't force yours on anyone else- thats a violation of their rights, and privacy. when your child comes home and says that they are pregnant, or have knocked some girl up- are you prepared to raise that unborn child until your child is 18? That is what is going to happen- your money your time your life.
Think before you lash out at others- their circumstances could be totally different from yours. "
Paul Couturier wrote on Oct 26, 2008 5:40 PM:
Ever consider giving your baby up for adoption???????????????????????
Just some thoughts. "
candor wrote on Oct 26, 2008 12:00 PM:
Upset wrote on Oct 26, 2008 12:30 AM:
I was pregnant at 16 and my son was born when I was 17. I dropped out of high school when I found out I was pregnant- I adamantly refused an abortion, and finally decided to give him up for adoption.
Today, even 11 years later, I made the decision that if I get pregnant I WILL NOT go through that again. I will abort. I can not believe anyone who has not gone through the heart break or agony of having to leave the hospital with out the child you just gave birth to- you are connected to for the last 9+ months.
Anyone who takes away a womens right to choose is sick. I hated myself for putting myself through that situation, or that my boy could hate me in another 8 years from now.
Had I known then what I know now- I would have aborted, and avoided the pain I went through.
Sham on all of you! You go through being a teen, or adult and getting pregnant accidentally- and yes I was on BC and used other protection- and go through those months, and then hurt so bad a pin dropping breaks you in 2. Then you can have the right to speak out. "
Paul Couturier wrote on Oct 25, 2008 9:27 PM:
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
What are YOU talking about????????????????????????????
Are you imagining things??????? "
civil rights wrote on Oct 25, 2008 2:55 PM:
AttleGal wrote on Oct 25, 2008 2:24 PM:
Have you ever been pregnant? I doubt it, so you have nothing on which to base your rantings. "
Mary H. wrote on Oct 25, 2008 1:24 PM:
Paul Couturier wrote on Oct 25, 2008 1:11 PM:
I just tell like it is. I'm Me, and no one else!!
DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT???? "
socal1 wrote on Oct 25, 2008 10:40 AM:
Anna DeMarinis wrote on Oct 24, 2008 11:49 PM:
socal1 wrote on Oct 24, 2008 10:02 PM:
Ivan wrote on Oct 24, 2008 9:04 PM:
There seems to be so much festering pain out there over abortion that just the mention of it sends people into defensive mode.
If you go to the original article quoted here, you'll see that the firefighter was not using his position as a civil servant to promote his own agenda. In the course of responding to a medical emergency at an abortion clinic, his heart was touched. The original article talks about other firefighters leading similar prayer vigils, but as private citizens, on their own time.
It makes the point that it's a natural fit for someone who's used to putting his life on the line for strangers to do something like this. Thank you, Mr. Marcotte, and all the people involved in this national prayer campaign.
By the way, I think the reporter did a great job of presenting the story in an unbiased way - something you don't see a whole lot of in journalism these days.
Thank you, too, Mr. Foster. "
Anna DeMarinis wrote on Oct 24, 2008 8:23 PM:
socal: The illegal alien should pay for her own abortion and then go back to her home country. In fact, she should have her abortion there. I don't want the taxpayers paying for her abortion (which is more likely to be the case than the illegal paying for it herself). I oppose anchor babies. "
jimr28 wrote on Oct 24, 2008 7:44 PM:
I personally don't agree with him using his position as a member of local public safety to promote his own personal agenda, but I do agree with his first amendment rights to voice his opinion. "
socal1 wrote on Oct 24, 2008 6:06 PM:
Paul Couturier wrote on Oct 24, 2008 4:54 PM:
Paul Couturier wrote on Oct 24, 2008 4:52 PM:
I suppose you are one of those close-minded liberals who believes the stupid fairy tale that what a pregnant woman is carryinbg in her uterus isn't a baby, are you?????? "
mmarcia wrote on Oct 24, 2008 4:13 PM:
hockeytown wrote on Oct 24, 2008 3:53 PM:
It takes two people to concieve..but the choice is only the womens? Both man and woman consented to having sex and now one or the other doesnt want the baby. The woman says I want to keep the baby and the man says he doesnt..dont matter what he wants he has to pay for that child no matter what..thats okay?? I think he should pay he took part in the making of the baby.. now the man wants the baby but the woman doesnt.. but he has no say in it??.. and what about what he has to live with?..knowing that the woman took a life he helped create away from him... Just doesnt seem right that its all the womans choice when it takes two ..either way she decides and the mans rights are ignored..but he pays either way as well..money and or mental health wise just like the woman..just food for thought.. "
Southern View wrote on Oct 24, 2008 3:21 PM:
When you place no value on innocent life, what else matters? Why have respect for parents? Why care about drug abuse? Why care about healthcare? Why care about freedom? When you can "legally" kill an innocent life, what else matters? And for doctor's who take the oath, "first, do no harm", how do you live with that oath and your conscience? If you are a Christian, do you take communion? And yet you can condone killing a baby? "
socal1 wrote on Oct 24, 2008 3:03 PM:
Patricia S. wrote on Oct 24, 2008 2:18 PM:
Anna DeMarinis wrote on Oct 24, 2008 1:01 PM:
That "cellular tissue," which I call a baby, is often "expelled" at 8 weeks or later. I don't have the exact statistics at hand, but I believe most abortions are performed around 8 - 12 weeks. Rarely does a woman even know she is pregnant before 5 or 6 weeks and it takes a few weeks to schedule the abortion. So in most cases, it is a fetus that is aborted, because at 8 weeks, the embryo becomes a fetus.
By the way, Barack Obama voted against giving medical treatment to viable babies who were born as a result of a botched abortion. Nothing the pro-abortion people can say (and they will tell you all sorts of falsehoods to justify his votes) alters that fact. Obama voted against giving life-saving medical treatment to live babies who survive an abortion, preferring instead to have them pitched into the medical waste bin to die of starvation and dehydration. Despicable. Even Barbara Boxer and Nancy Pelosi were on the right side of that decision. "
eileenmarie wrote on Oct 24, 2008 12:52 PM:
Civil Rights wrote on Oct 24, 2008 12:42 PM:
pkiefner wrote on Oct 24, 2008 12:18 PM:
RLincoln wrote on Oct 24, 2008 12:10 PM:
Mary H. wrote on Oct 24, 2008 11:39 AM:
Here the guy's there on his own time, trying to help strangers with this prayer vigil, and readers can snipe about confidenciality laws, the man's ability to raise kids, etc. - any red herring - but fail to focus on the reality of what goes on in the clinic!
First of all, don't forget that this patient in the article needed medical help during a "safe, legal" abortion. Secondly, as an EMT, he just asked her first name to relate to her and calm her down, not to plaster it on the pages of the local paper months or years later, I'm sure.
Something has happened to the soul of our nation. How many critics of this firefighter would be more than happy to have him risk his own life in a burning building to save their pet?
I applaud the courage of pro-lifers who put themselves out of their comfort zone to help the least among us. Unless our right to life is secure, none of our rights are.
-Mary H. "
life wrote on Oct 24, 2008 11:34 AM:
ricknkim wrote on Oct 24, 2008 11:07 AM:
"I asked the patient's name, like I do on all medical runs, but nobody knew," Marcotte was quoted as saying. "
capecodanne wrote on Oct 24, 2008 10:59 AM:
robbiej wrote on Oct 24, 2008 10:40 AM:
I wouldn't, and I bet the 19 yr old wouldn't either. "
mmarcia wrote on Oct 24, 2008 10:22 AM:
rach520 wrote on Oct 24, 2008 9:56 AM:
Auk wrote on Oct 24, 2008 9:40 AM:
ricknkim wrote on Oct 24, 2008 9:31 AM:
Both the pro-life "extremists" and pro-abortion "extremists" behave horribly. Grow-up and RESPECT someone's right to have a differing opinion. "
mattryan5150 wrote on Oct 24, 2008 9:26 AM:
mattryan5150 wrote on Oct 24, 2008 9:24 AM:
tahraann wrote on Oct 24, 2008 9:16 AM:
socal1 wrote on Oct 24, 2008 9:04 AM:
sole wrote on Oct 24, 2008 8:50 AM:
robbiej wrote on Oct 24, 2008 8:39 AM:
Paul Couturier wrote on Oct 24, 2008 7:59 AM:
I'm REALLY pro-choice, except that I want the BABY to have the choice to decide it it wants to live or die a horrible, tortureous death at the end of an Electrolux vaccum cleaner! And last time I checked
And to Rick Foster, THANK YOU for exposing this SATANIC operation at this "clinic" where one out of every 2 people who enters through the front door NEVER COMES OPUT ALIVE!!!!!!! "
HARRY HINDSIGHT wrote on Oct 24, 2008 7:48 AM:
Ever think the young woman wanted to be Jane Doe? "
ladyalways wrote on Oct 24, 2008 7:31 AM:
Well are you going to offer support after they get off welfare in two years..because that is all that they will have..to find a job, child care, housing..ect...Cann't afford to take care of themselves...How are they going to support a child..That basically you are demanding that they have..You really need to see the entire picture...Life's picture... "
ladyalways wrote on Oct 24, 2008 7:26 AM: