34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Question 1 fails with Norfolk school officials




NORFOLK - Local school representatives are so concerned with the impact if voters Nov. 4 support the repeal of the state income tax, school committee members this past week held a public hearing on the ballot question.

There has been much debate within Massachusetts cities and towns over the referendum, and that was evident at the hearing as both sides presented their cases.

A "yes" vote would eliminate $12.6 billion of the commonwealth's budget, and with it, a chunk of the state's "fiscal irresponsibility," according to Rich Aucoin, from the Committee for Small Government. This cut represents 27 percent of the state budget, returning an average of $3,700 to Massachusetts' taxpayers.

"It will be a breath of life into the state of Massachusetts' economy," said Aucoin. "People will consider that money theirs on Nov. 5 and go out and spend it," putting it back into the state economy.

The numbers and economy resuscitation are highly contested, however. Holly Merritt, a teacher at Olive Day School, contended people will not spend that money because their property taxes will soar as a result of state cuts to cities and towns. Merritt also said most people would not get that much back; people would only get back what they put in. Ellen Horton, a teacher at Freeman-Centennial School, said 40 percent of state money comes from income taxes, citing two Web sites against Question 1: www.masstaxpayers.org and votenoquestion1.com.

Based on town data, Horton estimated a Yes vote will mean a 60 percent cut in Norfolk's state funding. Already, the state cut the prison mitigation fund last week, said Merritt, who is afraid the state will hit Norfolk harder, since it is one of the commonwealth's wealthiest towns.

The school district would lose approximately $1.3 million in state funds, causing a reduction in staff, programs and supplies; this cut would also demand larger class sizes to keep up with budget cuts, opponents of the question said.

Additionally, the town would have to reconcile an estimated $477,416 loss, according to Town Administrator Jack Hathaway, forcing cuts across all town services, including public safety and public works.

"There is waste in every government budget, on every level," Aucoin said.

Whether the state and local budgets can be used more efficiently or property taxes will rise exponentially remains uncertain, but "that is my concern: we're going to be the ones who feel it," said Horton. "We will be the ones who suffer."

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » No comments posted. « Hide Comments

ncitizen wrote on Oct 28, 2008 8:30 AM:

" More scare tactics. No official statement has been made by the legislature that states where if any cuts will be made. It would make life easier for both sides if they did then we could argue the merits of the cut. Next time you hear that the sky is falling ask the person who said it to document the statement. This includes the newspapers and visual press. Otherwise this is an exercise in media manipulation that you are repeating. "

realist wrote on Oct 27, 2008 10:19 AM:

" When I said "your money" I meant the taxpayers not the politicians. "

realist wrote on Oct 27, 2008 10:18 AM:

" When Proposition 2 1/2 passed some 28 years ago the state decided to step in and give the town money it took from taxpayers through other means. (Income, sales, gasoline, etc). I would like to remind politicians that this magnanimous "state" aid we here about is just your money taken from a different pocket.
If cities and towns tried to live within their means then Question 1 would not have happened. "

HARRY HINDSIGHT wrote on Oct 27, 2008 7:36 AM:

" Why should the state distribute the wealth to other cities and towns? If I choose to live in Attleboro, I know my tax dollars are being spent on Attleboro schools, not going to support Hyde Park or Falmouth. My city should only provide the services that it's residents can support. Stop the hand outs to those that do not put into the system. Stop asking others to provide for you and provide for yourself. A community should only support what it can afford. That's the beauty of this country, you are able to choose where you want to live. You may not be able to move to where you want, but the oppertunity(?) is there. If you live in a poor town, you should have lesser services. Look at Rehoboth, they have less services. No town water, sewer and no full time fire department, does that mean their schools are sub par to Attleboro? "


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
 or