34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

End of the line for dog racing



A greyhound waits to race at Raynham-Taunton Dog Track on Wednesday. Greyhound racing will no longer be allowed in Massachusetts come 2010. (Staff photo by Mike George)




Patrons, workers worried in wake of vote to ban sport
RAYNHAM - At Raynham Park, the sun barely peaked through thin clouds early Wednesday afternoon, one day after Massachusetts voted to ban greyhound dog racing. The decision requires Raynham Park to shut down racing by Jan. 1, 2010.

Though it was business as usual at the races, and employees and patrons readied themselves for the 12:30 p.m. start of the first afternoon race, track employees were dismayed by passage of the Greyhound Protection Act, also known as Question 3 on the state ballot.

"Very, very subdued," track Superintendent Tom Clifford said, describing the mood among employees.

Raynham Park employs 650 to 700 part- and full-time employees, said Clifford, who lives in Rehoboth and has worked at the track for 32 years.

Most of those jobs would be lost, he said. "Not a whole lot salvageable. A lot of people who are long-term employees have been let down by fellow citizens."
"We genuinely do the right thing by the dogs," he said. "We do a great job taking care of our greyhounds and our customers. No greyhounds are euthanized. All are found loving homes."

Though there's been talk about other avenues for revenue at the track, such as slot machines, no plans have been set. There is interest in simulcast betting, but the mandate does not allow for simulcasts without live racing, Clifford said.

Other employees echoed Clifford's sentiments.

Cheryl Bonaparte, a 24-year employee from Raynham, became teary-eyed, saying she was "devastated."

"I'm from the typewriter age, not the computer age," she said.

Bonaparte is a parimutuel clerk, serving customers who place bets.

"I can't believe people voted that way, putting us out of work," she said. "I have a mortgage, a child in college. I haven't slept, crying all night."

Track announcer Chris Roberts of Raynham said the new law would not protect greyhounds, but simply cause them to be relocated to other states where adoption requirements are not as stringent. Roberts said the dogs are only raced until they are 4 years old, and he cited Raynham Park's 100 percent adoption rate.

"We like to think we're for the dogs. We care about the dogs," he said.

Roberts, a 10-year employee, said his work hours give him the flexibility to officiate at high school basketball and baseball games.
"Utter devastation" is how he described the ban, and wondered aloud "how someone from Framingham, Chicopee, Pittsfield could determine the loss of 1,200 jobs.

"You tell me, in this economy, where are the businesses to hire 1,000 people," he said. "These people are family. The saddest day will be the day these doors close."

Gerald Read from Swansea, who worked the polls on Tuesday in Fall River to persuade voters to reject the ban, said he began working at age 18 - 56 years ago - parking cars with his father. He works now as a parimutuel clerk five hours a day, six days a week.

"Where am I going to get a job now at 74," he said.

Not as angry, but still disappointed on Wednesday were some of the patrons at Raynham Park.

"I don't like it," said Clarence Thomas from Stoughton who has been coming to the track since the 1980s.

Thomas attends races four times a week. He works second shift at the Stop & Shop warehouse in Freetown, so his days are free.

"Me and the friends come down here and have a few beers, some relaxation," he said.

If the track closes, Thomas said he may go to Foxwoods. "Next best thing," he said.

Bob Collett, who lives in Mashpee part of the year and winters in Florida, has been coming to the track for 40 years.

"It's too bad," he said. "Now I'll probably have to live in Florida full-time to see them (greyhounds) live."

As the first race got underway, and the familiar "Here comes Rusty" blared from the speakers, Jack Eordekian looked at his program and the two tickets he just purchased.

"Too bad the vote turned out that way," he said, despite admitting he voted "yes" on Question 3 himself.

Eordekian said he voted for the ban because his 13-year-old granddaughter became active in the push to ban greyhound racing.

"You're doing the wrong thing, Papa, going to the race track," he said she told him.

"If I thought they were abusing dogs, I wouldn't come here," said the 82-year-old man from Watertown. "I did it for her. I didn't think my vote would make a difference."

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » No comments posted. « Hide Comments

ricknkim wrote on Nov 11, 2008 9:31 AM:

" All are not equal . . . that's where the looney PETA people attempt to wedge their extremist views into reality and wonder why nobody takes them serious. Of course the morons in Hollywood are the 1st to support PETA because they are, behind politicians, the farthest removed from reality. "

jose21 wrote on Nov 10, 2008 3:51 PM:

" saywhat - I finally trained my pet monkey to cook my dinner and clean my house and now you tell me that animal are not here to serve us? Where were you 9 months ago when monkey boot camp began? "

ricknkim wrote on Nov 10, 2008 9:40 AM:

" I have a leather couch, I eat tons of steak, hunt deer and worked on a farm where we kept hundreds of head of cows to milk. I still voted to ban dog racing and I am totally unapologetic.

Being on the top of the food chain and the utility use of animals is completely different than the entertainment use of them. "

saywhat wrote on Nov 7, 2008 1:28 PM:

" John1. You don't know me so you are not in a position to say what I wear or do. For the record, however, I DO NOT wear leather, am vegan, DO NOT have a leather couch or car interior. Animals are not here to serve you, my friend. All, including you, are equal. "

kingston73 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:54 PM:

" John, first of all, its sad when you need to resort to name calling, what are you, 5 years old? OK, let me see-dog shows are a single event, where the owner is with the dog for either the entire time or close to it, and the dog goes home at the end of the show. Riding horses is the same idea, racing them is different than riding them. Like I said before, your arguments don't make sense. Your race dogs aren't anybody's pets, they are in prison and forced to perform for a few years, until they are too slow or broken to run anymore. Is it a coincidence that many of the greyhounds I have seen adopted by people are somewhat neurotic and/or anti social? "

john1 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:45 PM:

" Kingston 73,

I'm not good at listeningYou are an idiot. It's funny how you wont comment on the other ways in which animals are used for entertainment. Dog shows, Horse back riding, etc. At times these events take place in stadiums. Oh by the way. Most animals were breed for utilitarian purposes. But since we no longer need them to hunt, maybe it doesn't make sense to keep them as pets either. "

hope2008 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:42 PM:

" To say that the people of Mass were fooled into voting to ban dog racing is insulting to our intelligence. The fact is that the brutal industry of dog racing failed to fool the people of Massachusetts again. Once again, lets see the injury and death statistics posted...you know, the ones that your own brutal industry supplied to the state. Hard to argue with your own statistics. You'll find another job within the gambling industry soon, I'm sure. In the reading of some of the blogs by some of you in the industry of dog racing, you sound like very angry people who seem to think that you should be exempt from the choices of a democratic vote. Lots of people have lost jobs. Do they make front page? Move on like the rest of us and find a job that the voters of Massachusetts don't find to be cruel. On any side of an election somebody wins and somebody loses. This is a step in the right direction for the dogs to win. We are all better human beings when any form of cruelty ends. "

kingston73 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:19 PM:

" Oh, and for the people who posted about the statistics constantly changing, tell me you haven't noticed the number of jobs lost due to this is changing as well. At first, some said 200-300, then it was about 700, now John says its 1000. I believe this proposition will be responsible for the collapse of the free world, before you know it there's going to be gangs of gay, tree hugging, pot smoking deviants at every street corner.... "

kingston73 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:16 PM:

" John, you're really not very good at listening, or at least you're not good at comprehension. To say that 8 dogs racing after a fake rabbit is "socializing" is like saying 2 boxers fighting in a ring is "play time". And a person locked up in prison gets "exercise" time, probably much more than your average office worker, but I bet he/she would rather be free than be well exercised. You make my point for me, I never said the dogs are being abused, just that their life for 3 or 4 years is a prison sentence. If you can't see the difference between a stadium of people being "entertained" by 8 dogs who are being forced to race and a person and their dog out in the yard playing fetch, you really are dense. And please, don't tell me these dogs were purpose bred to race, they were bred to hunt, as a pack, to help their owners get food. Yes, those dogs way back when were "used", but they lived a free life in the process. As for the fate of the race dogs, ideally racing dogs will eventually be banned across the country, like fighting dogs is. Somebody has to take the first step, otherwise it will never happen, so to argue that these dogs will just be shipped out to someplace else is pointless and absurd. "

john1 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:02 PM:

" Kingston 73,

To your point that dogs are pack animals. I agree. Every race there is a pack of 8. The leader wins and the others follow. "

john1 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 8:47 PM:

" Kingston 73,

My argument makes no sense! I'd like to think that I can speak first hand to this issue. I was an assistant trainer in the past and saw how these dogs were cared for. They were turned out 5 times daily and on many occasions were let to run free in an open field. That's more exercise than my jack-russel gets. Since we are now in the business of banning pets for the purpose of entertainment , why stop here. Maybe we should eliminate the westminster dog show or remove the equestrian aspect of the Olympics. Better yet maybe I should stop playing fetch with my own dog. I wouldn't want to be "entertained" by her. "

kingston73 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 7:40 PM:

" Saywhat, you better watch what you say, some on here might think that if you're for dogs and gay marriage, you might support communism too. OR they might link you to Bin Laden. I think its crazy that some people think the voters of MA where "fooled" into voting the wrong way...like we all just woke up, watched a few commercials, and went to vote. I personally don't think horse racing should be allowed either. Yes, some animals are used for food, some are used for working, but to use an animal simply for "entertainment" is just backwards and wrong, like the rednecks who like dog and rooster fighting. John, your arguments make no sense, nobody is saying "ban entertainment". But it doesn't take a genius to figure out that these greyhounds where being kept seperate, with minimal contact, for long periods of time. A dog is a pack animal and needs to be in a social group. No matter how well taken care of they are, and I believe they are taken care of very well, they are still in a 3-4 year prison sentence. I'd be interested to know how many of you on here right now actually voted, because if you didn't vote you have no right to complain... "

john1 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 7:27 PM:

" Saywhat,

Obama, the decriminalization of pot, gay marriage. You probably voted for the income tax. We just lost 1000 jobs. where will that revenue come from to support your enlightened liberal agenda. ( Oh by the way California must be more enlightened than we are.) You say that animals are not here to serve us. What type of shoes do you wear? what is the interior of your car. What is the couch you sit on made of? I guess you don't take the time to consider that. "

saywhat wrote on Nov 6, 2008 5:55 PM:

" There's a big difference between survival and entertainment John1. Dogs are forced to run simply to entertain us. But contrary to what you may think, animals are not here to serve us. Dog fights were once allowed, too. We've moved pass that. It's time we moved out of the dark ages. The ban on greyhound racing, combined with the decriminalization of pot, approval of gay marriage (in 2004) and election of Obama prove we truly are becoming a more enlightened society. "

john1 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 5:20 PM:

" To the prophet "saywhat",
You must be a vegetarian. Have you inhaled within the last minute. I hope you wear hemp shoes. Oh no you just inhaled some microrganism. that life form didn't choose to be consumed by you.Life is life. Using your train of thought. That microrganism has the same value as you. Probably does. Go live in your bubble. "

winnawinnachickendinna wrote on Nov 6, 2008 4:46 PM:

" Thanks for the encouragement Kim. I'll do my best. "

ricknkim wrote on Nov 6, 2008 4:32 PM:

" Put in the effort and get it back on the ballot hero. "

sunrise22 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 4:30 PM:

" Im interested to hear what facts I have gotten wrong. As for any issues I may have, they are with you telling everyone they got the wrong info. I know it sucks for people to lose their jobs, but whats done is done. You have a while to look around for something else. What, cant take someone arguing your point Buda? "

winnawinnachickendinna wrote on Nov 6, 2008 4:15 PM:

" Let's put it back on the ballot...with all information made public from both tracks. I'd also like to ban little league baseball. Half of those kids don't choose to play, they are made to, especially the kid that plays right field (who really wants to play with dolls or be the pitcher). Idiots. "

saywhat wrote on Nov 6, 2008 3:52 PM:

" TO John 1. The difference between Brady and a race dog is Brady CHOOSES whether he wants to be in the NFL. The dog doesn't have the luxury and instead, is subject to a life of slavery for human entertainment.
"Heaven is by favor; if it were by merit your dog would go in and you would stay out. Of all the creatures ever made [man] is the most detestable. Of the entire brood, he is the only one... that possesses malice. He is the only creature that inflicts pain for sport, knowing it to be pain. ~Mark Twain
"Life is life - whether in a cat, or dog or man. There is no difference there between a cat or a man. The idea of difference is a human conception for man's own advantage. ~Sri Aurobindo "

ricknkim wrote on Nov 6, 2008 3:50 PM:

" I don't think dogs are more important from people at all and by being against dog racing does not mean this at all. That sounds like a generic union argument.

I believe this won't take effect until 2010? I think there will be career counseling and job placement services also? Unemployment benefits in the worst case? The positions for the most part are non-skilled, therefore can't they transition to numerous other non-skilled jobs?

Not sure anyone likes to see people lose their job and concluding that those who supported the ballot question do is complete rubbish. "

buda1 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 3:35 PM:

" It would appear you have some issues to workout there sunrise oh and yes get your facts straight "

sunrise22 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 3:25 PM:

" buda1,

you think that everyone got their info based on "tainted info," why do you keep saying that? You think that YOUR ideas and info are the straight truth? And with this whole thing you said about adoption...why dont you stop contributing to the overpopulation of dogs? Oh..is it about how much money you make off of one of those labs? And yes, in this case, I belive the dogs are more important. If they were taken care of, I wouldnt have voted yes. "

buda1 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 2:58 PM:

" people don't loose I mean lose thier jobs everyday due to a question on a ballot that was put there on tainted information, unemployment is at an all time high and you voted people out of work and yet you are "pleased with the results" so what your saying is that dogs are more important than people??? "

ricknkim wrote on Nov 6, 2008 2:54 PM:

" That's the spirit "winnawinnachickendinna" - when you don't agree, just call them names and throw around some insults. Way to go tough guy, all are impressed! "

dayrider wrote on Nov 6, 2008 2:01 PM:

" It is not the end of the world. It is unfortunate that so many people had to loose their jobs. There have been thousands of people who have lost their jobs, some are still looking for employment and others have been lucky to find jobs. When the Taunton Racetrack went out of business I don't recall all this uproar. It was taken over by an auto auction business. Don't you think the wheels are turning to find a business that we go into the Raynham Ractrack. That is prime land, it would be perfect for many different business. If the unemployed people really want a job after the track closes, they will find a job. Everyone should just relax a little and start thinking about what they would like to do after. They can retire or find another job. Those who can't find a job, I don't mind supporting with my tax dollars for unemplyment. Good luck to the employees and think positive. There is life after the racetrack. "

sunrise22 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:46 PM:

" And I'm very pleased with the result. "

sunrise22 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:42 PM:

" hardhearted..

You see, horse racing makes soooo much money, that there will never be a vote on wheather or not to keep it. Just like how cigarettes and porn will never be illegal. So since this industry IS going downhill, we were allowed to vote on it. "

ricknkim wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:40 PM:

" Yes John, not only have I been to cattle ranches, I grew-up in farm country and worked in farming as a youth. I am quite familiar with how they are housed in pens and cages. They represent food on my table. Greyhounds are simply caged for us to watch and bet on for entertainment purposes - completely different set of circumstances plain and simple.

I hunt for recreation yes, but eat the meat that I would otherwise procure at the grocery store. I'm not eating any more or less than I would if I did not hunt.

Much land is now off-limits to hunting. I make other arrangements by traveling out of state to hunt on a friends spread or on state land where it is legal. If it were made impossible to hunt legally, I'd either move or make trips to where I could hunt as part of my vacation.

I'm not gloating that it passed, I am pleased though. If it hadn't passed I would have accepted that, not call people idiots because they won?? Whether it is 18 hours a day or 20 - I still view it as wrong. "

mmarcia wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:29 PM:

" The pictures that thse groups (Grey2K and the SPCA) weren't taken in Mass - they weren't even taken in the US! The dogs they choose to show are from South America, Latin America and China - areas where they dogs aren't pets, they're dinner. They should to to China and stop that!

So, are these groups going to find job for the 1,000 or so direct employees- and the dozens of related businesses that will suffer? "

buda1 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:07 PM:

" Someone should file a lawsuit against the MSPCA "

john1 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:06 PM:

" To ricknkim,
Have you ever been to a dairy or a chicken farm? Those animals live in very tight quarters. I am sure that some pets sleep in cages .I didn't know that we as a society are against entertainment. Do you hunt because there isn't enough food at the grocery store. Or is hunting your form of entertainment. I am not against hunting. But how upset would you be if the Governent decided to close all lands to hunting because they arbitrarily decided that hunting was inhumane. Many people enjoy watching dogs and horses race. Many people derive their incomes from racing. Should we set out on an agenda to ban all forms of entertainment. Imagine the economic consequencs of that. "

buda1 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:04 PM:

" Is it possible for stats to be bias and believable at the same time I'll have to look that one up. When this question first came to light it was stated that the dogs were kept in cages for up to 18 hours a day apparently there wasn't enough outrage so they changed it to 20 hours a day children lie to get what they want also. I breed labs and for pets and when I sell the puppies I tell the owners to crate train it is a natural environment for dogs and they feel safe. You people (with nothing better to do) put a question on a ballot that will effect 100's of peoples lives and livleyhoods with nothing more than tainted information you should be ashamed of yourselves instead you are gloating I don't get it "

hardhearted wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:23 PM:

" I went to the MSPCA site and the related links. Not what I would call unbiased information.
If the industry was dieing, why did we need this law? Just because you don't go to the track or you "don't agree" with the concept of dog racing it's okay to put people out of work?
Have you seen a racehorse stall? Not very large when you consider the size of a horse and the fact that they like to run. I have yet to see a move to ban horse racing? "

ricknkim wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:12 PM:

" Cow's are milked and chickens lay eggs to provide food for the leader on the food chain. Dog's are bread and put into cages for entertainment. That is the difference. "

sunrise22 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:05 PM:

" If you go onto the MSPCA Website you can see that these dogs are not taken care of very well. They are put in cages that they cant even turn around in for 20 hours at a time. They are fed raw meat that is deemed unfit for humans, which puts them at risk for disease. A dog tested positive twice for cocaine at Wonderland Park in two years. And I won't even get into the statistics on the injuries reported. These stats might be bias but I belive that they are true. Now I know it sucks to lose your job, but come on, you have until 2010 to find another one. Most people don't get that. And to top it off I read that there as been a steady decline of money bet on the dogs since 2002. They are calling dog racing a dying industry. If these dogs were taken care of in a better way, this would not be happening. "

john1 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:04 PM:

" This is a disgrace. Legislating individuals and families out of work and into the unemployment when our economy is on the brink of disaster is shameful. Voting to eliminate greyhound racing is only the first step on the bleeding hearts agenda. I think it is safe to say that horseracing is next. Greyhounds are athletes.Running is what nature intended them to do. They are no less of an athlete than Tom Brady is. Should we eliminate the National Football League because he and others sustained injuries? What about the Olympics? What about any form of physical activity that we may or may not injure ourselves doing. For those that say that we have a choice and that animals do not. I would counter and say that we make choices for animals everyday. Like the cow that we milk or the chicken whose eggs that we collect. These animals do not have a choice. We decide for them. Massachusets has adopted a zero euthanization policy for greyhounds. It ensures that all retired runners are adopted and placed in caring homes. If these individuals who put this question on the ballot genuinely care about animals, I hope that they dont eat meat, drink milk or God forbid have a leather sofa. I wonder what the fate was of those animals? Can you say double standard? "

ricknkim wrote on Nov 6, 2008 11:24 AM:

" I'm a hunter and totally understand my position on the food chain (yes, I eat everything I shoot). I am also an opponent of PETA as they are an extremist group out of touch with reality. However, I did vote to outlaw dog racing. I personally don't agree with the breeding of dogs and making them live in cages for our entertainment use. "

sabdab wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:59 AM:

" Yes, these dogs are bread for running, that's what they do and what they love. They are not caged in a small area for 20 hours a day, but they are treated like animals (which they are).
Anyone who has purchased a puppy in the last 10 years has been told to crate train the puppy. This means putting your puppy in the crate when not being walked, fed or played with. They sleep in the crate, stay in the crate during the day while everyone is at work... how many hours a day does that equate to??? (8-10 hours at night, 8-10 hours during the day)... hummmmmm is this inhumane? And if you crate train your puppy, they wont give it up easily... they will use it for years and years if you let them.
The fact is, dogs like to have a small area they feel safe in, they like to curl up where they know they won't get spooked, stepped on, distrubed etc.
If someone decides to go into greyhound racing, how much do you think they pay for the dog, vet, care??? Your not going to abuse something that is an investment of tens of thousands of dollars... and this is not going to end racing... they will just move to where the tracks are and leave MASS with less revenue again. MASS lost out on this deal. "

hardhearted wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:50 AM:

" I agree that these dogs are bred for running. They like to run. These are not bred for being carried around like accessories.
What's next-- ban the police from using dogs for crowd control, hunting suspects, finding lost kids and bomb sniffing?
How many cops and servicemen have been saved by working dogs? Those dogs work under harsher conditions than greyhounds.

Just because some extremists phony up some documents about cruelty to dogs in other parts of the world we have to shut down humane, tax-paying businesses.
I also agree with the writers that say this is not about dogs but rather a clash of classes. If they were worried about animal cruelty why haven't they gone against horse racing? "

rcharles wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:34 AM:

" These dogs are bred for racing and I just wonder what will happen to the dogs now, are they going to be put down? They make wonderful pets, I have 2 myself. The people that voted to stop the racing are probably the same one's that voted to decriminalize pot. What a joke! I'm astonished at the intelligence of some people or in this case, the lack of. "

ricknkim wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:15 AM:

" I think every one of you who stopped using typewriters and caused the loss of jobs to thousands of workers in that industry ought to be ashamed of yourselves . . . also, you better think twice before you start eating healthy, stop smoking and exercising - you may put several cardiologists in the unemployment line. And the audacity of those who contributed to the death of the horse and buggy industy by purchasing automobiles! "

buda1 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:04 AM:

" So Hope2008 how many greyhounds are you adopting I think people like you have way too much time on your hands yeah so what people lost there jobs what are you guys going after next bird watching don't they deserve there privacy what a joke "

Hojo20 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 8:38 AM:

" Must be nice for voters to lay off other people. Talk about being heartless. "

hope2008 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 8:28 AM:

" That these people have lost there jobs is of course unfortunate, but no more so than the many other people in the country that have lost their jobs. I lost mine in May. You go forward and find another - just like I had to.
Now, in the supposed name of balanced journalism, lets see the mandated state report of racing dogs injuries and deaths, printed on the front page of the Sun. Lets get a close up look at the real tragedy. This is a brutal industry and the voters of Massachusetts did their homework, studied the reports on the industry and voted to end this barbaric and outdated so-called "sport." It's about time. So....lets see the report. Otherwise, you can read it online. "

HARRY HINDSIGHT wrote on Nov 6, 2008 7:50 AM:

" It looks like the owners of the dog tracks have just gotten the green light to install slots. With no live dog racing, there cannot be simulcast, so the people of the state have voted these owners out of business.
Wasn't the dog tracks also tied into the lottery? So now the state will have the lost revenue from dog racing, just how will they make that money up? I think a casino comming to a former dog track near you. Too bad the Tauton track burnt / got torn down, it would be another great venue with pleanty of parking! "

outfall1945 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 6:16 AM:

" why not do what they did with the seat belt law XXXX the voters. we are fast becomoing a nazi type of government "


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
 or