34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Mayor wants ARA head ousted




ATTLEBORO - Mayor Kevin Dumas laid the failure of the industrial business park project squarely at the feet of Attleboro Redevelopment Authority Executive Director Michael Milanoski Tuesday night and called for his immediate resignation.

The ARA board would have to ask for the resignation because Milanoski works for it.

Dumas took the action before the city council Tuesday in the wake of a report issued last week by a special committee he formed to investigate the financial failures of the ARA.

The industrial business park project is $4.2 million in debt and, according to the special committee, there is no way for it to become solvent.

Dumas said the cash crisis is the result of mismanagement by Milanoski, although he never mentioned him by name in the four-page statement. He referred to Milanoski only as the executive director. He said Milanoski failed to provide information needed by the board for proper oversight.

"The decisions of a board of directors are only as good as the information they have been provided with," Dumas said.

The lack of communication of crucial information should lead to Milanoski's resignation, he said.

"I cannot escape the fact that the financial stability of the ARA and particularly the IBP project have suffered greatly, perhaps irretrievably, under the management of this executive director," Dumas said.

"Therefore this evening I am calling on the ARA board of directors to demand the immediate resignation of its executive director."

Dumas said he would hire an economic development director who would also serve as the ARA executive director and would open discussions with creditors to find a way to settle the debts.

ARA Chairman Benton Keene III said the board as a group will decide what to do. But he seemed to be leaning toward a change.

"It's a tough situation, but if a change is needed it's usually the top person who is sacrificed," he said. "It's unfortunate it's come to this."

Meanwhile, earlier in the day, the ARA board issued a statement rejecting the conclusions of the task force report, which criticized Milanoski. In a seven-page news release the ARA found fault with the committee's financial analysis.

"We the Attleboro Redevelopment Authority board of directors find the report flawed beyond a reasonable doubt and unanimously reject its conclusions," it said. Milanoski declined to comment until he has read the mayor's statement.

 


splumb wrote on Dec 2, 2008 4:56 PM:

" ricknkim: The Executive Director of the ARA reported the figures, and chose not to challenge them until after the panel was dissolved.

He announced his plans to raise suspicions about the figures reported, just as he is doing, several weeks ago.

You are dealing with a man who intentionally violated the terms of HUD grants, which as a result, had to be paid back. He and he alone is responsible for their insolvency.

I didn't say he was dumb as a stump, just a con-artist. His MO has always been to divide the residents from each other, as well as from their freely elected officials.

Don't let him succeed. "

been there wrote on Dec 2, 2008 12:23 PM:

" i-vote:This is the same thing you posted over the w/e. Then you pledged to us that you would personally sit with the mayor as well as the ARA, because you didn't trust any of the facts we've all lived with for the past decade.

How did you make out? "

ricknkim wrote on Dec 2, 2008 9:06 AM:

" I read the complete ARA response also and agree that there are way too many errors with numbers to be a slam dunk case. I am wondering if this was complacency on the part of the panel or a case of not getting clear and concise data/figures from the ARA? "

i-vote wrote on Dec 2, 2008 8:01 AM:

" I admit I was complacent and on the band wagon with the general public over the last few months for canning the ARA and their director as reported. I assumed the ARA response to the Mayors task force was just another he said / she said or CYA. But it now looks like city hall or the corner office may be living in a glass house along with the ARA.

I independently reviewed as much information as I have been able to find. I have to say I was surprised to verify a few of the overstated numbers in the Task Force report. Why were they overstated when there was a CPA on the committee, what was the purpose of this error? How does overstating some, any, or just one of the numbers help me as a taxpayer and voter? What about trust? The Mayor promised with his speech this week that he would bring transparency, accountability, and credibility! Was the Mayor hoodwinked by the Task Force authors?

The last time a CEO was hoodwinked, it was our very own George Bush by his decision maker Dick Cheney. He led us into war based on bogus and deceptive information in Iraq and killed thousands of US men and women.

The first draft of the Task Force Report was written by Jack Jacobi and Berry LaCasse. I hope these two are not Attleboros version of Cheney. "

splumb wrote on Dec 1, 2008 12:23 PM:

" ricknkim: judy took away the consiquences of oversight. There are no reprocussions for this group.

I wonder how many people actually wrote McGovern to express concern for his continued support for the IBP?

If he doesn't hear from us, the ARA has card blanche, leaving our elected officials powerless. "

richardm wrote on Dec 1, 2008 12:18 PM:

" Hindsight is always 20/20 "ricknkim".

If the recent op-ed page letter by Mr. Voltera is any indication, the mayor may be in for a battle with the ARA and a more "error-free" report by the panel would have suited his cause better. "

ricknkim wrote on Dec 1, 2008 10:02 AM:

" Yes & No - both the mayor and council could have demanded more in terms of progress reports and financial reporting. I think the council only recently started the hearings with the ARA. And if the mayor allotted money/grants to the ARA, there should have been certain benchmarks/criteria/milestones to be met.

With that said, I think more blame should be put on those who originally thought of and approved this project. The profitability and projections should have been much more highly scrutinized with contingencies agreed upon long ago, not now that it is failing. And of course, the ARA management has been less than forthcoming of accurate data and out to lunch on true project management. Just my opinion of course. "

splumb wrote on Dec 1, 2008 9:15 AM:

" ricknkim: I understand you inclination. It makes perfect sense. The problem is that they are powerless. They had to assign a panel to give a recommendation. This allowed the mayor to request that the ARA act.
Unless I'm wrong the mayor and council are powerless against tis board.

We really stepped in it back when the city (Mayor Robbins) asked for their services. "

ricknkim wrote on Nov 30, 2008 7:41 PM:

" I agree, there is some blame to be shared by the current mayor and council but the lion's share is ARA management. "

splumb wrote on Nov 27, 2008 1:10 PM:

" Mike you're absolutely right. We should all look at what we have and be thankful.

We can all use a break.

God Bless all. "

margo wrote on Nov 27, 2008 12:44 PM:

" lol, mike. That was really funny about our mayor.

Splumb, I don't know much about the former mayor. Sorry. "

mike wrote on Nov 27, 2008 12:12 PM:

" Come on Margo and Bear...the mayor is doing a really great job (especially in these times). Go eat some turkey and shut your computers off! Happy Thanksgiving!!!! "

splumb wrote on Nov 27, 2008 12:08 PM:

" margo: Come on now, let's not blame Judy. Well, never mind, she was the most influential party here. Let's re-elect, then fire her. :) "

splumb wrote on Nov 27, 2008 11:58 AM:

" I don't know bear. Do you think it appropriate for a US congressman to take sides against the mayor? McGovern did, after lobbying for the earmarks for this fiasco. Perhaps you should contact him. "

bear wrote on Nov 27, 2008 11:24 AM:

" Well look who finally woke up to the ARA! It's about time this mayor did the right thing. Think it was politically motivated...you bet. "

margo wrote on Nov 27, 2008 10:38 AM:

" The mayor decides who gets the HUD block grant funds, then signs the request to HUD. For several years, funds went to the ARA. The mayor also went before the council several time making requests for the ARA. "

attleboro's own wrote on Nov 27, 2008 10:11 AM:

" I don't think the mayor signs ARA documents, but Margo is correct that there's plenty of blame to go around including the current mayor's predecessor.
Milanoski is the fall guy and not without justification. But the ARA board, the mayor and the city council all share culpability here.
The basic premise of the park was the fuzzy notion that if we build it businesses will come. That false premise is still being put forward as we see from Max Volterra's recent guest column. There is no demand. There are vacancies in the old industrial park, the Northeast Industrial Park and in North Attleboro. Lots of vacant factory buildings and lots of easily buildable industrial land. Until these are occupied, let's not spend another penny on the IBP.
We're all bearing witness to the fundamental flaw in government. The impetus to do something always trumps doing nothing; and, often, doing nothing is the best thing. "

kim allard wrote on Nov 26, 2008 8:18 PM:

" http://thesunchronicle.ning.com/profile/KimberlyAllardAttleboroCityCouncilor

Sorry the link won't highlight but here it is again. "

kim allard wrote on Nov 26, 2008 6:06 PM:

" I posted it in the Sun Chronicle Online Community as shown below:

Check out Kimberly Allard Attleboro City Councilor's Page's profile
Link to online forum


Profile link:
Kimberly Allard Attleboro City Councilor's Page "

joehall wrote on Nov 26, 2008 5:59 PM:

" Kevin h - You said "Many in Attleboro and here at comment board knew the project was underwater long,long ago." Care to tell us all EXACTLY when that was??? "

joehall wrote on Nov 26, 2008 5:57 PM:

" Margo - You said "The mayor approves and signs many ARA documents". Care to give ONE example??? "

splumb wrote on Nov 26, 2008 5:16 PM:

" Hi Kim, How's things? Where is this document located?

Thanks! "

splumb wrote on Nov 26, 2008 5:14 PM:

" margo: I disagree with govt. funding the park, so in that respect you're right that others are responsible. Other than that, as the mayor points out, the Executive Director, runs the show. The problem is that he has been less than honest with, well, everyone.

If he tells you things are under control, there is some reason to believe him, unless you've had the good fortune of seeing the dark side of this individual, as some residents have. "

splumb wrote on Nov 26, 2008 5:04 PM:

" kevin h: I truly understand your skepticism, but you must be able to see the disconnect between what 99% of the letters to the editor since '2002, and the comments made last week by Rep McGovern after the report was made public: U.S. Rep. James McGovern, D-Worcester, who got an $800,000 earmark for the park to help build an access road, said local officials need to figure out a financial solution, but the industrial park remains a worthwhile goal.

"I'm a supporter of the industrial park and I want it to work," McGovern said, although he added he does not want to "micromanage" the city.

This had to be done delicately, as it appears McGovern put a lot on the line to make this work.

I hate to repeat, but a US congressional representative, trumps a city mayor. Suppose he digs his heels in, then what?

It may be best if he hears from us directly, so we become part of the solution, and the mayor isnt left out in the cold.

McGovern can be reached through his website http://mcgovern.house.gov/ "

kim allard wrote on Nov 26, 2008 4:38 PM:

" I have posted the Mayor's statement from the meeting lastnight in response to the Task Force findings. It is posted on the sun chronicle online community. "

attlebrockton wrote on Nov 26, 2008 4:17 PM:

" What happens if the board refuses to fire Milanoski? "

margo wrote on Nov 26, 2008 4:03 PM:

" So let's see, the mayor has been on the job for 4 years. Some on the ARA board have been there longer than that. Several city councilors have been on the council 4 years or longer. The maor approves and signs many ARA documents. The council approves them also. Yet, after all that has happened, the ARA's Executive Director is the only person responsible for this mess? C'mon boys. "

richardm wrote on Nov 26, 2008 3:51 PM:

" I think if you do an archival search of this site, you will find a number of articles showing the mayor at odds with the ARA/Milanoski.

I received a copy of the ARA's response to the panel's findings and posted a copy of it in the Community Forum blogs under Attleboro/Revitalization for all to review. It seems to me that we may be in for a good olde power struggle. I love the smell of dirty politics in the morning. "

kevin h. wrote on Nov 26, 2008 2:40 PM:

" From the Taskforce report:

"The commitee thinks the ARA was insolvent to the degree of approximately $355.000 in the spring of 2007. In May 2007 the ARA entered into a settlement and a purchase and sale with DJT realty for $1,950,000.00 which brought the deficit to $2,305,000.00 at that time."

The commitee also said that Milanowski did not submit written financial statement to the ARA board at regular meetings.

Many in Attleboro and here at comment board knew the project was underwater long,long ago. The mayor was MIA. Remember politics begins at home. "

splumb wrote on Nov 26, 2008 2:31 PM:

" ricknkim:I agree with your thoughts about getting this right..and that's just cya for wrongful termination. In addition, we have to understand just how much of a political struggle this is. US Rep McGovern was quoted by this paper as being a strong supporter of the IBP; After the panel's report was made public.

This is not a done deal by any means, so keep those cards and letters flowing to Rep McGovern, as well as the state reps. "

ricknkim wrote on Nov 26, 2008 1:59 PM:

" In our wonderful world of litigation, the mayor had to build a case of mismanagement . . . that was what the panel did. Otherwise you have wrongful termination, libel, etc. to deal with.

He's far from perfect but I the mayor is doing okay on this. "

mike wrote on Nov 26, 2008 11:04 AM:

" I second that splumb!!! To kevinh: Where can I pick up a pair of your "Hindsight 20/20" glasses for stocking stuffers this year. People like you wait until something is done right and then criticize it like you had complete clarity and could have done it better and sooner. Don't blame the mayor after he just took a huge step forward. Blame the ARA board members. The last line of this article shows they still don't get it.

The mayor did this the right way. He's using a scalpel not a hatchet. That is how I want my leader to act! "

splumb wrote on Nov 26, 2008 10:48 AM:

" kevin h.: The mayor had to tread on this lightly. A US rep, trumps a mayor. This is something that Mrs. Robbins would not have attempted.

This is a huge Thanksgiving victory, and one of the many things we have to be thankful for on this holiday.

Thank you mayor for walking this tightrope for us, and leaving us with some hope for the Christmas season. Nice job. "

kevin h. wrote on Nov 26, 2008 10:32 AM:

" From the Report to the MAYOR by the Taskforce on Attleboro Redevelopment Authority Industrial Business Park
November 19, 2008

"However, the Commitee concludes the ARA board, and its managers, did not adequately plan for reasonably forseeable contingencies. They also had unresonably optimistic expectations about lot sales and other sources of revenue."

Where have you been Mayor Dumas???? Your oversight amounts to non-feasance. "

mike wrote on Nov 26, 2008 10:07 AM:

" Fantastic Job, Mayor Dumas!!! "

doug wrote on Nov 26, 2008 10:06 AM:

" Reason, it was already a problem when he was elected.Robbins caused this mess. It's too bad she will miss out on the accountability!!!! "

LsoOfficer wrote on Nov 26, 2008 9:58 AM:

" Michael Milanoski Executive Director Attleboro Redevelopment Authority
Michael Milanoski
Name: Michael Milanoski
Title: Executive Director
Company: Attleboro Redevelopment Authority
Location: Attleboro, Mass.
Birthplace and year: Annapolis, Maryland - 1969
Family: Wife, Jenny; children, Michael Robert, 6 and Madeline Belle, 3
College: University of Massachusetts, major in architecture environmental and design;
Masters in Regional Planning, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
First job unrelated to your current field: Carpenter
First job in current field: Economic Development Planner for Town of Weymouth
What your firm does now and its plans for the future: The Attleboro Redevelopment
Authority is dedicated to improving the economic well-being of the City of Attleboro, and
continues to encourage the economic, physical and transportation growth through new
projects designed to ensure that Attleboro is a premier business location for years into the
future.
Hobbies: Woodworking and restoring historic 1790s home
Favorite book: "The Autobiogaphy of Benjamin Franklin"
Favorite movie: "Gone With The Wind"
Person you admire (outside of family): Warren Buffet
Keys to success: Taking bold actions and creating collaborative partnerships, while
focused on the objectives.
If you had to choose a different profession, what would it be? An inventor
Better to go back and try inventing more excuses. "

splumb wrote on Nov 26, 2008 9:41 AM:

" I am confused by the negative comments. The mayor has just taken a huge political risk, in opposition to US Congressman McGovern's recent quote in favor of the IBP. This announcement should be viewed as a positive development.

Its true that many of us have been warning of the issues surrounding Mr. Milanoskis actions for years, but lets be practical. Any reactions, which appear to be against a US congressional representatives wishes, may have made the situation much worse, leaving the ARA untouchable.

Take the small victories, and see how they work out. "

scooterlibby wrote on Nov 26, 2008 9:10 AM:

" Who pays with the mayor's plan to "open discussions with creditors to find a way to settle the debts"? "

LsoOfficer wrote on Nov 26, 2008 8:26 AM:

" I remember having a conversation with Mike back in 2001-02,there was some talk about the ARA using eminant domain to acquire some land that my brother owened off of County Street,and the term "impervious to pervious surface area" came into the conversation and Mike had no clue what we were talking about.Right there and then i new Mike was going to learn how to manage a construction project by trial and error. "

attlebrockton wrote on Nov 26, 2008 8:06 AM:

" I just drove by the Bronson building and the ARA is pilling sandbags up against the windows and mounting machine guns! The seige is on . "

Reason wrote on Nov 26, 2008 8:06 AM:

" Sorry mayor too late. You should have done something about the ARA before it became a problem. Politically it is a great move. No risk of anyone opposing your request now that the ARA is insolvent. "

attman63 wrote on Nov 26, 2008 7:51 AM:

" Thank you Mayor Dumas- "

HARRY HINDSIGHT wrote on Nov 26, 2008 7:31 AM:

" If Milanoski does step down, is his contract or terms of hire still require him to get a pay check? Simply put, if he steps down does the city still pay him something for leaving? "

chartley-sam wrote on Nov 26, 2008 7:10 AM:

" Opps... Now I hear that Automatic isn't hiring.... "

chartley-sam wrote on Nov 26, 2008 7:02 AM:

" Maybe Mr. Milanoski can get a job at Automatic in Taunton - I hear they are hiring. "

attlebrockton wrote on Nov 26, 2008 5:58 AM:

" It appears to be on! The Mayor showed leadership skills last night. Not only did he call for the resignation of the Exec director he assumed control of the projects going forward .I believe he has rightly staked his political future on the outcome of this power struggle with the ARA. In the end the ARA board ,who the Mayor gave an out too, will do the prudent thing and fire the Exec director and we can all take a deep breath and reset.My only hope is when they open up the ARA's books they don't find more problems than already laid out in the task force report. "


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
 or