34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

It's game over for Mansfield High football



Mansfield football players raise the Don Currivan trophy after beating Foxboro in the Thanksgiving Day game. (Staff file photo by Mike George)




Player found to be ineligible; team forfeits playoff against Feehan
MANSFIELD - The Mansfield High School football team has been forced to forfeit tonight's scheduled MIAA Division 2 playoff game against Bishop Feehan High after officials learned that Mansfield had used an ineligible player through the course of the 2008 season.

The 11th-hour decision was made by the MIAA Football Committee and administrators at Mansfield High. The game against Feehan had been scheduled for 5:15 p.m. at Bridgewater-Raynham Regional High School.

According to school sources, Mansfield High School today will seek a court order to allow the team to play this evening.

The MIAA decision to forfeit was made after the Hornets concluded their two-hour practice session at Alumni Field early Monday evening and was not immediately made known to members of the Mansfield team.

Mansfield Coach Mike Redding declined to name the player.
"The Mansfield High School football program had a player participate in two games. Each game was about three plays at the very end of the game," Redding said. "The player in question, without the knowledge of the coaching staff or the athletic department, had entered his fifth year of high school. When the coaching staff became aware of the student's fifth year, which was around the Thanksgiving Day holiday, on the next school day, Dec. 1, they self-reported it to the athletic director, who reported it to the MIAA in hopes that we would have a meeting or conference to sort out the facts.

"At this point, Mansfield has had no opportunity to sit down with all of the parties involved, to put together an official report and find out if an actual violation has taken place."

Efforts by The Sun Chronicle to reach first-year Athletic Director Patrick Burns were unsuccessful.

The player in question had transferred into the Mansfield school system at the outset of the academic year. However, his transcript and the paperwork for eligibility to be cleared for a waiver was never processed by Mansfield High School.

Notice of the ineligible player surfaced prior to the Thanksgiving football game in which Mansfield beat Foxboro. Subsequently, Burns contacted the MIAA for a clarification and received word of the forfeiture late Monday.

"I thought that I had heard it all - until now," said Dighton-Rehoboth Regional High football coach Dave Driscoll, the 2006 President of the Mass. Football Coaches Association. "I've never heard of such a situation - and why did someone just find out a day before the game?"

Also unconfirmed was a court order to be sought by Mansfield High School to appeal the MIAA's decision to have the Hornets forfeit the game.

"There was no preparation time, no chance to scout or get film," Paul Wetzel of the MIAA said when reached at home. "We felt the safety issue was (also) very important.

"It's not the player's fault," Wetzel said. "It's the school administration's. The punishment is what it is."

By the MIAA decisions, North Attleboro is declared the Hockomock League champion with a 7-1 league record.
"I don't know the details, but we don't enjoy it," said Bishop Feehan High School President Chris Servant, who with Principal Bill Runey and Athletic Director Paul O'Boy, received word of the forfeiture just before 7 p.m. Monday.

The forfeiture sends the defending MIAA Division 2 Super Bowl champion Shamrocks (9-1) into Saturday's title game at Gillette Stadium in Foxboro against the winner of the other MIAA Division 2 playoff game between Walpole and Reading.

"We certainly don't feel good about this, but what's strange is this final hour decision," Servant said. "Did somebody blow the whistle on this?"

Because Mansfield was ruled ineligible to represent the Hockomock League and compete in the Division 2 playoff game, there loomed the possibility that the runner-up Rocketeers of North Attleboro would instead represent the league and have a rematch game with Bishop Feehan.

However, the opportunity never presented itself according to North coach Kurt Kummer.

"We could have played, we would have played, but the MIAA said that we can't - they had made their decision," Kummer said. "The MIAA had made the decision that Bishop Feehan would get a bye to the Super Bowl."

It was North's contention that because they had finished second to Mansfield during the course of the Hockomock League season, they would ably represent the league.

"Nobody was purposely cheating to gain an advantage," Kummer said. "But, how do you now tell the kids on the Mansfield High football team, hours before the game, that they can't compete for a championship. And if not them, why not us?"

Administrators, according to Servant, found it difficult to discern that an ineligible player - for whatever reason, living out of town, age or academics - would not have been discovered earlier in the season, less than a day before a Final Four playoff game.

"If he was ineligible for game No. 1, would he not be ineligible for games 2, 3 and 4?" Servant asked. "It doesn't make sense."

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » No comments posted. « Hide Comments

sillyme wrote on Dec 2, 2008 5:01 PM:

" THEY ARE PLAYING
GO MANSFIELD!!!!!!!!!! "

SILLYME wrote on Dec 2, 2008 4:59 PM:

" GO MANSFIELD
THEY ARE PLAYING "

ajohnson32 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 4:58 PM:

" If it was so easy I guess the judge wouldn't have to deliberate. "

sillyme wrote on Dec 2, 2008 4:54 PM:

" let the boys play their game!!!! Let the score determine who goes to the superbowl not the MIAA!!!!!!!!! I have seen so many things get swept under the carpet in the 8 years my children have played sports at HS this is minor... punish the coach not the BOYS "

offended wrote on Dec 2, 2008 4:50 PM:

" the poor kids....I hope they let them play. Is it still scheduled for 5:15? "

joetheplumber wrote on Dec 2, 2008 4:36 PM:

" The judge is still deliberating! "

offended wrote on Dec 2, 2008 4:19 PM:

" does anyone know what happened in court? "

fbwizard wrote on Dec 2, 2008 3:59 PM:

" MGAlum, no one is denying that there is a lot of good that can come out of sports and playing football, or that in many cases the coaches do a lot for the players. But you are naive to think this is just for the players. This is also exposure for the coaches and to inflate the egos of everyone who has so much emotional investment in the football team.

We may disagree about the extent of the violation but the bottom line is that they did wrong and should pay the price. That would be the best lesson these kids could ever learn. The greater problem here is the cult mentality that goes along with support of some of the local high school programs (including my alma mater of Feehan, which has not covered itself in glory at times either), which encourages blind devotion to them and a willingness to try to excuse almost anything (as evidenced by the emotions of some that have posted here). "

joetheplumber wrote on Dec 2, 2008 3:55 PM:

" A great coach, but its not that surprising that Mansfield coach Mike Redding might have bent/ignored the rules. Only last month, ignoring the the school's no-tolerance policy for substance use, he did not suspend several Freshman football players caught drinking at a player's house and allowed them to continuing playing in order for the team to place first in the league standings.

Let the boys play tonight and suspend the coach and AD. "

mansfieldGridAlum wrote on Dec 2, 2008 3:47 PM:

" FBwizard,
They are playing these games to give these kids an opportunity most programs would never get. the KIDS are getting exposure. If Coach Redding wanted to leave, he had MANY opportunities in the past. If you knew the people involved you would find out all the TIME spent trying to help these kids get to a position to better themselves thru continuing education. NOT JUST football.
but its a fact, sports can be a vehicle to bigger and better things for these kids. So its exposure for the STUDENTS! "

mansfieldGridAlum wrote on Dec 2, 2008 3:42 PM:

" The rule should be:
a student has four years of eligibilty as long as he/she is no older than 18 at the time the season begins. "

fbwizard wrote on Dec 2, 2008 3:40 PM:

" Mark, I live in Mansfield and am aware of his length of service but just because he's been there for 20 years doesn't mean that he isn't looking to move up. Why are they playing teams from Cali or other states if at least part of the motivation isn't to get some exposure for himself? If they are looking for quality competition then certainly there are enough good teams in Southern NE who could come in and give them a game?

Another admittedly unsubstantiated allegation, but food for thought: is it possible that someone had the goods on this violation, was threatening to expose it, and the AD/coach came forward to inoculate themselves?

Some programs would have voluntarily forfeited the games. That is a lot to ask in this case I agree but that would demonstrate true contrition.

All that said, I think the game should be played until this is all sorted out. If the MIAA wins they can strip Mansfield of the title. The problem with not playing is if Mansfield is acquitted there's no going back and playing the game after the fact. "

mansfieldGridAlum wrote on Dec 2, 2008 3:38 PM:

" He never played football before.
you people out there are trying to make it out that he was some sort of "ringer"
Get the Facts! Coach Redding is trying to set an example. He spoke up
He did not have to. No one would have ever known. You people are crucifying a guy who has integrity. I cant believe how quick everyone out there is to make this out to be cheating. You all realize that if the rule followed the NCAA. He would have been elegible. "

mansfieldGridAlum wrote on Dec 2, 2008 3:35 PM:

" the Mansfield Coach did not have to say anything at all. He could have just kept on playing and if anyone spoke up that one kid on his team wasnt elegible because an MIAA rule states that you only have 4 years from the time your a freshman to be elegible for sports. He was ALWAYS a mansfield kid. He dropped out his junior year. The guidance dept said he was elegible. Why is everyone turning this into something sinister? "

sinbad wrote on Dec 2, 2008 3:17 PM:

" bfshamrocks09...that is well said...better than all the rest of us on here...I hope the judge and lawyers can see it that way....just like Mansfield, your shamrocks are a class act also. "

bfshamrocks09 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 3:10 PM:

" I'm a senior at Feehan (09 supah fine!) and although it'd be great to see my team in the super bowl, I think I speak on behalf of everyone when I say not like this. Mansfield made an understandable mistake - a mistake that caused no victories, no points, nothing. A public apology would suffice in my mind, not a forced forfeit. The punishment does not match the crime in this situation. They made a mistake. I say play the game; let the points decide who deserves to win, not the rules of the MIAA. (As we all know the MIAA isn't that great when it comes to anything - they're all about money, not about the kids/games - but that's a different story all together) I hope to see a great game tonight, and go shamrocks! We don't need to be given a victory - we can earn our own. "

BT1957 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 2:48 PM:

" This game is not going to happen. Not today not ever. This is a royal town school admin blunder that raising the taxes can not fix. Accountability does not exsist at this level. Nice move school admin. only 3 weeks to your next paid vacation. "

na2 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 2:39 PM:

" ...in all seriousness I do feel bad for these kids. I hope something happens. "

na2 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 2:28 PM:

" What's really happening is they are punishing these kids for having a great season, the hock is a very intense schedule, more intense than most have to go through. I am from NA and I am an NA fan, but shouldn't the coaches/admins have to deal with this? I understand the team concept, but its not like they RECRUITED (cough, cough) this kid to come play there. (thats a whole other subject and irrelevant I know) But let some one play, even if its NA who just lost to Attleboro....and lost to mansfield and feehan....but woulnd't that be a story and an eye opener if NA were to win it all...... aka...extend the playoffs....... "

jose21 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 2:10 PM:

" I say let them play, work out the details later. Lets see who the best team is. If Mansfield is dq'd then so be it, but let them meet on the field and play a game, regardless of if that game determines who moves on or not.

And to Hojo - I hope you're under 18 buddy... "

Scooterlibby wrote on Dec 2, 2008 1:59 PM:

" My only question is when did Coach Redding and/or the Athletic Director know of the problem and what did they do at that time? Did they know in Sept. or Oct. and do nothing or did they truly only learn last week and in light of anticipating a problem decided to self report? "

mnsfld08 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 1:42 PM:

" cc1219 has a good point. If Mansfield was trying to hide something why did the report it themselves?

How many times has this gone unreported I wonder? "

ajohnson32 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 1:36 PM:

" The Patriots on a much higher level got caught cheating and were still able to play there games ...including the Superbowl.. How is punishing the students going to accomplish anything other than saying you broke a rule and that is it !you lose... I guess that's why there going to court . "

kaptin wrote on Dec 2, 2008 1:29 PM:

" The Mansfield players are being "punished" because their program violated rules, knowingly or not. It is unfortunate that their season has to end this way, but life isn't fair. Hopefully, this will serve as a lesson to last a lifetime for these young men: If you break the rules, you pay the price. I know, they did not personally violate any rules. But someday, in the real world, these boys will have to make choices and decisions as fathers, bosses, etc. Maybe this situation will help them realize how their decisions have far reaching consequences. Letting Mansfield play would be just another signal that it's OK to break the rules as long as you have good intentions. Hold the coach and any other responsible parties accountable for the crushing disappointment suffered by the players. "

sinbad wrote on Dec 2, 2008 1:03 PM:

" There are opinions on both sides of the matter that have merit. However, anyone who insinuates that Coach Redding or any of his staff would knowingly violate any rules simply don't know what they are talking about. "

cc1219 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 12:48 PM:

" And one more thing the coaches self reported themselves. They were honest and told the truth. Many people are saying to make an example for the kids but lets be serious what kind of example are we making, to not tell the truth, to lie and win. NO WAY! those coaches taught those boys to be honest and sportsmen-like and on or off the field they continue to show that. "

Mark M. Farinella wrote on Dec 2, 2008 12:45 PM:

" fbwizard: Mike Redding has been the coach at Mansfield for more than 20 years. Don't you think that he would have left long ago if that was his intention? You're leaping to inaccurate conclusions. "

cc1219 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 12:44 PM:

" I do not understand! Why should the boys be punished for a mistake made by the staff at MHS. Those boys worked all season to be the best and as we all know they proved themselves that. I think everyone needs to remember what their mom told them when they were young, there is no "I" in team. It doesn't take one kid to win a Championship. There are over 70 kids that the AD let down to at least make it up to them LET THEM PLAY! "

fbwizard wrote on Dec 2, 2008 12:39 PM:

" Anyone who believes Redding's or the AD's protestations of innocence is kidding themselves. This is what happens when a coach is more interested in getting a college job or a school is trying to become a big time football program in a small time town. I feel bad for the other kids but maybe this punishment will be a spur for all schools to do their jobs. "

ajohnson32 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 12:30 PM:

" Some people get pulled over for speeding and just get a warning.... The law says there should be a fine.. There are always circumstances that are different.In this case there should be a warning due to the circumstances. "

rockomom wrote on Dec 2, 2008 12:27 PM:

" It is amazing how astonished the staff at Feehan sounds that thing like this could not be determined earlier. Wht dosen't someone ask them or their AD why none of his Football Players were not suspended from the game for being caught drinking, while member of all the other fall and winter programs have memebers suspended for upcoming GAMES!!!! It is all about the Football team!!! "

realist wrote on Dec 2, 2008 12:21 PM:

" I can't believe the number of people who say the rules don't matter or it wasn't intentional. It is a bad break that a bureaucratic snafu had an ineligible player out there, but where do we draw the line?
To go to court or say it doesn't matter in this case because they did not mean to break the rule isn't the issue. The rules are there, everyone agreed to them and now they want to change them? "

swoopy99_2000 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 12:19 PM:

" So now there will be plenty of parking when Norton plays Abington at Bridgewater-Raynham High School tonight !!! "

sinbad wrote on Dec 2, 2008 11:50 AM:

" a johnson.....you are quite right. "

Attlegal wrote on Dec 2, 2008 11:43 AM:

" I'll bet the staff at Feehan is saying it was a gift from god. They should have to play someone to get to the final. How 'bout the Pats - they're a crummy team too! "

ajohnson32 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 11:22 AM:

" I'm just saying that The punishment doesn't fit the crime . All the players from both sides deserve to play this thing out. Feehan gets cheated as much as Mansfield. I'm sure they want to play Mansfield and have a chance to go the Superbowl... Not just get there by default. That would kind of put an astrick on there season. I'm sure they would rather have an astrick having beat Mansfield rather than not playing the game at all. "

curmudgeon wrote on Dec 2, 2008 11:22 AM:

" As distasteful as it may be I do think it is incumbent on the MHS administration principal, AD and Head Coach to issue a formal statement about the situation to provide clarity as to what, when and how.

Rather than to refuse to return phone call or go into a bunker mentally. "

sinbad wrote on Dec 2, 2008 11:16 AM:

" Mark Faranella...thanks for the updates. Is it known exactly how and when the information on this player came to light? Did you ask Coach Redding? I hope in the present that this can somehow be sorted out for the sake of the players. "

curmudgeon wrote on Dec 2, 2008 11:09 AM:

" A matter this serious and with great implications, gets reported by a phone call to the MIAA office. Curious why the MHS principal, AD and Head Football coach didn't make the less than 20 minute ride to MIAA's Franklin office, with all the records materials and paper work and be sitting on the doorstep at 8 a.m. on Monday to self-report and discuss the situation with the powers that be? For that matter I'm sure a phone call could have been made last Wednesday or Friday to an MIAA official? If you have not seen sports (Mr. Mark Faranella's) blog here read that for some more insights. "

hardhearted wrote on Dec 2, 2008 11:04 AM:

" to ajohnson32 -- so you say scr@w the rules it's just a game. I say at this level the rules are just as important as they are in the Superbowl.
As I said, sportsmanship is the big reason these sports are there. If we just wink and say ignore the rules then what are the kids going to learn? It's not how well you play it's what you can get away with? (excuse the grammatical transgression)
I wonder how many people saying the game should be played have bets on Mansfield winning? "

ajohnson32 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 10:51 AM:

" Rules are rules...That's why Feehan lost their coach a couple of years ago. But if you polled all the people from both sides they would say LET THEM PLAY .After all it is just a game. It's more important to the players than anyone else. "

skeptic wrote on Dec 2, 2008 10:49 AM:

" No transcript shouldn't surprise anyone. School systems are not the models of efficiency we would like to believe they are. (sarcastic grin) "

realist wrote on Dec 2, 2008 10:45 AM:

" There is nothing in the rules that allows for North Attleborough to play in Mansfield's stead. This isn't the Miss America pageant where the first runner up takes over.
Mansfield -- I'm sorry but rules are there. Whether it be player eligibility or twelve men on the field. Unintentional violations are not excuses.
North Attleborough -- better luck next year.
Feehan -- good luck, you have extra time to rest and prepare - no excuses. "

Mark M. Farinella wrote on Dec 2, 2008 10:43 AM:

" BT1957: The player in question participated in a total of seven plays in games against Sharon and OA. Your assertions are incorrect and otherwise unworthy of comment. "

hardhearted wrote on Dec 2, 2008 10:42 AM:

" It's a shame that this happened and I'm sure Feehan would rather win outright than by forfeit. But rules are rules whether the violation was intentional or not.

Isn't sportsmanship one of the reasons for organized high school sports? What does running to court show the students? If you don't like the rules that you agreed to in advance then find a lawyer. Accept the outcome with a little bit of grace and show the students that the rules are there and should be followed. "

BT1957 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 10:33 AM:

" sinbad - Good Luck. I hope this mess gets cleared up and your Grandson gets to play tonight. I agree, integrity is indeed the prize after all the hard work these young men put in. "

lindsay929 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 10:25 AM:

" Why did they let a kid into school without a transcript in the first place? Forget the football issue, how come this kid is in school without any official documentation? How do you enroll in classes without a transcript? What kind of school is that?

I doubt that the coach is privy to the kids academic file from previous schools - so why put this on the football coach and team? The AD at the school should be on top of this. The sad thing is that the administration failed and the team pays the price. I hope they let them play and sort it out later. "

sinbad wrote on Dec 2, 2008 10:05 AM:

" Redding said it was only 6 plays at the end of 2 games already won. If he is lying, then that can be proven. Also, if I was the North Attleboro team,(a team of great integrity in their own rite) I wouldn't want to "win" this way. I have a grandson on the Mansfield team, and I can tell you that the Mansfield football program has instilled integrety in him, whatever happens in this case. "

BT1957 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 9:53 AM:

" 6 plays all year? Ya right. Sorry sinbad. Redding should have known. My heart goes out to the kid's on the Mansfield team. "

mnsfld08 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 9:50 AM:

" This was clearly a mishap on MHS side if the player had been there go to player than of course all of his paper work would have been reviewed. Furthermore, I think that if he only played a few snaps what's the big deal?

You can't just give BF a good to the Super Bowl Free Card.

I wonder who brought this situation to light? If MHS knew about this before why didn't they resolve it earlier in the season. To think Redding would want this team to get so close and then see them have to forfeit its absurd. "

sinbad wrote on Dec 2, 2008 9:32 AM:

" If Mike Redding had brought in a "ringer" and knowingly used him to win a championship is one thing, but to have him only in 6 plays all year at the end of games already won is another thing. Use your head, BT. "

BT1957 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 9:22 AM:

" I agree Feehan should be playing North. That's why the Mansfields staff waited until the last minute. By now the football programs at all schools is shut down for the year. Usally the day after Thanksgiving. Unless you are going to post season play. I'm still getting a kick out of this. What was Redding thinking. "

Honor1st wrote on Dec 2, 2008 9:11 AM:

" A life lesson at the kid's expense.
The Coach, AD, and ultimately the Principal did not carry out their responsiblities. No excuses.
I expect to see the responsible parties stand up and publicly apologize to ALL of Mansfield, but, most importantly, in front of the MHS students body. "

ajohnson32 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 9:02 AM:

" At the very least Feehan should be playing North Attleboro. I'm sure North hasn't forgotten there plays in one week.They already played them this year.Feehan shouldn't get to go to the Superbowl without playing anybody. That's not fair either. "

BT1957 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 8:39 AM:

" Is that what you call class? A few winning seasons. Maybe the coaching staff should be more involved outside the lines. Redding and his staff should have come forward in August instead of waitng for a last minute pardon. Boy oh boy it's funny how things always surface. "

BT1957 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 8:33 AM:

" Shame on the coaching staff. How deep does this go, and how many years has this type or any other type of competitive edge been taking place. To bad for the kids who have worked so hard. It's been nice knowing you coach. No one likes a cheater. "

sinbad wrote on Dec 2, 2008 8:30 AM:

" Mark Faranella has it right on his blog. The MIAA should have thought this out without acting so irrationally. There isn't anyone who has more integrity than Mike Redding, and he instills that in his players. So if this did indeed warrant disqualification, Redding and his staff would handle the situation with class. But give everbody a chance to sort all this out first. This is a terrible blow to a group of young men who worked so hard and proved themselves champions. They are the ones who will take the brunt of this unfortunate situation. "

Hojo20 wrote on Dec 2, 2008 8:13 AM:

" Oh well, it's only HS football. If any of the Mansfield cheerleaders need consoling due to this forfeit, send me an e-mail. "


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
 or