34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Feehan cracks down on drinkers




ATTLEBORO - Bishop Feehan High School has taken disciplinary action against several students, including football players who were forced to sit out Wednesday's playoff game against Mansfield, following reports of underage drinking at a party in Attleboro.

Principal Bill Runey said "more than 10" students were the subject of actions under the diocesan high school's disciplinary policy which bans consumption of alcohol by students either on or off campus.

Punishment can range from detention to suspensions. Runey declined to say which penalties were applied.

Names of disciplined students were not released.

Runey said the school decided to take action after receiving a call from a parent notifying officials that several Feehan students had attended a recent party at their home while they were on vacation and that alcohol was present. In light of the seriousness of the allegations and several recent teen drinking incidents throughout the area, including one involved in the death of 17-year-old King Philip Regional High School senior Taylor Meyer of Plainville, Runey said the school was compelled to take action.

"This is not something I could turn a blind eye to," he said.

Feehan sanctions a variety of punishments for students who have been determined to violate school policy, including expulsion.

Runey said none of those involved in the reported party were expelled. The disciplinary action was handled by the school and did not involve intervention by police, he said.

The disciplined students included both athletes and non-athletes, Runey said. Although they did not play, some were members of the football team in a semifinal playoff game against Mansfield High School.

Runey said other students besides those who were disciplined may have attended the party.

He said he plans to take additional steps to counter the problem of teen drinking, possibly including qualified speakers to address the student body.

"We're going to do our best to make a positive out of a negative," he said.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » No comments posted. « Hide Comments

waysideinn wrote on Dec 31, 2008 9:08 AM:

" Look it. The MA state laws rule first "it is illegal to drink if you are under 21". Whether a school or the law enforces it, doesn't matter. The law is the law and the kids ought to be grateful they didn't get arrested and only got disciplined by the principal. Also if there were 30 Feehan students at a party whether on or off campus, I believe that event can be considered a Feehan event. "

hellokitty wrote on Dec 7, 2008 7:51 PM:

" i'll go with a previous post football players (captains) walk on water - sorry hockey players you only skate on ice. "

jimr28 wrote on Dec 7, 2008 7:25 PM:

" Maybe they didn't put enough in the offering that week. "

feehan wrote on Dec 7, 2008 10:41 AM:

" four hockey players were suspended from feehan for five games, including the two captains. How are they suspended and not the football captains who were also at the party? "

ashley wrote on Dec 6, 2008 10:45 PM:

" Jeez...I'm sure these aren't the first kids from Bishop Feehan to ever drink... Certainly not the first and certainly not the last... from any high school really. I remember while I was in high school that there were drinking parties, and it wasn't that long ago either... "

brady5682 wrote on Dec 6, 2008 6:11 PM:

" ".........So much for the historically misguided parents who send their children to Feehan so they can associate with a higher eschelon of students, away from the rif raf locals, drugs and alcohol and receive stricter discipline."

Motherinme, I'm sorry you had to send your children to KP. Regardless of the amount of money our families paid for the new school, nothing has changed. You're dam,n right, we want to be away from the rif raf locals, as you call them. Why would we want our children associating with "rif raf?" King Philip High School will NEVER change. Its students are trapped within its reputation and I can understand why this has left you so resentful of Bishop Feehan. You need not explain the reasons for sending children to Catholic school to people who have. "

jimr28 wrote on Dec 6, 2008 2:29 PM:

" "It's about time those in power at Feehan had to face some repercussions for treating the football players differently than all other students in the school."

What repercussions? It's a private school. They can do what ever they want. Get over it. "

dayrider wrote on Dec 6, 2008 11:20 AM:

" This would be a lot different if the story read, drinking party by Feehan Students leads to auto crash and multiple deaths. Would it not? Aren't we trying to prevent premature death in the younger generation? Do we set a good example? Do the parents of these students set a good example at home? Does society set a good example? Do college kids set a good example? In one big word NO!!! What do you expect from high school students when we ourselves are not setting a good example for them. They think it's a big joke to party and get drunk. High school students are faced with making decisions every day and night. One person made a bad decision and the others followed suit. They are lucky in the fact it was a sleepover, had someone drove a car home, we could be talking about the multiple funerals that we could have attended. "

educationfirst wrote on Dec 6, 2008 10:13 AM:

" If the below quote is true, I find that VERY disturbing. However, having gone to Feehan... I don't find it surprising. I wish the newspaper would look into that allegation. It's about time those in power at Feehan had to face some repercussions for treating the football players differently than all other students in the school.



and justic for all wrote on Dec 6, 2008 6:11 AM:

" Two Football Captains were at this party drinking beer and sleep over that night at the house. They were not suspended from playing in the Thanksgiving Day game and the playoff game. I understand that during the investigation they were interviewed by the principle. They told the principle they were not drinking (a lie). However, several students who were at this party told the principle theses two football players (Captains) were at the party and drinking. Why is there a double standard? I smell cover up! What happened to zero tolerance.
Bishop Feehan Football players walk on water (John 6:16-21) " "

educationfirst wrote on Dec 6, 2008 10:12 AM:

" and justic for all wrote on Dec 6, 2008 6:11 AM:

" Two Football Captains were at this party drinking beer and sleep over that night at the house. They were not suspended from playing in the Thanksgiving Day game and the playoff game. I understand that during the investigation they were interviewed by the principle. They told the principle they were not drinking (a lie). However, several students who were at this party told the principle theses two football players (Captains) were at the party and drinking. Why is there a double standard? I smell cover up! What happened to zero tolerance.
Bishop Feehan Football players walk on water (John 6:16-21) " "

hellokitty wrote on Dec 6, 2008 8:58 AM:

" this "incident" is not exclusive to public schools, catholic schools or private schools - this is the age were kids will experiment with drinking and unfortunately drugs. This has been happening since the 60s and beyond, and will continue. I dont believe anyone condones this behavior but we would be foolish to think it doesnt happen (just read the local paper). hopefully the kids that were drinking (probably most) did sleep over, sadly in taylor meyers tragic death she was allowed to leave on her own. kids think they are invincible just like a lot of us parents thought when we were kids. it might seem like we are preaching to the choir when we tell our kids about drinking and drugs but PARENTS - KEEP ON PREACHING! "

jimr28 wrote on Dec 6, 2008 8:47 AM:

" Why is this story even in the news paper? Any request for comment to the administration should have been a "No Comment". This is a private institution who should be protecting the privacy of the students who attend the school. The issue should have been handled between the school, the student and the parents period. Is this just a chance for Feehan to get word out to the parents of potential future students to show that unlike public schools we don't need a tragedy to react. Shame on the administration to make this a public situation.

To the students involved. You know that by going to Feehan you were expected to behave in a more appropriate manner, you didn't, you got caught and you have to deal with your punishment. You are lucky in a way because I see no mention of the police being brought in even though you committed a crime. You should count your blessing and learn an important life lesson here. "

themotherinme wrote on Dec 6, 2008 7:20 AM:

" Okay so it happened at Feehan. Feehan has the identical problems as North Attleboro, King Philip, Attleboro,etc. So much for the historically misguided parents who send their children to Feehan so they can associate with a higher eschelon of students, away from the rif raf locals, drugs and alcohol and receive stricter discipline. Feehan was like that in the '70s and hasn't changed. It's like all the other high schools except you get catholic education as part of the curiculum.
Oh yes, and at KP and North these kids would have been suspended from all extra curicular activities including the captains of the football team. Big game or not. "

and justic for all wrote on Dec 6, 2008 6:11 AM:

" Two Football Captains were at this party drinking beer and sleep over that night at the house. They were not suspended from playing in the Thanksgiving Day game and the playoff game. I understand that during the investigation they were interviewed by the principle. They told the principle they were not drinking (a lie). However, several students who were at this party told the principle theses two football players (Captains) were at the party and drinking. Why is there a double standard? I smell cover up! What happened to zero tolerance.
Bishop Feehan Football players walk on water (John 6:16-21) "

feehanmom wrote on Dec 5, 2008 11:23 PM:

" hellokitty- I can't answer that because my child wasn't at the party. I was just showing the rules as stated in the handbook. I would assume based on it that all involved were disciplined. "

hellokitty wrote on Dec 5, 2008 9:33 PM:

" maybe feehanmom can explain this to me. after making a few phone calls i talked to a dad who had a student at this "house party" and he said there were about 30 feehan students at this party. how come the paper says "more than 10 students?" i guess that is correct but "about 30 students" would have been more accurate. Did all involved get disciplined or just the "more than 10?" "

feehanmom wrote on Dec 5, 2008 7:29 PM:

" That should clear it up for anyone with questions. Parents and students agree to these rules prior to entering the school. "

feehanmom wrote on Dec 5, 2008 7:29 PM:

" Any student involved in the sale or distribution of alcohol or other drugs will be immediately expelled. The administration reserves the right to search any person, book bag, locker, or vehicle when the presence of alcohol or other drugs is suspected. "

feehanmom wrote on Dec 5, 2008 7:28 PM:

" Alcohol and other drugs: The use of or possession of alcohol and or other drugs by a Bishop Feehan student on/off school property or at any school event is strictly forbidden. Additionally, the conveying of information to other students about the sale and/or distribution of alcohol or drugs is strictly forbidden. This policy is extended to prescription medication. Prescribed medications must be registered with the school nurse. When a student has violated this policy but is not expelled from school, he/she must strictly adhere to the school guidelines in order to remain a member of the student body. (N.B. Bishop Feehan extends the principle of this rule to anyone knowingly in the presence of such substance and who fails to immediately remove him or herself from such presence and/or fails to report it. Additionally the school reserves the right to investigate any situation involving unacceptable substances.) Depending upon the nature of the offense, any combinat ion of the following conditions may be applied:

The student will receive detentions and be suspended from school.

Law enforcement officials could be notified.

The student must complete a professional assessment, including a sample. The results of the assessment must be provided to the school along with a report of any recommendations for follow-up counseling or rehabilitation activities.

To remain enrolled, the student must adhere to these recommendations.

For any second offense prior to graduation, the student will be forced to withdraw from school. "

feehanmom wrote on Dec 5, 2008 7:27 PM:

" The following are right from the student handbook at Feehan that is signed by students and parents.

Conduct on/off-campus: Because the people of the Attleboro community view the conduct of Bishop Feehan students as an indicator of the values that are important to our school, students should conduct themselves appropriately at all times. This responsibility is present whether students are in or out of uniform, on or off campus. The administration reserves the right to impose school sanctions for inappropriate behavior regardless of the location or times in which that behavior takes place. "

realist wrote on Dec 5, 2008 5:03 PM:

" the radio station was 1320 AM, I think it's WARL. It was the Sun Chronicle News Hour. "

hellokitty wrote on Dec 5, 2008 4:10 PM:

" when was this party? how many kids attended? and what radio station were they on!? "

Get_A_Clue wrote on Dec 5, 2008 3:24 PM:

" BT1957 - I hope the 1957 does not reflect the year you were born. If so, anyone involved in your progression toward "adulthood" should be punished. "

ripbuke242 wrote on Dec 5, 2008 3:24 PM:

" Those kids must be kicking themselves. If they went to Mansfield High, they'd have been playing for sure... "

ricknkim wrote on Dec 5, 2008 2:39 PM:

" A school HELPS to teach and mold our children into what they ultimately become, why should they not play a roll, IN PART, in punishment for misdeeds?

A student is a reflection on an educational institution's character and image - if that student does something to tarnish that image and character, why can't the school act in a limited degree to enact punishment in the form of school restrictions?

Thinking out loud "

khmass wrote on Dec 5, 2008 2:22 PM:

" While I don't condone underage drinking, and Feehan, being a private school can set it's own rules, I am bothered by the idea of any school sanctioning students for actions that take place off campus and not during school hours. There are legal penalties in place for those actions. It is up to the police and parents to do their jobs when the students aren't in school. "

wfk wrote on Dec 5, 2008 1:31 PM:

" realist wrote on Dec 5, 2008 12:42 PM:

" I think Hojo20 likes the attention of being a contrarian. "
Hojo20 wrote on Dec 5, 2008 10:54 AM:

" Another case of adults overstepping boundaries. So what, the kids were at a house party. These old bags who are suspending the kids forgot what it's like to be young. "

I think Hojo20 like being an Azz! "

ricknkim wrote on Dec 5, 2008 12:45 PM:

" BT1957 - good idea, let's get the lawyers and courts involved so that these kids can learn the art of "guilty but I can skirt the laws through litigation" technique used by fools throughout our great litigous country. Sounds much better a lesson learned than one of accountability/consequence, eh?

It is the school's policy, by attending the institution, you agree to adhere to those policies or otherwise face disciplinary action. What part of that is confusing to you? If the parents of those students don't like it, they have every right in the world to enroll their "falsely-charged, misunderstood, not my child" kid elsewhere. "

realist wrote on Dec 5, 2008 12:42 PM:

" I think Hojo20 likes the attention of being a contrarian. "

AttleboroResident wrote on Dec 5, 2008 11:14 AM:

" MIAA rules require that athletes be suspended from participating in the next scheduled event for consuming alcohol or drugs. It's in the MIAA handbook section 62.1 Additionally, the schools may require students sign an agreement acknowledging the consequences of consumption before participating. The public schools do. Not sure about Feehan. "

Hojo20 wrote on Dec 5, 2008 10:54 AM:

" Another case of adults overstepping boundaries. So what, the kids were at a house party. These old bags who are suspending the kids forgot what it's like to be young. "

Jim7777 wrote on Dec 5, 2008 10:51 AM:

" Markus, I do not know what your point is. What tuition will be lost. Who would you want them to play, BC High, Tabor Acad., maybe Milton. "

markus wrote on Dec 5, 2008 10:30 AM:

" Do you know how much Bishop Feehan stands to loose with tuition's. Also as a private paid school, why are they competing in public school sports. "

justadad wrote on Dec 5, 2008 9:39 AM:

" To be clear, I applaud Feehan for acting decisively. Thank you realist. "

BT1957 wrote on Dec 5, 2008 9:37 AM:

" The Feehan football players should have protested the suspension. Perhaps brought it to a higher level outside the written policy that everyone has been trianed to and has signed off on. Perhaps a court hearing would have been the answer. "

realist wrote on Dec 5, 2008 9:32 AM:

" to JayT - I think justadad was being sardonic.
I heard on the radio that some of the offenders were starters on the football team forced to sit out the playoff against Mansfield.
I applaud Feehan's actions. As a graduate from the 1970s, I remember too many times where drinking was overlooked even at school events, especially if the offender was a football player or cheerleader.

What does surprise me, is that there were no parents screaming the usual excuses of - (s)he was there but didn't drink, (s)he only had a sip to see what it was like, (s)he only had half a beer... You know the list.

Who knows, I might even increase my annual donation because of this. "

JayT wrote on Dec 5, 2008 8:52 AM:

" justadad, are you serious? A Witch hunt? They are minors drinking and got reported. So per school rules they were disciplined. I dont see how this could possibly be considered a witch hunt "

Jim7777 wrote on Dec 5, 2008 8:28 AM:

" Wait your telling me that someone is being held accountable for their own actions and decisions, at a High School not less. What a novel idea. "

HARRY HINDSIGHT wrote on Dec 5, 2008 7:31 AM:

" Another example of Feehan handling an issue in house and properly. Notice how there is no mention of shock and awe, just there was an issue, Runey handled the discipline and now they may get speaker in to inform the student body. Time to move on. "

justadad wrote on Dec 5, 2008 6:48 AM:

" Wow, this is just unbeleivable. These poor kids must be the subjects of a witch hunt. Is there going to be an outcry with this story? "


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
 or