News
Mansfield thrown for loss
![]() Rodney Chance,l eft, and Andrew Doherty console one another as the end of last month's Super Bowl again against Walpole nears. (File photo by Martin Gavin)
Top Headlines Other sanctions in the stinging rebuke include calling upon the school to punish head coach Mike Redding and refund legal costs incurred by the MIAA. School officials say they were caught off guard by the severity of the MIAA reprimand. The MIAA, in a letter sent to Mansfield High Principal Joseph Maruszczak, said it will "sustain the forfeit of two games" in which the school used an ineligible, fifth-year player. The forfeitures mean the team will lose its Hockomock League title and be forced to return its Super Bowl runner-up trophy. North Attleboro High School will be the new Hockomock League champion. On Tuesday, Redding said he was disappointed with the decision, saying he wanted his players to get the recognition they deserved. "They worked very hard," he said. "We didn't want to see them lose out on a technicality." The controversy began when Mansfield determined that the player in question was enrolled in his fifth calendar year of high school. According to MIAA rules, any fifth-year student wishing to play a sport must receive a waiver, which the Mansfield player never did. School officials have said they used football as a way to get the student, who had previously dropped out, to return to school. In December, after Mansfield self-reported the violation, the MIAA ruled that the team had to forfeit the two games in which the student played. The school sought - and received - a temporary restraining order against the ruling that allowed the team to continue playing. The court ordered the MIAA to convene a subcommittee to hear Mansfield's appeal before issuing a final ruling. The MIAA held an appeal hearing on Dec. 18 to allow Mansfield to present its case. Maruszczak, Redding and Athletic Director Patrick Burns attended the hearing and spoke on the school's behalf, saying the issue was "an honest oversight." According to the letter, Maruszczak must send "letters of forfeiture" to the principals of Oliver Ames High School and Sharon High School, the two schools Mansfield defeated while using the ineligible player. The entire Mansfield athletic department will be on probation for one year and officials must develop a better process to determine eligibility within 90 days, according to the letter. Maruszczak must also punish Redding, whom the MIAA said took too long in reporting the violation. If the school's penalties do not satisfy the organization, the MIAA will step in and issue its own punishment for what it calls Redding's "continued disregard for MIAA rules and policies," the letter said. Redding was disciplined by the MIAA in February after excessively arguing with officials during a playoff game in 2007. He was ordered to attend a sportsmanship compliance workshop, apologize to the game officials in writing and write an evaluation of his sideline behavior. Redding said he did not agree with the characterization and that he has worked hard to enforce the rules of the school and the MIAA throughout his 21 years of coaching. "The (previous) incident was not a rule violation, and I self-reported this violation," he said. "I'm really not sure how that is disregarding the rules." The MIAA is also ordering the school to pay the organization's legal fees incurred during the injunction proceedings, citing a rule that allows the MIAA to recoup legal fees if a school unsuccessfully sues the organization. Michael Trowbridge, chairman of the school committee, said that while he had expected the MIAA to enforce the forfeitures, he did not expect the other penalties to be levied. "Deep down I felt they would uphold (the forfeitures)," he said. "But that's all I thought the outcome was going to be." Trowbridge said school officials will sit down in the next few days to review the MIAA's ruling before deciding how to proceed. He said the school has already begun developing a plan to prevent a similar situation from developing in the future. Redding said althougth he was disappointed with the ruling, he was proud of the way the student athletes handled themselves throughout the process. "The young men on the team handled themselves with a lot of maturity," he said. "I'm very proud of the way our students handled themselves." MATT KAKLEY covers Mansfield for The Sun Chronicle. He can be reached at 508-236-0333 or at mkakley@thesunchronicle.com.
View Comments » No comments posted.
« Hide Comments
|
gridkid wrote on Jan 8, 2009 1:18 PM:
I am aware of the fact that the player was presented to the Coaching staff as eligible by the guidance dept. However, I dont believe anyone ever questioned the validity of it. There are over 100 players on the Mansfield Roster from Freshman to Seniors. The kid was NOT a transfer. He never played SPORTS period. The unfortunate thing of all this is that the coaching staff asked the wrong questions at the begining of the season. Do all my players on the roster have the credits and grades they need to play? Do you think that anyone on the staff actually would think that a senior who never played before may not be eligible because of an obscure rule that states you only have 4 years to play sports from the time you enter your freshman year? and NOT like the NCAA which states you have 4 individual years to play. Just wondering, all you coaches out there... how many of you out there are dealing with over 100 differnt players? Players that want to ba apart of a team and knowing that there is a no cut rule? What do you football coaches do with the extra 50 kids who are marginal? You try to get them all in. You try to make everyone part of the team. But in reality, what do you really think happens with 50 some odd players who are not ready for prime time? "
Sun30 wrote on Jan 8, 2009 6:39 AM:
All the coach had to do was call the player in question, ask him if this was his fifth year and ask him if he had played in any games this season. I doubt this would have taken five days. Watching the film was to add to the MHS spin that he only played seven plays in two blowout win. The rule is crystal clear to every high school in the state and I agree that it was an unfortunate oversight by the MHS administration. However, I believe they intentionally sat on this information once they found out which created the mess. For the bloggers to continually say how much the coach cared for this player who had dropped out and used football to come back to school seems disingenuos. If he cared so much, why didn' he know? "
Central MA Football Fan wrote on Jan 8, 2009 6:31 AM:
Obsrvr, though we seem to agree on most things, I believe it is the head coaches responsibility to ensure that all administrative requirements are met before the season starts. Have seen how severe the pentalties could become, I as a coach verify that all my players are eligible. Might only take me a couple hours, and obviously longer for a football team because they have many more kids than my basketball team, but the time would be worth it to avoid these issues and what they haev done to their players. "
Central MA Football Fan wrote on Jan 8, 2009 6:25 AM:
cmmsmc wrote on Jan 7, 2009 10:57 PM:
2:The coach had many years experience and should have requested a waiver which they probably would have recieved
but he didn't
3: The fifth year senior was part of the team and practiced with them all along
4: To say that the fifth year senior was inconsequential is saying that any kid on the scout team, B team ,C team or whatver doesn't matter is a slap in the face to he kids who bleed their school colors and never sees serious playing time and that is wrong
5 Redding was determined to beat Feehan in the playoff since being beat last year and that was the teams goal then hopefully winning the Superbowl
6: Nobody expected the Walpole Coach to be such a scumbag and it is the kids who will be tarnished and it is a shame for all of the kids
7: Losers: Mansfield kids, North Attleborough Kids, Bishop Feehan kids
Reading Kids whose superbowl playoff and superbowl games were !@##$ up'd by adults
8: Winners:the kids of Walpole,Mansfield.North and Feehan who will learn and grow with this. "
gridkid wrote on Jan 7, 2009 9:29 PM:
Mansfield KNEW 5 whole days in advance?
That is NOT true. Coach Redding heard a RUMOR 5 days earlier. at the rally the day BEFORE THANKSGIVING. What dont you understand about that? the faculty and entire admin LEFT THE BUILDING that afternoon. As he investigated over his Thanksgiving holiday to find out if the rumor was substantiated he EVENTUALLY found that it was needed for him to come forward to his superiors and say "hey, we MIGHT have a problem". We need to go thru HOURS AND HOURS of film to see if this kid ever got into a game. One kid out of 100. Did he play did he not play. IT took time to find out if he was eligible or not. IT took even longer to find out if he even played. OVER A HOLIDAY WEEKEND WITH NO HELP FROM THE ADMIN!!!!!!!!!!! "
Sun30 wrote on Jan 7, 2009 8:39 PM:
I am a big sports fan and I am not from NA or any other Hockomock town. The Wapole coach is a criminal low life who is headed to jail. However, I don't see the correlation. You are assuming the school knew, and if they did, lots of heads should roll. Still, before you puff up your Mansfield pride, realize that MHS and the coach knew about the infraction five days prior to letting the MIAA know. They also knew what the penalty would be(see Lawrence High this year). NA should have been allowed to play and Feehan had to deal with the uncertainty of the sleazy legal maneuvering by MHS. If Feehan had won, they would have then been at a disadvantage against Walpole with one day less rest. And maybe the Coach is a great guy and coach, but from what I have been told, there have been some questionable residency issues of star players in past years. "
071297 wrote on Jan 7, 2009 8:14 PM:
obsrvr wrote on Jan 7, 2009 5:09 PM:
Central MA Football Fan wrote on Jan 7, 2009 5:07 PM:
obsrvr wrote on Jan 7, 2009 4:55 PM:
Central MA Football Fan wrote on Jan 7, 2009 4:41 PM:
obsrvr wrote on Jan 7, 2009 4:34 PM:
Central MA Football Fan wrote on Jan 7, 2009 4:24 PM:
Common Sense Coordinator wrote on Jan 7, 2009 4:23 PM:
Central MA Football Fan wrote on Jan 7, 2009 4:21 PM:
obsrvr wrote on Jan 7, 2009 4:00 PM:
easyez wrote on Jan 7, 2009 3:27 PM:
peter q. zalover wrote on Jan 7, 2009 3:05 PM:
mmarcia wrote on Jan 7, 2009 3:00 PM:
peter q. zalover wrote on Jan 7, 2009 2:29 PM:
ricknkim wrote on Jan 7, 2009 2:26 PM:
I think winnawinnachickendinna needs to head home and kid a dog or something, talk about tossing insults left and right. "
jimr28 wrote on Jan 7, 2009 12:15 PM:
obsrvr wrote on Jan 7, 2009 11:39 AM:
winnawinnachickendinna wrote on Jan 7, 2009 11:33 AM:
realist wrote on Jan 7, 2009 11:16 AM:
dayrider wrote on Jan 7, 2009 10:49 AM:
obsrvr wrote on Jan 7, 2009 9:40 AM:
burf1 wrote on Jan 7, 2009 9:31 AM:
Sun30 wrote on Jan 7, 2009 6:13 AM: