Weather Forecast

Budget forecast bleak in North Attleboro

Town may lose 37 jobs in wake of revenue, aid cuts

Monday, March 9, 2009 2:16 AM EDT



 AddThis



NORTH ATTLEBORO - The town is looking at reducing staff levels by the equivalent of 37 full-time positions, but likely more if budget cuts have to go deeper.

A presentation Monday on the budget for the fiscal year starting July 1 painted that bleak picture.

In order to keep all employees, pay negotiated raises and retain all services, the town would need to increase its budget by $4.2 million in the 2010 fiscal year - or about 6 percent, Town Administrator Mark Fisher said.

However, with the anticipated revenue challenges and cuts to state aid, the town is not even looking at level-funding for the 2010 fiscal year budget. Fisher said the town will need to cut $1.6 million or almost 2 percent from current levels to meet revenue projections.

While it is early in the budget process and the figures are still preliminary, the town is already anticipating dealing with some tough challenges. Just to get to level funding, the town would have to layoff 26 full-time and 9 part-time employees, leave five full-time and five part-time vacancies unfilled and reduce hours for five full-time and 39 part-time positions. Those cuts amount to a reduction in staffing that is equivalent to the loss of about 37 full-time employees and stretch across both the school and town sides of government.

Even with those cuts in staffing, the town will still have to reduce its budget by another $1.5 million. In terms of staffing along, that is another 31 employees, Fisher said.

Fisher provided the budget information during a state of the town budget address to all appointed and elected board members Monday - and similar sessions with town department heads and unions earlier this month.

"The more everyone knows about the process, the better off we'll be in future discussions," he said. "We don't have an easy road ahead of us, but it is one I feel very confident we can get through."

Fisher is recommending using $900,000 from the town's stabilization fund, or rainy day savings account, to help boost revenue in the 2010 budget. While the stabilization account has $2.7 million in it currently, Fisher said it is critical to save some of that money for the 2011 budget.

"This is a rainy day," he said. "But it's the first of what we think is going to be two years of rainy days."

To help with the additional $1.5 million in cuts, the town's unions have been asked to consider a new health insurance plan that would have no increase in premiums but a substantial increase in co-pays and deductibles. Fisher said the town would pay a portion of increase in co-pays, but would save in the end because the increase in health insurance costs would drop from 10 percent to 2 or 3 percent.

Unions have also been asked to make other concessions including reducing work weeks, furloughs and freezing step pay increases.

The three unions with contracts have been asked to give up their negotiated pay raises, which would save the town about $210,481. If all employees took a one-week furlough, the town would save $285,000.

If all employees, including elected officials who receive stipends, took a 4 percent pay reduction, it would cover the entire $1.5 million. Closing town hall on Friday afternoons would also cover most of the $1.5 million, Fisher said. Fisher said the unions have been receptive to the discussions thus far, and he thought that some concessions would ultimately be approved.

 



Post Your Comments


Anna DeMarinis wrote on Feb 24, 2009 6:01 PM:

" Take the pay cut and save the jobs or cut soem people. That's how the real world operates. If government employees can't accept the same terms, then it's time to lose the government. I'm with realist, skeptic and jdr - no sympathy and find pork to cut. I know it's there. I'd be happy to volunteer to do a line item by line item examination. And if the unions won't negotiate better terms, do what Reagan did and fire all the union employees. "

jdr wrote on Feb 24, 2009 3:37 PM:

" Pay now or pay later. Use the stabilization fund to cover the shortfall... until its gone, then HOPE things are better in the future, otherwise, 2012 will be tough with little in the fund. Better yet, how about culling some pork from the town budget. I can't believe its all bare bones. Lots of screaming and yelling about Federal pork and bankrupting the nation, how about cutting some pork from the town budget. "

hawk1 wrote on Feb 24, 2009 1:59 PM:

" According to article, it appears shortfall is being looked at in a logical/commonsense approach. Usually an unemotional decision is best in my opinion. "

seriously123 wrote on Feb 24, 2009 1:23 PM:

" I agree with natownie. I think it is funny how the higher up's get to keep there jobs. How about the job that was invented for Joanne Cathcart? That was never talked about when the town was looking for an administrator. They are looking at laying off more laborers? So when the so called leaders need a job done who is gonna perform them? "

realist wrote on Feb 24, 2009 12:43 PM:

" That's the problem, they are not serving us. They are looking for ways to preserve the jobs not the services.

The money is just not there. Local-aid, Stimulus money, revenue streams -- it all comes from one place - taxpayers.

For several years those of us in the private sector have seen raises disappear, health insurance premiums and co-pays go up and lay-offs without notice. Why should those working for the town have guaranteed positions for life? "

natownie wrote on Feb 24, 2009 12:41 PM:

" Mr. Fisher is only talking about cutting the clerks and laborers! How about you taking a pay cut Mr. Fisher! Do YOU need to be making $100,000+ a year while the rest of the town employees work from paycheck to paycheck? How about some of the highly overpaid department heads? Why don't they get pay cuts? Mr. Fisher does NOT care about the employees and this is a worse case scenario! As a town employee, I know $$ can be cut in other places....Let's hope when his contract is up next year the BOS makes the RIGHT decision this time!!! "

hawk1 wrote on Feb 24, 2009 11:40 AM:

" wow. I guess misery loves company. Nice comments for people that are serving you. "

skeptic wrote on Feb 24, 2009 9:17 AM:

" The key here is "In order to keep all employees, pay negotiated raises and retain all services". If you look around, many businesses are cutting back. Have you noticed some of your neighbors aren't leaving for work in the morning and some of the regulars aren't at Dunkin' Donuts?

This is where "leadership" comes in. The elected officials will have to make some cuts. (I know - towns always cut where the public will hurt the most, teachers, cops and firemen). But maybe the town employees should realize that time are tough. Maybe we have to go back and renegotiate contracts, face pay cuts or even layoffs.

You aren't getting a lot of sympathy from Joe Taxpayer this time around. "


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 


Advertise with Us Jobs Real Estate for Sale Real Estate for Rent Place an Ad Subscribe Reprints Submit News thesunchronicle.com
Copyright © 2008 The Sun Chronicle, Attleboro-North Attleboro, MA. All rights reserved. | Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.