34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
Opinion

If only one vote had changed...




We are mightily disappointed in the votes last Wednesday by state representatives Steve D'Amico, D-Seekonk, and Louis Kafka, D-Sharon, whose district includes a Mansfield precinct, to maintain the "hack holidays" of March 17 and June 17.

The vote ended in a 78-78 tie. Had either voted Yes, this most peculiar institution of two state holidays that apply to a single county -Suffolk, comprised mainly of Boston - would have cleared the House. It would also have advanced the bill's chances in the Senate, where it was defeated 17-22, but where reconsideration has been expected.

One defender of the Republican-sponsored amendment said the savings to taxpayers would amount to $5 million. We can't vouch for the number, as the cost would require an analysis of overtime and other spending related to providing necessary coverage on state employees days' off. It could be lower, or higher, but with the current state of the economy any savings are welcome.

More importantly, a repeal of these holidays would have underscored the promises of reform echoing in the Statehouse since last Tuesday, when former Speaker Salvatore DiMasi was indicted on influence peddling charges.

State Rep. Bill Bowles, D-Attleboro, broke from Democratic ranks to vote for the repeal, as did dozens of other members of the majority party. Yes votes were also cast by Rep. Betty Poirier, R-North Attleboro, and F. Jay Barrows, R-Mansfield. Both area state senators, Scott Brown, R-Wrentham, and James Timilty, D-Walpole, voted to repeal the holidays on May 21. Of the area delegation, only D'Amico and Kafka voted to keep these holidays. Most of their constituents share our disappointment, we expect. D'Amico and Kafka won't have to face a report card from the voters until November of next year. That's a long way off, but knowing that, when faced with an opportunity for reform, your legislators cast deciding votes in favor of "business as usual" is something worth remembering.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » 8 comment(s) « Hide Comments

khmass wrote on Jun 8, 2009 7:41 PM:

" wxman, I don't disagree with you about hard economic times. But isn't it interesting that (at least) Evacuation Day survived the Great Depression? That made what we are going through now seem like a walk in the park. Again, I wonder if the press made a big deal about it then, or is it just another cause du jour such as the press just loves to create? "

vladimir1 wrote on Jun 8, 2009 4:24 PM:

" Yes they should have voted to get rid of these holidays, but they didn't. Am I "mightily disappointed?" No. These have become scoff holidays anyway. I work in Boston (suffolk County). We don't get Evacuation Day - that's the day everone has to be out of Perkins Square - and Patriots Day is a floating holiday. Employers assign the number of holidays they pay for and that's it. Take Patriots day and give up the day after Thanksgiving.
Besides, this is really targeted at union employees, especially state and city workers, and the Dems won't go against them. Negotiate harder, that's all. "

wxman wrote on Jun 8, 2009 3:42 PM:

" khmass... as economies sour, private companies tighten their purses. they have to do so to stay in business. Every go around results in a lost sick day, or a lost holiday, or some other benefit. The problem is that in these same times, state government doesn't follow the same model. The solution is to bring in more revenue (ie TAXES), rather than tighten the purse strings.

In good economic times, only a select few really make a fuss. Although we all are jealous when you see how few are on the train, or the road. You feel you also deserve the day off. But it's not really an economic issue. NOW, when we're all pinching pennies, we expect our government to do the same. And they are NOT! "

khmass wrote on Jun 8, 2009 2:05 PM:

" One thing I am curious about. From what I can determine, Evacuation Day has been a holiday since 1901. I am not sure about Bunker Hill Day. Why the sudden interest on the part of the press. You would think that there would have been annual editorials decrying these days since their inception. Could it be an element of jealousy? I am not going to jump into the debate one way or another. But it is sad how things that were once important to us later get derided.(Look how people treat RI about VJ day) "

anavoter wrote on Jun 8, 2009 12:30 PM:

" Spamalot01: My apologies, you are one of the exceptions to the rule. I agree with your comments above.

I wonder what the rationale for Steve D'Amico, D-Seekonk, and Louis Kafka, D-Sharon, voitng for the holidays is??? "

Spamalot01 wrote on Jun 6, 2009 1:44 PM:

" Thanks for the generalization, anavoter. I am generally a liberal democrat and I personally find both "holidays" to be discriminatory in origin and intent. After all, what is Evacuation Day except a day for people to be able to fully appreciate their hangovers from St. Patrick's Day? And shouldn't the events of Bunker Hill be fully incorporated into the remembrances of Patriot's Day? Even though Patriots Day has become merely an excuse to hold the Boston Marathon AND for people to take in a daytime Red Sox game, at least it is a state-wide holiday. Why is there any need for such ridiculous excuses for "local" holidays? Enough of the "featherbedding" of paid leave for a small segment of the population. If it's not available for everyone, then it shouldn't exist. "

ken wrote on Jun 6, 2009 10:39 AM:

" And you are surprised? D'Amico is a nothing legislator who needs to get a real job. I plan on helping him to get motivated by getting him removed from office. "

anavoter wrote on Jun 6, 2009 8:49 AM:

" Our legislature and government is full of patronage and hack jobs. It does not surprise me that most of the people who support these holidays are liberal democrats.

Thanks to those who voted to eliminate these holidays. "