34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Public to get first look at Olive Street bridge plans



The public will get a look at the state's plans to replace Attleboro's Olive Street bridge at a hearing on Thursday. (Staff photo by Mike George)




ATTLEBORO - Plans to replace the Olive Street Bridge are scheduled for a hearing this week, but motorists who have to take detours around the closed railroad span should not expect any relief soon.

It will be years before they once again travel over the bridge that links routes 152 and 123 by crossing the electrified MBTA commuter rail line, one city official said.

The hearing, held by the state's highway department, aims to solicit public comment on a design which has reached 25 percent completion.

The hearing is scheduled for 7 p.m. Thursday in city hall.

City Councilor Walter Thibodeau, vice chairman of the council's transportation and traffic committee, said bridge building, especially over an electrified railroad, is a long and complicated process.
"It's probably going to take a major amount of time to get it done," Thibodeau said.

A railroad bridge on lower County Street, for example, has been closed for two years and is not expected to be complete until spring of next year, according to MassHighway's Web site.

The Olive Street bridge was closed for safety reasons in March, but that hasn't hastened planning for replacement, Thibodeau said.

It's simply the bridge's turn in a long and winding que of projects to rebuild crumbling infrastructure around the state, he said.

"It's been on the list for replacement for at least 15 years," Thibodeau said.

Nonetheless, the hearing is important because this is the time to seek changes in the plans, he said.

Plans call for the bridge to be shortened from 180 feet to 160 feet. The area affected by construction will run from the Ten Mile River Bridge on the west side, to Ellis Street on the east side, a stretch of about 1,300 feet.

Cost estimates are running about $9.5 million.


 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » 11 comment(s) « Hide Comments

chiman1111 wrote on Jun 22, 2009 7:26 PM:

" Yeah like County Street Bridge. How lond do we have to wait for that to be fixed? Its been over what...5 years now?How much work have they done and what will it take to finish it? Attleboro's reputation for bridge work is harendous! From Tiffany, to Thatcher now Olive. They start a bridge then wait 10yrs and start another one and so on! Pathetic! "

ricknkim wrote on Jun 22, 2009 3:20 PM:

" I understand it cuts a couple minutes here and there off of travel time - but in the big scheme of things, is $10m worth 2 minutes convenience for several hundred residents? Not sure either way, just curious what others thought. Also, I am willing to bet there are other bridges that impact far more people that require repairs versus this one. $10m sure could do a lot for other issues today. "

realist wrote on Jun 22, 2009 2:54 PM:

" ricknkim - I was just trying to point out that folks in California didn't take forever to get the ball rolling. There is nothing unique about this site that they could not have had plans drawn up years ago.

As to not bothering to fix it - Olive Street can cut a lot of time off the trip going to La Sallette in December and for year round avoidance of the County St - Wall St area when a trainload of people is trying to escape from the parking lot. "

kevin h. wrote on Jun 22, 2009 2:29 PM:

" With tongue firmly in cheek I ask... What about a tunnel under the train tracks. Big Dig II!! "

kevin h. wrote on Jun 22, 2009 2:27 PM:

" ricknkim, That's not a bad idea. "

ricknkim wrote on Jun 22, 2009 2:17 PM:

" Or we could save $10m and simply not replace it - seems to be plenty of other alternative routes. Perhaps it is necessary due to the low bridges and difficulties posed to truck drivers/large trucks? Otherwise it is only a 1/2 mile in either direction for connections to 123, right?

As for the bay bridge - I think that was expedited due to the volume of traffic and commerce that depended upon it, not sure this bridge is needed nearly as much. . . . although Seabra has been doing a brisk business! "

hardhearted wrote on Jun 22, 2009 11:31 AM:

" Judging by the number of closed bridges in the area I would say that the jersey barrier / orange barrel lobby is much more powerful than the civil engineers' PAC. "

realist wrote on Jun 22, 2009 11:21 AM:

" earthquake -- I can't spell this morning. "

realist wrote on Jun 22, 2009 11:21 AM:

" A section of the Bay Bridge between Oakland and SF was replaced in less than six months after an earthquage. As the name indicates, that was over water. "

MMOB wrote on Jun 22, 2009 9:02 AM:

" TO....kevin h
your comments are so 'amusing'
true but amusing "

kevin h. wrote on Jun 22, 2009 7:55 AM:

" The Empire State Building was completed in a little over a year.

"Plans call for the bridge to be shortened from 180 feet to 160 feet."

You best get a running start to jump the last 20 feet. ;-) "