34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Hope for troubled park



Mayor Kevin Dumas, center, joined others in May 2007 in watching the land clearing for Commerce Way, the road meant to be the main avenue for the city's industrial park. From left: Mike Milanoski, Attleboro Redevelopment Authority executive director; Pret Stevenson, ARA chairman; Dumas; then-City Council President Barry Lacasse; John Walsh, Walsh Contracting Corp. president and Greg Walsh, assistant engineer at Walsh. Dumas says he's been in talks with a Warwick, R.I. company which is interested in buying and building in the park. (Staff file photo by Mike George)




Attleboro mayor says RI firm ready to move to Ides Hill land
ATTLEBORO - An out-of-state firm wants to move into the city's problem-plagued industrial business park, which would pump some needed cash into the project and perhaps, more importantly, some hope.

Mayor Kevin Dumas said he's been in talks with a company from Warwick, R.I., which is interested in buying and building.

Dumas said he could not disclose the name of the firm.

The news comes as the mayor and the Attleboro Redevelopment Authority wrestle over a deal that would relieve the ARA of some of its park responsibilities and put them in the hands of the city.

The unnamed company would be the first tenant in the troubled project that remains in imminent danger of being drowned in red ink, but is still somehow being pulled from the rocky landscape in the shadow of Ides Hill off County Street.
While the park's internal roads are still under development, Dumas said the company could locate on a corner lot off the nearly complete, state-funded Commerce Way, which would allow the company to build and the city to gain a toehold on pushing the park forward.

"We're ready to go with this," Dumas said. "We have somebody ready to move."

Dumas said the city plans to do more marketing if a deal can be worked out with the ARA which hoped to pass the whole project to city hall, but was rebuffed by Dumas earlier this month in ongoing talks behind closed doors.

The ARA has enough money to build all of the park's Roadway D or part of the park's Roadway A.

However, the ARA has no cash to supervise the projects. And it has no cash to pay back more than $2 million in loans and will be in default after today.

A $1 million court judgement in a land case also looms over the feeble financial status of the project.

While Dumas said the city will not assume the ARA's $3 million to $4 million debt, it will help the ARA restructure the debt and help it find ways to pay it.

Meanwhile the ARA must continue to manage parts of the project, Dumas said.

The ARA has said it can't manage without cash.


 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » 16 comment(s) « Hide Comments

common_sense wrote on Jun 30, 2009 5:02 PM:

" lets not forget the vacant buildings in the Mansfield park and Myles Standish, oh but that's right they have one less vacant building after the ARA and MM ran that business out of town, duh! "

Ishouldbemayor wrote on Jun 30, 2009 4:43 PM:

" Why did they build this park again? There is another one right up the street on county street thats pretty empty. What makes them think this one is going to fill up? "

steves wrote on Jun 30, 2009 12:40 PM:

" Forgot to add the poll link.
Please take a minute to fill it out

http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/437983 "

steves wrote on Jun 30, 2009 12:36 PM:

" They have the monies for roads,but no money for loans or supervision?
I understand that certain grants need to be used for certain things. What I don't get is how could they be given these grants without proving that they can actually make use of them.
I see it like giving a homeless person new furniture,or buying tires for a car you don't have. "

common_sense wrote on Jun 30, 2009 11:39 AM:

" "The ARA has said it can't manage without cash."

I'm still laughing about this one, they can't manage WITH cash!!!

Time for the ARA to go...and take your debt and MM with ya!!! "

khmass wrote on Jun 30, 2009 11:26 AM:

" If the City (not ARA I notice) gets a company to locate in the IBP, the money it generates should be used to work on completing the road and retiring the ARA's debt...not paying salaries. I have suggested before the first few buyers should get a discount with the understanding that their money will be used to complete the infrastructure for at least their area of the park "

ricknkim wrote on Jun 30, 2009 11:12 AM:

" I truly hope this works out for the benefit of the city, but can't believe it until I see a building there and moving trucks . . . . nice work mayor in trying to manage a very sloppy project. "

late to the party wrote on Jun 30, 2009 10:47 AM:

" skeptic - I am sure the Mayor would make sure those services are available to the first tenant (especially if he is attaching his name to it). Unlike MM, the Mayor seems to follow through with his word. "

skeptic wrote on Jun 30, 2009 10:23 AM:

" I would not locate a company there until I can be sure that basic services like a road and snow-plowing are available. "

late to the party wrote on Jun 30, 2009 10:01 AM:

" Well said, common sense. Well said! "

common_sense wrote on Jun 30, 2009 9:59 AM:

" God, they are like a broken record..we need cash for salaries, we need more cash to pay MM. Worry about paying the loans and not paying his sorry excuse, send him packing (as requested) and maybe the mayor will help the ARA. You wonder what they are more committed to, saving him or saving the park? "

jrjrg123 wrote on Jun 30, 2009 8:29 AM:

" Who in their right mind would build in a park that has so much controversy around it, never mind it may go bankrupt.Nothing like having the facade of your new building on an unfinished road lined with potholes and incomplete utilities. Yes mame the porter-john is outside near the pile of sewer pipes. "

s-plumb wrote on Jun 30, 2009 8:01 AM:

" Still discussing: http://thesunchronicle.ning.com/forum/topics/declaration-of-independence
Any anonomous info to splumb2009@yahoo.com "

s-plumb wrote on Jun 30, 2009 7:53 AM:

" Didn't Milanoski report the debt to be $4.5M on 23-Jun, the same day this report alludes to. "

kevin h. wrote on Jun 30, 2009 7:33 AM:

" I'll believe it when I see it. This whole project is an abortion. "

s-plumb wrote on Jun 30, 2009 5:21 AM:

" For those who were able to attend the council meeting on 23-Jun, please review this story for accuracy. thanks "