34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Driver, 85, has license revoked after accident




NORTH ATTLEBORO - The state Registry of Motor Vehicles has revoked the driver's license of an 85-year-old man who allegedly backed his car into a parking space, pinning an 11-year-old boy between two vehicles.

Dominick Perry, 85, of 173 Cherry Hill Road in Seekonk, was charged with driving to endanger in the accident Monday afternoon in the Macy's parking garage at Emerald Square mall, police said.

The boy, Zachary Rofino, 11, of 41 Constance Way in North Attleboro, was attempting to remove a stroller from the rear of his mother's sport utility vehicle when the car driven by Perry allegedly backed into him, police said.

The boy was pinned between the vehicles until his mother, Donna Rofino, banged on Perry's window to get him to move forward, according to a police report.

The boy was taken by local ambulance to Hasbro Children's Hospital in Providence for treatment of hip and related injuries before being released, police said. Police said Perry told them he didn't see anything when he backed up and then heard screaming, according to the report.

The Registry's action was taken after police faxed a report on the accident asking the Registry to take Perry's driver's license, and calling him an "immediate threat."

Ann Dufresne, a Registry spokeswoman, said Perry has a right of appeal but a hearing - if requested - will not be scheduled until after the motor vehicle charge against him is resolved in court.

Perry has no other incidents on his driver's history, according to the spokeswoman.

The accident was one of six serious accidents involving elderly drivers in the state over the past four weeks and occurred the same day the Registry of Motor Vehicles revoked the license of an 86-year-old Malden woman who struck and severely injured an elderly pedestrian in Melrose on Sunday.

On Tuesday, an 83-year-old Malden man was being charged in connection with a two-car accident in which the woman driver of the other vehicle was sent to Massachusetts General Hospital with life-threatening injuries. Police also are seeking to have his driver's license revoked.

Two weeks ago, the Registry revoked the driver's license of an elderly Canton woman who struck and fatally injured a 4-year-old Stoughton girl in a pedestrian walkway in Stoughton. Police cited the woman with motor vehicle homicide by negligent operation.

In an accident in Danvers on June 2, a 93-year-old man hit the gas pedal instead of the brake and drove his car into the entrance of a Wal-Mart. Six people were reported injured.

The following day in Plymouth, seven people were injured when a car driven by a 73-year-old woman jumped a curb and went into a crowd of spectators at a war memorial.

The spate of highly publicized accidents involving elderly drivers has sparked legislators to act on calls to require regular testing based on age. One bill would require drivers 85 and older to pass a road and eye test every five years to have their license renewed. Currently, Massachusetts drivers are only required to renew their licenses every five years and to take an eye test every 10 years.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » 13 comment(s) « Hide Comments

Betsy wrote on Jul 1, 2009 4:19 PM:

" "Eighty percent of crashes are related to driver inattention, and the leading source of such inattention is cell phones, according to a Virginia Tech study. More than 100 million people use cell phones, and an insurance public-opinion poll found that 81 percent of the public admits to talking on a cell phone while driving."

For expanded deatils visit http://www.starbulletin.com/editorials/20090629_cell_phone_ban_could_go_further.html "

soxnpats wrote on Jul 1, 2009 2:50 PM:

" HA! Realist - too funny. I agree with most - I think EVERYONE should be re-tested every 7 years and not just the basics. When I went for my driving test (25 years ago), I was taken down a residential road and asked to do a 3-point turn. My oldest son took his test 2 years ago and nothing has changed! Driving tests should include, among other tasks, merging onto highways and the ability to navigate a 4-way stop. We see bad driving everywhere and within all demographic groups and no one thinks THEY are the bad driver. George Carlin had a funny bit about how we, as drivers, go around thinking that "anyone who drives slower than us is an a**hole and anyone who drives faster is a maniac". So true and really, who actually goes around thinking "You know, I'm really not a good driver". Test 'em all I say - only way to be fair and equitable. "

taxed wrote on Jul 1, 2009 1:29 PM:

" Retest us all, that way nobody is being singled out and the elderly people can't complain. Different things at all different ages can effect our ability to drive, there are people of all ages who should not be able to renew their licenses. I went to get my license years ago and my mother was broad sided by an elderly woman who ran through a stop sign saying she didn't see it. As I was inside waiting for them to print my license, an elderly woman failed the vision test and the person behind the counter told her it was ok try again.
Not ever elderly driver is a hazard to the road just like not every 20 something driver is a hazard either. "

khmass wrote on Jul 1, 2009 1:01 PM:

" I agree somewhat with JoeJoe. Elderly drivers having accidents, like teen drinking, seems to be the cause de jour for the press. Not every elderly drive is a threat. However, I honestly do think drivers over 60 should be retested every couple of years. The reality is our bodies and minds do undergo changes after we hit 60 (or even younger in some cases) It isn't a negative reflection on the elderly, it is just a fact of life. According to this article, in this case, the man had a spotless driving record. Not many younger drivers, addicted to their cell phones and text messages while driving can say that. "

nnmom wrote on Jul 1, 2009 12:52 PM:

" Yes, we are hearing about elderly drivers' mistakes more than younger but we should still require them to submit to some test after a certain age. I know of a 75 year old what renewed her license online! What if she were disabled - no one would have known. Not a good thing. "

liss wrote on Jul 1, 2009 11:15 AM:

" sunfan--if a 20 or 40 year old hits someone, they DO get their license taken away. my father hit a woman who was jaywalking when he was 35 and he lost his license until he appealed to get it back. "

Realist wrote on Jul 1, 2009 11:05 AM:

" I'm curious -- does anyone know the demographics of the drivers who were caught in the recent North Attleborough crosswalk sting? You remember that one where they were sacrificing an intern... "

sunfan wrote on Jul 1, 2009 10:54 AM:

" The difference is, if a 20 or 40 year old hits somebody, it's not news. It's just an accident. But if someone over 65 years old hits somebody, headlines scream "elderly driver injures someone!"

Why don't we just mandatorily take everyone's license when they have an accident? You know why. Because usually it's just an *accident*.

Has every parent who ever backed over their own kid in their own driveway permanently lost their license to drive? No. Why not? "

kevin h. wrote on Jul 1, 2009 10:36 AM:

" To not single out old drivers and to be fair, EVERYONE should be tested every 60 years. "

Realist wrote on Jul 1, 2009 10:36 AM:

" Judging by my morning commute I think EVERY driver should be given a refresher course and test every five years. And you in the blue Hyundai rushing to get into DD's this morning. Do they even test RI drivers? "

mmarcia wrote on Jul 1, 2009 9:39 AM:

" Some of us are tired of the elder driver stories, others are sick of the drinking teenagers. stories. These are reflections on our society, and it is important that we are aware of them "

my4 wrote on Jul 1, 2009 8:21 AM:

" Mandatory testing for older drivers is essential, start it young, at 65 or so. No one is picking on older drivers. Stats speak for themselves. We are in a window currently where there is an accident headlining elderly drivers on a daily basis. But, the blotter goes deeper than this. For Goodness sake, if my older relatives were to drive and hit or kill someone in their sunset years, then end up with manslaughter charges in their 80s...what a devastating way to go down. If we have a legislature that can pass a sales tax hike to 6.25, I would hope they can pass something as simple as an elderly driving law to protect us all. @@ "

JoeJoe wrote on Jul 1, 2009 8:08 AM:

" I am getting a little upset with the constant trashing of older drivers.

How many other accidents were there in the general area that did not invlove older drivers? How many of those accidents involved personal injury?

It seems to me that the newspaper is possible making an issue where there is none. Are you trying to cash in on the headlines? "