34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
Columns

KIRBY: Who needs newspapers? All of us do




Like many industries, the newspaper business has struggled recently. It's gotten to the point where some have wondered if newspapers are still necessary.

Today, a collection of thoughts on the importance of newspapers, from some folks who are a whole lot more articulate than this typist:

"When someone tells me they get their news from the Internet, I want to say: 'Oh yeah? So, tell me again, how many reporters does Yahoo have at City Hall? How many correspondents from Google are risking their lives in Iraq?' "

- David Zeeck, executive editor, The News Tribune, Tacoma, Wash.: "The difference between blogging and reporting is like the difference between songwriting and karaoke. ... The blogosphere is a symphony - a cacophony - of tunes. But you need someone to write the original notes. That is what reporters do."

- Journalist Chuck Raasch, USA Today: "As a conservative who believes in limited government, I believe the only check on government in real time is the freedom of the press." - U.S. Rep. Michael Pence, R-Ind.: "Each one of you who forsakes your role in keeping our democracy alive by either inaction or, perhaps worse, by action based on ignorance, threatens all the rest of us. So, read a newspaper and build a community."

- Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr., publisher, New York Times: "The founders never held the view that if rich guys can't make money off journalism, then we just won't have journalism. The nation was built on the idea that we have to put in place policies that guarantee journalism no matter what."

- Robert W. McChesney, professor of communications, University of Illinois: "A democracy is not a democracy without an informed electorate."

- Walter Cronkite, former anchor, CBS News: "The press should not be regarded only as a check on inefficient or dishonest government. It is important that it also be viewed as a powerful vehicle for the effective functioning that by definition is democratic in nature."

- James Oakes, U.S. appellate judge: "We journalists don't have to step on roaches. All we have to do is turn on the kitchen light and watch the critters scurry."

- Writer P. J. O'Rourke: "For all its flaws, the ancient art of print journalism still drives our democracy. At its best, it provides information and insight, and knits the community together. It even makes us better people - a recent study found that newspaper readers are more likely to vote, volunteer and make charitable donations. (We're also smart, talented and good-looking)."

MIKE KIRBY is editor of The Sun Chronicle. His commentaries appear in this space each Sunday. He can be reached at 508-236-0344 or at mkirby@thesunchronicle.com.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » 11 comment(s) « Hide Comments

celt wrote on Jun 22, 2009 9:17 AM:

" Ken, my point was "there is bias in every media." If you shut down all of the newspapers you do not eliminate bias form the media. TV stations, radio, blogs, even you posting and mine all have some bias. The key is to educate yourself on both sides of the issue and make an informed decision. You don't really think newspapers are biased while TV news is not, do you? "

ken wrote on Jun 20, 2009 8:59 AM:

" Celt's argument does not hold up. This article references newspapers going out of business. Fox news is a cable TV station, which has nothing to do with this story. How many newspapers can you read or find that offer a balanced view! The point here is that if people are not reading the newspapers, maybe, it is because that newpaper is no longer credible because of their propagandist views. Give people the facts and they can make up their own minds. Instead we have the countries largest newspapers spewing propaganda, not journism. They will go out business at their on hand. "

1333 wrote on Jun 16, 2009 12:08 PM:

" I love my Sun Chronicle! I love the local news they are so good at covering. Having said that, I stopped delivery because I was sick of the biased national reporting. I think it was when Sandy Berger stuffed secret documents in his clothes. There was a small blurb in the back of the SC about it. Can you imagine if Condie Rice did that? The only paper that is making money is the WSJ. Please don't fool yourself into thinking your decline is due to the internet. It's the bias news reporting. C'mon, don't you owe your readers both sides of a story?
Thank you! "

celt wrote on Jun 15, 2009 5:51 PM:

" I can't imagine starting the day without reading a newspaper. Yes, there is bias in every media, but I would not say that (for example) Fox News is less biased than the NY Times. To think of people getting all of their information only from sources they agree with is disturbing. If newspapers disappear (yes, even those with a different political slant), I think that would be a terrible loss. "

Anna D wrote on Jun 14, 2009 11:59 AM:

" As I read more about this guy at various right and left sources, I see him as an equal opportunity hater. He is a racist and he hates Jews and he hates Bush as much as he hates Obama. For the press to paint him as a right-winger was clearly biased and agenda-driven. There is nothing right-wing (or left-wing, for that matter) about this lunatic. I wish the mainstream press had reported about him and not editorialized (or maybe it was just the press's wishful thinking) but instead, they showed themselves to be not reporters but propagandists. "

Anna D wrote on Jun 14, 2009 10:49 AM:

" Just to be assured that what I wrote is accurate, I double-checked his registration status and I cannot validate it just yet, but his targets, according to police reports, included the local Fox News station and the Weekly Standard, a conservative magazine. In my opinion, this clearly does not make him a right-winger, but more a left-winger. "

Anna D wrote on Jun 14, 2009 10:40 AM:

" Sorry; I meant the 2004 Bush win, not 2000. "

Anna D wrote on Jun 14, 2009 10:37 AM:

" Another point; the man who shot and killed a guard at the Holocaust Museum the other day has been repeatedly characterized by the left wing media as a far right white supremacist. Nowhere do they say that he is a registered Democrat. Nowhere does it say that his writings, found by the police reflect a hatred for Jews and conservative Republicans, the kind of hatred that is regularly spewed in the far left blog posts like Kos and Huffington. This is not reporting. "

Anna D wrote on Jun 14, 2009 10:33 AM:

" Another example is the newspaper headlines after Bush's 51% win in 2000, Bush Wins, Country Divided. Of Obama's 52% win in 2008, the headlines screamed Obama Wins, Country United. There is no statistical or any other difference between 51% and 52%, unless you are a biased, leftist newspaper. "

Anna D wrote on Jun 14, 2009 10:31 AM:

" Mark Twain wrote: If you don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed. If you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed." He was right.
The election of 2008 proved that the media, including the printed press, are biased to the left and they did everything they could to elect Obama. This was born out in surveys of Obama voters carried out by Zogby and the Wilson Research Group. For example, most Obama supporters thought Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from her house. It was Tina Fey who said that in her Palin impersonation. What Palin said was that you could see Russia from one of the Alaskan islands, which is absolutely true. In fact, you can walk from Russia to Alaska across the Bering Strait, as was done by the so-called Native Americans thousands of years ago. I will be most happy to see left-wing newspapers crash and burn. Maybe a real newspaper will be born from the ashes. Newspapers today are generally untrustworthy. "

ken wrote on Jun 14, 2009 10:07 AM:

" The problem with most newspapers that are on the verge of going out of business is that there is NO journlism! NY Times, Boston Globe, LA Times, etc. There is not shred of journalism, only lefist agenda propaganda, or only the news they want you to read. As an example, we have hardly heard anything from the leftist media about Private Long murdered by a Muslim militant in Arkansas. Yet we have heard the news about the abortionist doctor who was murdered. Is that because of the ideals of the media? A media outlet needs to offer all stories and opinions in order to be remain viable. If they can't then they ought to go out of business. "