34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Interim senator proposal splits lawmakers




GOP lawmakers, some Democrats don't want governor to make appointment
A proposal to allow the governor to make an interim appointment to fill the late Edward Kennedy's Senate seat has divided Statehouse Democrats.

At a hearing Wednesday on the bill to change the succession process, the Joint Committee on Elections heard from hundreds of politicians, activists and voters, with Republicans against the change and the Democrats split.

Under the proposed change, a special election still would be held in about five months to fill Senate vacancies.

The change would come in allowing the governor to make an interim appointment to fill the seat until the special election is held.

Before he died, Kennedy wrote to Gov. Deval Patrick asking for the change, saying Massachusetts and the Senate needed full representation. U.S. Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., spoke in favor of the change.

"Big decisions are being made now - not in five months. And important votes are coming now - not in five months. Massachusetts cannot, and should not, be underrepresented," he said.

"It comes down to a simple question: At this historic moment, do you believe that Massachusetts should have two votes in the United States Senate, or just one?"

But, some Democrats and Republicans questioned the timing and the motivation.

State Sen. Scott Brown, R-Wrentham, who is expected to enter the Senate race, said Democrats want to make the change so they can get a political advantage.

A member of the elections committee, he said the interim appointee could throw his backing behind a candidate to sway the election.

Brown said he sees no problem with having an empty seat for a few months. Vacancies happen in the state Legislature and other lawmakers "step it up, and work to get everyone through it."

He said he does not agree with the contention that the seat has to be filled immediately to help pass health care reform because the reforms would be bad for Massachusetts.

About 94 percent of Massachusetts residents already have health care, he said.

"Why put our health care industry in jeopardy to lose jobs and our health insurance industry in jeopardy to lose jobs?" he said. He said Democrats changed the law when there was a Republican governor and now want to change it again in favor of a Democratic governor.

But, some supporters of the change are questioning the change of heart by Republicans.

John Walsh, chairman of the Democratic Party, noted that Brown and other Republican were co-sponsors of a bill filed by then state Rep. John Lepper, R-Attleboro, that would have created the interim appointment.

JIM HAND covers politics for The Sun Chronicle. He can be reached at 508-236-0399 or at jhand@thesunchronicle.com.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » 6 comment(s) « Hide Comments

jeepXJ wrote on Sep 10, 2009 11:08 AM:

" I agree, we can't keep changing the rules!! They were changed a few years ago and you're going to have to deal with them as they are now. It's shameful to see these hacks trying to change the rules again. The fact that teddy voted to change it a few years ago and then changed his mind right before he died speaks to his character. We're better off with a vacancy!! None of these hacks really represent 'US,' they just kiss up to groups that will get them votes to get into office and then push their own personal agenda, no matter what the constituents that they allegedly represent want/need. Shame. "

kevin h. wrote on Sep 10, 2009 10:21 AM:

" Ken Adie of Rockland for Senate. "

anavoter wrote on Sep 10, 2009 9:34 AM:

" I agree with the comments below. The only way to take "politics" ( Democrat or Republican) out of this is to let the people vote on who will replace Senator Kennedy. There is NO pressing need to rush in and make a political appointment. Senator Kennedy for all practical purposes was not on the senate floor and did not vote for much of the last year. It is not uncommon for Senators and Congressman to be out for extended periods of time. The state of Massachusettts has two senators and numerous congressmen who can more than adequately represent us. Lets take out the appearances of political corruption and let the people vote on all future vacancies that may occur regardless of party.
The voters of Massachusetts would be better served if we had more balanced representation in Boston. "

realist wrote on Sep 10, 2009 9:09 AM:

" Do you get it? -- while I completely agree with your sentiment I have to be the cynic and ask if you really think the folks on Beacon Hill care about our opinions. Collectively we say that none of the people in the state legislature should be re-elected, yet individually we keep voting them back in because the lawmakers come to scout meetings with proclamations or someone from your rep's office calls the state pension board on a problem your uncle had.
One Republican rep asked the question at the hearing, "If Kerry Healey were governor, would we even be here?"
This will go through, Patrick will make some hack who promises not to run an interim senator. That hack will decide it's best for Massachusetts to continue in the office and he or she will probably be elected.
As I said, I'm a bit of a cynic today. "

kevin h. wrote on Sep 10, 2009 7:58 AM:

" Perfectly said, Do you get it. "

Do you get it? wrote on Sep 10, 2009 7:36 AM:

" The thought of changing the rules again because one party now has the Gov's seat is why our current form of Gov does not work. If you are going to change the rule it should be done after the Senate seat has been filled. That would put it back on an even playing field. When it was a republican Gov voted in by the majority, the house changed the rule because they could, it was wrong then and it's wrong now. If your team is behind you can not change the rules in the middle of the game, unless youre a lawmaker in Boston????
Not voicing your opinion to our lawmakers on this change is an acceptance of this type of sleazy politics! "