34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Mansfield mom's bill moves on ahead



Denise Anderson holds her hand over her heart during Mansfield’s Memorial Day ceremony Monday at the Keach Memorial. Her son Corey Shea was killed in action last year. (File photo by Mike George)




SUN CHRONICLE STAFF

MANSFIELD - A bill that would allow a Mansfield woman to be buried in a veterans cemetery next to her son, who was killed serving in Iraq, has been green-lighted by a congressional subcommittee.

The Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs Subcommittee of the House Veterans Affairs Committee voted unanimously Wednesday to support "The Corey Shea Act," a bill sponsored by U.S. Rep. Barney Frank on behalf of Shea's mother, Denise Anderson, of Mansfield.

The bill, introduced by Frank earlier this year, would allow parents of veterans to be buried with their loved ones in military cemeteries, provided the veteran did not have a spouse or children.

Shea, 21, an Army specialist, was killed in the line of duty last year in Mosul, Iraq, when an Iraqi soldier turned his weapon on his American partners, killing two and wounding six. The current law only allows spouses or minor children of deceased veterans to be buried in the same plot as their loved ones in national military cemeteries, unless special permission is granted by the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Anderson had asked the department for special permission, but her request was denied.

Shea left behind no surviving spouse or minor children.

The bill, as passed by the subcommittee Wednesday, grants parents of deceased veterans the right to be buried with their children if the veteran has no living spouse or minor children.

The legislation stipulates, however, that the concession will not cause any veteran to be displaced and covers only veterans who died in battle or in preparation for battle. It includes either biological or adoptive parents.

U.S. Rep. John Hall, chairman of the Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs Subcommittee, moved the legislation forward quickly, holding a hearing on October 8, and putting the bill to a vote on Wednesday.

The legislation passed the subcommittee by a unanimous vote.

"I will work with leadership to help bring this bill to a vote on the House floor," Frank said. "This legislation is a testament to the devotion of Mrs. Anderson, whose personal commitment will help veterans' families across the country."

Earlier this month, Anderson traveled to Washington, D.C., to testify in favor of the bill before the subcommittee.

The legislation will next come before the full Veterans Committee for a vote and, if the bill passes that hurdle, will move to the House floor.


 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » 11 comment(s) « Hide Comments

gimmesum wrote on Oct 23, 2009 4:53 PM:

" I don't fault the woman. I fault whomever is behind using this despairing mother to score political points. "

radar57 wrote on Oct 23, 2009 4:18 PM:

" What do you expect from Barny Frank he never served in the Armed Forces. I feel for this mother but she should have placed him in a private burial setting then she could be placed near him at her time. This attempt will open up Pandora Box effect Im afraid. Sorry to say but the rules are the rules and Im sure she knew this.qD625 "

jose21 wrote on Oct 23, 2009 3:27 PM:

" I don't know that she thinks she's above the law, or that you can point fingers at a mother who wants to be burried next to her fallen son. I personally don't agree that she should be allowed, but you can't fault this woman for trying. The vetrans committee will vote and will shoot this down. I can only imagine how many soldiers are burried in this cemetery whos mothers would have gone to the grave the next day if they could have been burried alongside thier child.. "

Hojo20 wrote on Oct 23, 2009 2:53 PM:

" I don't like some laws either, but I realize i have to abide by them. Ms. Anderson thinks she's above the law. If she wants to be buried with her son, she should pay for his body to be moved to a local cemetary. I understand she is hurting from the loss of her son, but we can't open Pandora's Box and start changing laws like this. "

common_sense wrote on Oct 23, 2009 1:31 PM:

" I'm not a vet, but I have past family members we were. I was always under the impression a spouse could be buried in a vets cemetary...however it would not be next to their late spouse since they just simply fill rows and sections and do not reserve spots for their spouses. I could be wrong, just my past impression.
I feel for her loss, I do not agree with it and Frank is a clown, well we already know that. Is she also looking to buried with full military honors, I certainly hope not. "

Lester Burnham wrote on Oct 23, 2009 12:24 PM:

" Ms Raj,
I am aware of that. However, it's not very common. Go there and tell me how you feel after you have visited.
Lester "

gimmesum wrote on Oct 23, 2009 11:56 AM:

" As I posted when I first learned of this legislation earlier this month, Mrs Anderson seems to be in desperate need of professional grief counciling. I also think it would be better to offer her the option of having her son moved to another cemetery and leave the law as is.

If this law passes and Mrs Anderson still cannot cope and thinks she would be happier beside her son, what then?
I shudder to think. "

realist wrote on Oct 23, 2009 11:31 AM:

" I know it sounds cold and I can't imagine her emotional distress, but if Mrs Anderson wanted to be buried with her son then she should have purchased a civilian plot.
I see this leading to adults wanting to be buried with their mothers or fathers who were veterans. Where does one draw the line? "

Ms Raj wrote on Oct 23, 2009 9:04 AM:

" Lester - Perhaps you did not read that the current law allows a spouse or minor child to be buried with the veteran. He had neither. Are you saying that a bereaved parent of a veteran who gave his life for his country, has less rights than a spouse or minor child? If only veterans were currently allowed to be buried in national cemeteries, then I might agree with you, but that is not the case. "

Lester Burnham wrote on Oct 23, 2009 8:07 AM:

" No offense Ms. Anderson but you have no place being buried in the veterans cemetery. I am a veteran and so was my father, he is buried in the National Cemetary in Bourne, he earned the Silver Star and a Purple Heart in WW II. But he is one of many thousands in Bourne and when you walk there you feel a sense of reverence and respect. How can you go there and say to all there the rules should be rewritten for you? What makes you so special? "

kevin h. wrote on Oct 23, 2009 7:25 AM:

" Who Pays? "