Town, Krafts in showdown
BY FRANK MORTIMER SUN CHRONICLE STAFF
Thursday, October 29, 2009 2:19 AM EDT
Gillette Stadium in Foxboro.
FOXBORO - Selectmen are locked in a battle with the Kraft Group over the number of police details needed to safely run a major stadium event.
They say they strongly back the police chief's demands for more officers to better control crowd behavior and reduce the chances of alcohol-related injuries or fatalities.
But the town is also investigating stadium security chief Mark Briggs' complaints about the behavior of some local police officers working details at Gillette Stadium.
Some of the stadium's complaints about officers' performance while on detail have resulted in discipline from management, while others matters have been referred to town labor counsel Leo Peloquin, and an unnamed "third party," for investigation, Police Chief Edward O'Leary said.
Selectmen are firing off a hard-hitting, 10-page response to two recent letters in which Briggs refuses to pay for more than a stated number of police details, sets forth a litany of misconduct complaints about officers and claims O'Leary has ignored the stadium's misconduct reports.
"Chief O'Leary and the board take such matters very seriously and will not tolerate misconduct," selectmen wrote to Briggs. "You will be notified when the investigations are concluded."
Briggs charges, among other allegations, that a police officer verbally abused and physically intimidated a Kraft Group vice president, that a motorcycle officer deliberately revved his motor and spooked a state police horse and that officers have gotten into "altercations" with members of other police agencies, with patrons and with Kraft employees.
"The attitude being expressed by inattention to these matters is only making certain officers more brazen in their disregard of public safety and the cooperation that facilitates public safety," Briggs wrote to selectmen on Oct. 13.
O'Leary says relatively minor complaints have been dealt with inside the department, and "appropriate discipline for each infraction has been applied."
Asked if any officer was suspended or fired, O'Leary said the "more serious" issues remain under investigation through labor counsel.
Briggs also asserted that assigning more detail officers does not necessarily translate to better security. He said a mass response of police has, at times, been known to inflame rather than quell a disturbance.
He wrote that the number of details the town has required has grown year after year, from an average of 119 local police per game in 2002, to 163 last year to a proposed 186 officers this year.
Selectman Lorraine Brue said Briggs' numbers are faulty and misleading and that the 186 figure was mentioned at one point but never imposed on the stadium.
Briggs wrote that the stadium will pay for no more than an average of 126 officers.
In its written response, the board of selectmen says the Kraft Group is willing to accept a higher level of risk to patrons and officers than the town or the police department.
Selectmen also reminded Briggs in their response that the National Football League has directed stadiums to increase security.
Board members rejected the sweeping claim that O'Leary has remained aloof from problems with some of his assigned detail officers, and said O'Leary has met with the stadium leaders 30 times in recent months.
Much of the board's reply to Briggs, which is expected to be mailed to the stadium today, deals with the legal basis for the town's view that O'Leary, and not the Kraft Group or even selectmen, has the final say on how many police officers are needed to safely staff an event.
O'Leary said Wednesday the number of additional detail officers he is requiring this year is "minimal," and those increases are driven by the threat of terrorism, the NFL's directive to stadiums to beef up security and the priority the town gives to preventing both underage drinking and other alcohol related problems.
More than 300 people - many of them underage and intoxicated -were arrested last August at the New England Country Music Festival at Gillette Stadium.
The dispute caps months of closed-door sessions devoted to stadium security issues.
In addition to addressing police detail numbers and officer conduct, the board notified Briggs that it "will not tolerate" the withholding of detail payments to the town.
View Comments » 19 comment(s)
« Hide Comments
missy wrote on Oct 29, 2009 7:35 PM:
missy wrote on Oct 29, 2009 7:33 PM:
arniesacnusson wrote on Oct 29, 2009 7:00 PM:
Mark Briggs hates the local Police because he cannot control them. That man's conduct as the head of security is disgraceful and has on at least one occasion resulted in his being charged with a crime (A&B).
The Police are going to have altercation with people at the stadium, that is why they are there.
The Krafts have slowly let what was once the talk of the league and a family friendly envrironment, turn into almost what is was in the bad old days: A drunkfest with all sorts of non family things taking place.
Yes, I am a cop and no I do not work the stadium details. "
rabblerouser wrote on Oct 29, 2009 4:33 PM:
The town has a vested interest to have their officers perform the detail as they skim some of the money off the top for the administrative fee (ie: billing).
Follow the money trail and you will always find your answer.
Its just a shame that the public who they are being paid "To Serve and Protect" are in the middle and take the wrath from both police forces. Such is life in this dysfunctional "United States of America". "
gimmesum wrote on Oct 29, 2009 2:31 PM:
I have been in all kinds of situations when traffic is allowed to back up as patrons/customers are being ushered in and out of private business, churches, schools etc. I am not so sure it is fair to blame the officer's. "
steves wrote on Oct 29, 2009 2:09 PM:
gimmesum wrote on Oct 29, 2009 1:40 PM:
I see it all the time where officers are sitting on the sidelines because the traffic disruption really is not part of their assigned duty. "
1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 29, 2009 1:37 PM:
This has to be ticking Krafty off a bit. "
steves wrote on Oct 29, 2009 12:54 PM:
Trust me this was not a one time sighting, pay attention to any of these details anywhere!
Maybe 1 cop without his cellphone would be more interested in the traffic. "
gimmesum wrote on Oct 29, 2009 12:39 PM:
Did you happen to read the other article regarding the future of Foxboro?
Headline: FOXBORO 890,OOO IN RED
Less revenue fuels current,
future financial woes
Maybe the footbridge will be the next "bridge to nowhere".
I am not familiar with the other projects you mentioned. But I have noticed some sidewalk projects that make absolutely no sense to me. "
drag strip resident wrote on Oct 29, 2009 10:48 AM:
drag strip resident wrote on Oct 29, 2009 10:43 AM:
How to solve almost all of the problems - eliminate alcohol and give breathalyzers to those who are suspected of being unable to control/conduct themselves properly and deny entry. I know there is big money in alcohol sales, but there are lives in danger at every event and lives are PRICELESS. Eliminate alcohol and you need less police, the attitudes of the police will be what most of the clueless general public want them to be (cont) "
bingo wrote on Oct 29, 2009 10:10 AM:
As a taxpayer - and a civil human being, I find the endless turf war between the Foxboro local police and the State Police intolerable.
As for Police details at the stadium - they need more - both local and state. "
jose21 wrote on Oct 29, 2009 10:07 AM:
How about all the construction on RT 140 and 495 near Comcast, or the road work that was done on Rt 1 near the Emerald Sq Mall? Those are OK? If 9 mil was spend to fix up a walk way near a mall, nobody would say a word. But because Kraft is the billionaire owner of a sports team, he's expected to just hand tax payers money?
Try moving to Dallas where they have a billionaire owner that spent 1.5 Billion, mostly of tax payer dollars to build a stadium that the majority of the people in the area will never be able to enter because they can't afford a ticket. Do you know what percentage of Gillette publicly financed? It starts with a Z and ends with an ERO.... "
Hojo20 wrote on Oct 29, 2009 8:25 AM:
gimmesum wrote on Oct 29, 2009 7:21 AM:
sparky wrote on Oct 29, 2009 6:47 AM:
rotor109 wrote on Oct 29, 2009 6:29 AM:
arniesacnusson wrote on Oct 29, 2009 6:20 AM: