Frank helps put a halt to 'abusive' credit hikes
BY JIM HAND SUN CHRONICLE STAFF
Thursday, November 5, 2009 11:01 AM EST
Protection from "abusive" credit card interest rate increases will go into effect Dec. 1, earlier than originally planned, under a bill passed by the House Wednesday at the urging of U.S. Rep. Barney Frank.
Frank, a Newton Democrat whose district includes Norton, Norfolk, Foxboro and Mansfield, said the earlier start-up date was needed because credit card companies are racing to impose what he called "abusive" retroactive increases on good customers to beat the original Feb. 22 effective date of a cardholder Bill of Rights.
A study by the Pew Charitable Trust found companies were increasing rates an average of 20 percent.
Several members of Congress spoke on the issue Wednesday, saying they have been contacted by constituents who say they were given exorbitant increases.
The original bill prevents companies from raising rates retroactively on existing balances if the consumer has been making payments on time. It also mandates a 45-day notice on regular rate increases.
Frank called the retroactive rate increases on good customers outrageous.
"It's the single unfairest financial transaction I can think of that doesn't involve a pistol," he said during floor debate.
Frank mocked claims by credit card companies that their computers could not be ready for the bill by Dec. 1.
He said the companies apparently have "great" computer software for raising interest rates, but the software goes "berserk" when it comes to holding rates steady.
The congressman said many Republicans have joined Democrats in supporting the bill, but the GOP leadership has sided with the credit card companies instead of consumers.
Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, opposed the bill, saying it will make credit more expensive and less available.
He also said senior citizens will have trouble getting credit just as they need it most to pay for the "trillion dollar government takeover of health care."
Banks and other credit card companies fought the bill.
Scott Talbott, a vice president with the Financial Services Roundtable, told the Associated Press the companies he represents are "struggling in a tough economy and trying to provide credit for consumers."
The reasons rates are going up or credit lines are decreasing are based on two factors: a change in behavior, including a missed or late payment or exceeding credit limits, and the economic times.
"We're in a recession, so the general risk of nonpayment has increased across the board, so credit card companies are adjusting to that risk by increasing interest rates or decreasing credit lines, even if the customer has a perfect history," Talbott said. "A very small percentage may see an increase in their interest rate or a decrease in their line of credit."
The bill passed 331-92. U.S. Rep. James McGovern, D-Worcester, voted with the majority.
View Comments » 13 comment(s)
« Hide Comments
AttleboroResident wrote on Nov 5, 2009 1:42 PM:
People on this board like to shrug off sales tax and meal tax increases as optional; if you dont want to pay the tax, dont eat out. Same goes for credit fees. Dont like the company, then switch or stop using credit. Although access to credit will be drying up as the companies look limit exposure. The law Frank supported was not thought out very well and this quite simply is the expected outcome. "
Southern View wrote on Nov 5, 2009 1:34 PM:
Too bad someone hasn't proposed a law to protect honest, hard working, citizens from the liberal pols who are selling our country down the tubes. "
sunfan wrote on Nov 5, 2009 12:04 PM:
Greedy corporations continue to try to squeeze consumers. Go into any department store: Macy's, Kohl's, Penney's, Sears, whatever, and find yourself continually badgered to open a credit account. Why are stores allowed to constantly harass people like this? Only a fool would open a credit account now. Hint: the companies aren't offering you credit out of the goodness of their tiny, hard little hearts. They know a fool and his money are soon parted. Just say NO. "
s-plumb wrote on Nov 5, 2009 11:29 AM:
We're in a financial mess. We can either just take our lumps in the free market, or attempt to avoid the inevitable; ala mortgage bust. "
realist wrote on Nov 5, 2009 11:09 AM:
kevin h. wrote on Nov 5, 2009 10:24 AM:
hardhearted wrote on Nov 5, 2009 9:30 AM:
kojismom wrote on Nov 5, 2009 8:42 AM:
So let me understand this. Even though I pay on time, pay more than I have to, my rate went up and the limit went down. This is because I might have trouble paying in the future? Yes, if it goes up high enough, I probably will have trouble paying it eventually. "
anavoter wrote on Nov 5, 2009 8:41 AM:
Now these disengenuous congress people are trying to close the barn door after the horse is long gone.
I won't be long before they are loosening the lending practices again to meet the needs of their special interest groups.
Meanwhile all of them took campaign money from the same banks and institutions they are trying to reguolate. Disengenuous at best. "
themotherinme wrote on Nov 5, 2009 8:28 AM:
realist wrote on Nov 5, 2009 8:27 AM:
Unohour wrote on Nov 5, 2009 6:38 AM:
Sorry I couldn't resist. I should have posted on the stadium story.
Gravy, gravy, gravy, gravy... "
nannystate wrote on Nov 5, 2009 3:08 AM: