34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
Columns

HAND: Leading the way on health




The U.S. Census Bureau has found that Massachusetts has the lowest rate of residents without health care in the country at 4.1 percent, while Texas has the highest at 24.1 percent.

The Third Congressional District, which includes the Attleboro area along with Worcester and Fall River, is No. 1 among congressional districts at 3.4 percent.

In Texas, the Houston area is the worst at 40 percent uninsured.

In general, Northeastern and some Midwestern states are doing well providing their residents with health care coverage while southern and western states are lagging behind.

For instance, Connecticut and Vermont have 9 percent uninsured, while Nevada has 21 percent and Mississippi is at 17.9 percent uninsured. That means members of Congress who are fighting hardest to kill health care reform come from states and districts that need it the most.

Both senators from Texas have been outspoken in their opposition to the government spreading health care to the uninsured, even though 5.7 million of their residents lack coverage.

In Alaska, former Gov. Sara Palin helped make universal health care more difficult to obtain by spreading the outrageously false rumor that reform would mean "death panels" that decide whether children with Down syndrome live or die, even though 20 percent of her neighbors go without coverage.

Both Democratic senators from Arkansas have weak knees over health care reform, despite polls showing their residents favor it and 18 percent of them lack coverage.

Alabama really only has one insurance company and 14 percent of residents have no insurance, but its politicians have shown more loyalty to the insurance lobby than the people.

The census figures also raise the question of why politicians from Massachusetts would support health care reform if so many of their constituents already have coverage.

U.S. Rep. James McGovern, D-Worcester, represents the district with the highest rate of coverage, but he said coverage is only half the battle.

Another prime goal of reform is to hold down costs.

He said the cost of health care is escalating at a rate that is unsustainable. Everywhere he visits in the district, selectmen and mayors complain about large annual increases in the price of providing coverage.

Employers, families and governments cannot afford the increases, he said. And why is Massachusetts so advanced when it comes to providing coverage?

The big reason is the universal coverage law the state passed a few years ago, which parts of the federal proposal are based upon.

An Associated Press analysis also said high-income states in general tend to have high rates of coverage, and Massachusetts is a high-income state.

And what about the Third Congressional District leading the way?

McGovern said generous employers and strong unions in the district have provided for employees.

Another reason is that the University of Massachusetts Medical Center in Worcester is one of the district's largest employers.

Of course, McGovern could not help but joke that the real reason is, "They have a heck of a congressman."

JIM HAND covers politics for The Sun Chronicle. His commentaries appear in this space on Saturdays. He can be reached at 508-236-0399 or at jhand@thesunchronicle.com.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » 38 comment(s) « Hide Comments

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 16, 2009 3:37 PM:

" Not playing my game anymore....and yet, here you are! :) "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 16, 2009 2:41 PM:

" The meds ???? Might help you to pay attention and "stay on topic" "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 16, 2009 2:09 PM:

" Again, not a shred of fact in your bulls$it statements...and now you want to bomb Iran. Have you ever done a lick of work in your life? Astounding. "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 16, 2009 1:42 PM:

" Vlad, the meds ??? Comprehension, my lad, comprehension. "...people won't rack up $10K bills to begin with" ???? The meds may help your delusions as well. Not playing your game anymore.....YOU go look it up. "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 16, 2009 1:09 PM:

" But nothing to confirm your analysis - if that's what it is - of academic studies regarding the type of health care reform necessary. Instead, you will hang your hat on a possible tax increase on deductions that most likely won't happen because the idea behind health reform is that people won't rack up $10K bills to begin with. Maggot "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 16, 2009 12:03 PM:

" The only "health reform" that I see as immediately necessary, is that you restart the meds stat, blockhead. Might help you with that "comprehension" issue. "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 16, 2009 7:01 AM:

" Oh yeah, dipstick, what page is that on? "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 15, 2009 6:35 PM:

" Geez, Without even looking up the exact numbers, anyone with a modicum of intelligence knows that academia votes solidly at least 2/3 democrat, and I dare say more. If you want to tell me that Harvard Medical School developed a new procedure to save lives, all well & good, but don't tell me that because some libtard moonbat from Dartmouth or Harvard with a PhD after their name comes out in favor of a socialist government run program, that it must be good.....even if it's the same one who invented the procedure. "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 15, 2009 4:16 PM:

" Don't worry though Anna, when Delay "the Hammer" gets out of jail, he and his congressional buddies can save granny on her deathbed just like he did for Terry Shiavo, and we know how that worked out. "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 15, 2009 4:12 PM:

" Oh Anna, we missed your cherubic wit! Maybe if the republix came clean as to why they oppose health care reform there could be some dialogue (and it isn't because its "socialized"). As you know, we need left wing think tanks to bat down the whacko ideas in right wing think tanks. Or maybe the left is just plain right. Calling Harvard Medical School and Dartmouth left wing or even socialist shows just how little you understand the debate.
All the way with Cato. Yeah! "

Anna D wrote on Oct 15, 2009 4:02 PM:

" Henry Aaron has been shilling for government-run universal healthcare for decades. If people want to play the name-calling game, then it's fair game to say that Brookings, the Center for American Progress and everybody else cited as so-called "health care experta" are in the tank for government-run socialist healthcare. Now here is a link to an interesting liberal Democrat perspective: Robert Reich telling an audience that if politicians (Democrats) were being truthful about healthcare reform, they would admit that Democrats will kill Granny:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT7Y0TOBuG4 "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 15, 2009 12:26 PM:

" You represent the biggest assault on women, minorities and working people everywhere - a topic you know nothing about. Instead of worrying about tax increases for health care and the associated tax credits, maybe you could focus your anger on the cartel of insurance companies that after 63 years, congress may finally brek up. But then they might have to actually compete, and yahoo's like you find that sort of thing un-american. And no, you can't touch my pony tail. "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 14, 2009 4:50 PM:

" Yeah, like all libtards you believe that if you keep repeating your lie (that the tax hike does not exist) long enough, it becomes true. "Sit down to tinkle"...???? There you expose another libtard fallacy you blockhead, in that you espouse full equality for women....unless of course, you want to use women in a derogatory sense, to attack me. Don't forget to put on the birkenstocks....it's cold out there. "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 14, 2009 4:35 PM:

" Sounds to me like I struck a nerve, what with all your assumptions, state worker , ponytails and trustfunds, T retiree, etc. Zip your pants you peice of crap and get a job, deadbeat. What do you do, 47 and livin' with mom, huh? Yeah, we got a real tough guy here, don't we? Real scary, wingnut. I think all you pukes sit down to tinkle, ya know what I'm sayin? OOh, baddass. Read page 21 again:
"here's the math for a taxpayer with say, $10,000 medical expenses: The current deductible is 7.5% of AGI which will increase to 10%. The $2,500 difference at 26% tax rate = $675 tax increase on those who are sick, even if you earn less than $250K....."
It doesn't say any such thing.

I know, I know - Glenn Beck told you...
I'm gonna tie back my ponytail now and pick up my welfare check... "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 14, 2009 4:12 PM:

" Vlad, did I strike a nerve here ? What are you, 11 years old ?.....You sound like it, (with my apologies to all the 11 year olds) State employee hack just killing time on the keyboard at work ? Trust-funded & pony-tailed ? MBTA 23 & out retiree with your 80% kiss in the mail & free health care ? What ????? "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 14, 2009 3:56 PM:

" You are doing what you do best;
L-Y-I-N-G wingnut. "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 14, 2009 3:02 PM:

" Thanks for removing all doubt, Vlad. Where did I ever quote "AHIP" BTW ? OK, I will spell it out for you i-t-s o-n p-a-g-e 2-1 a-t u-s-s-e-n-a-t-e-.-g-o-v, f-i-n-a-n-c-e c-o-m-m-i-t-t-e-e, a p-r-e-s-s r-e-l-e-a-s-e d-a-t-e-d 10-13-09. Question: Can you give me a description of "Health Reform" ? Suggestion: Better get back on your meds. "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 14, 2009 12:28 PM:

" Well since all you can cite is the bogus utterings of AHIP "studies" that come out at the last minute as a desperate attempt to kill reform, I'd say American Progress, Brookings, Harvard, Georgetown, Dartmouth, UCSF medical schools and Institute for Health Policy Studies are solid, yeah, pantywaist. But hey, the insurance companies need pukes like you to maintain those profit margins. And, no, it is not in the bill as you describe it, wingnut.
What a fabulous tool you are. "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 14, 2009 11:41 AM:

" Vlad, I guess I have to come down to your level with the kind of name-calling language that you might understand: Hey clown-boy, is that really the absolute best you can do ???...The Center for American Progress ???...a left-wing think tank (there's an oxymoron for ya')that has no agenda ?....headed by John Podesta, Clinton's former chief of staff. Keep drinking that kool-aid, and the spoon fed pablum from liberal-left organizations such as this. Please tell me again that the tax hike I described below is NOT in the senate fin-comm bill, so that all doubt can be removed that you are not a birkenstock-wearing trust-funded or government-pensioned pony-tailed libtard. "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 14, 2009 11:01 AM:

" Price Waterhouse did a hatchet job for AHIP, just like they did for the tobacco lobby some years ago so take your niggling, erroneous little tax analysis and shove it, wingnut.

The Center for American Progress issued a statement today from "leading health care experts" on the "misleading AHIP report" about the Senate Finance Committee health insurance reform bill. The statement is signed by Henry J. Aaron of the Brookings Institution; David Cutler of Harvard University; Judy Feder of Georgetown University, and a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress; Elliott S. Fisher of Dartmouth Medical School; Arnold Milstein of the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine; Len Nichols of the New America Foundation; and Meredith Rosenthal of Harvard University.

Since you are only into the "facts" as manufactured by AHIP and Wall St (who complained to the insurance companies that they were going to make enough profit)I won't bore you with them. They are available to anyone who wants to find them. If they keep up this crap we may actually go for single payer! Won't that be cool? Aren't you excited?

Say hi to Genn Beck for me Ahole. "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 14, 2009 10:17 AM:

" meant to say "....here's the math for a taxpayer with say, $100K AGI and $10,000 medical expenses"..... "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 14, 2009 10:12 AM:

" Thanks for not disappointing me with the name calling; hey it's the only card those of your ilk can play. I've still yet to hear specifics other than parroting "health care reform." Since you're a tad slow on the uptake, here's the math for a taxpayer with say, $10,000 medical expenses: The current deductible is 7.5% of AGI which will increase to 10%. The $2,500 difference at 26% tax rate = $675 tax increase on those who are sick, even if you earn less than $250K.....so much for that campaign promise, huh ? Since you're not into facts, don't go to ussenate.gov and look it up. "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 13, 2009 8:50 PM:

" Just what is it with you nimrod wingnut dingbats? Pack your bags and screw moron. You are hopelessly clueless. This so-called study by AHIP is so cooked and full of kitty litter it makes the birthers look sane. But it is a sweet gift, since the insurers claim they must raise rates by 110% because they can't make enough in penalties off of you freedom lovin' nitwits who don't get health insurance. AHIP MAKES THE CASE FOR THE PUBLIC OPTION!
Thank you, thank you very much. "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 12, 2009 1:04 PM:

" Can't support it Vlad ? Why don't you read up on it, instead of just repeating talking points from Olbermann & Maddow ? It's a FACT, Jack. How about the FACT that the senate fin comm bill is going to add about $1,700 to the cost of our health insurance to be used to cover the uninsured ? Please feel free to call me more names now..... considering the source, it's an honor. "

Anna D wrote on Oct 11, 2009 4:36 PM:

" 1-20-2013: engaging the witless is pointless and adds nothing to the discussion. Just keep making your points and ignore that annoying buzz in the background. It's just a dim-witted insect. "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 11, 2009 4:25 PM:

" And here I thought Anna was talking about inelegant aliens.

Ken, are you retarded or just a little gossip spreading yet more disinformation. Everyone knows I'm in the employ of Bernie Sanders!

1-20-2013-nothing could be more rabid than the wingnut rants in today's paper. That Crowell is mentally ill.

Personally I hope you scumbags are taxed until your ears bleed. "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 11, 2009 3:54 PM:

" And you 1-20-2013 cannot support even one of your so-called facts. Read the bill moron, instead of mouthing FOX news blather. Your $600 tax increase is a lie and a scare tactic. What more details do you need to know about a state with only one insurer? The problem lies with you greedy punks who choose to lobby for the insurance companies while we have a well paid congress to do it for them. "

Anna D wrote on Oct 10, 2009 9:35 PM:

" illegal; not illegants.... "

Anna D wrote on Oct 10, 2009 9:34 PM:

" I am curious as to the prevalence of illegant aliens living in those states with the highest rates of uninsureds. My guess would be that those states that have a higher rate of illegals also have a higher rate of uninsured. "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 10, 2009 6:12 PM:

" Thanks Ken, that wouldn't surprise me. Hey, the best he's got is a foaming-at-the mouth diatribe of name calling, since he is unable to refute the facts of my earlier post. Typical liberal response. "

ken wrote on Oct 10, 2009 5:26 PM:

" It has been rumored that Vlad is a paid political hack for McGovern and Barney Frank. Haven't been able to prove it yet. But his job is spread hatred and racism against those who oppose the Socio-Communist agenda of Obama and company.

That is why he shows up everyday.

It is best to pose your argument and ignore is child-like drivel. "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 10, 2009 1:15 PM:

" I see by your handle that you are as excited as I am about Barack Hussein Obama's re-election MM MM MM!

As far as engaging in a battle of wits, I show up every day while wingnuts like you work yourselves into a frenzy, make some outburst and then claim that no one else's opinion is worthy. So keep surfing those wingnut web-sites for the shrill nonsense you clowns keep spewing while we get the much needed job of health care reform done.
BTW, we no longer need consensus from buttholes such as yourself. This is my state; you and your wingnut friends are only guests here "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 10, 2009 1:01 PM:

" Wow. That's a great response Vlad, apparently the best you've got. It really doesn't make sense for me to engage further in a battle of wits with someone such as yourself who comes to the field unarmed. "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 10, 2009 11:58 AM:

" The republicans are very, very sick. They should go to the nearest emergency room for treatment (and so should you 1-20-2013)

The 5.7 million uninsured Texans ought to organize a Tea-Bag march on Crawford, just to see how numbnuts is coming with that brush-clearing. heh-heh "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 10, 2009 11:43 AM:

" Yeah Right, like passing a 1,000 page bill with 500 amendments called "Health Reform" that they didn't read, and won't post it all on the web ? Where's that "tranparency" that your messiah promised that we'd have ? Further, where are the dems in pointing out all the wonderful new specific features of the bill, other than saying "We need Health Reform ?" (Sound of Crickets) Yep, they're all back in the district touting the efficiency and solvency of other government programs like medicare, social security, amtrak, fannie & freddie, the USPO, medicaid, etc. Keep drinking that Kool-Aid Vlad, i.e., Hand's slanted and unbalanced editorial rants. He notes that "Alabama really only has one insurance company..." doesn't give any details, and doesn't balance it with the fact that the republicans want to remedy that by allowing insurers to sell across state lines. I'll take the facts over your "truth" anyday. BTW, are you aware that the senate finance committee part of this bill to be voted on next week, has a provision to increase the deductible amount for medical expenses of itemized deductions ? Bottom line is an approx $600 tax increase for folks with major medical expenses. Oh, did I mention that this applies to folks earning under $ 250,000 a year ? Just another broken campaign promise, oh well !!!! "

VladsBack!! wrote on Oct 10, 2009 9:41 AM:

" Why, it's the truth. "

1-20-2013 wrote on Oct 10, 2009 9:08 AM:

" Isn't it long past time that Hand's every Saturday, page 2, and ever-predictably slanted "Democrats are wonderful, Republicans suck" column is taken off a NEWS page, and put on the EDITORIAL page where it belongs ? "

gimmesum wrote on Oct 10, 2009 8:04 AM:

" Of course, Mcgovern is joking. Even though Kerry insists Kennedy deserved credit for Massachusetts health insurance system, to my knowledge none of them had anything to do with it.

Now, if we can only get costs down. "