34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Angry area cops join protest at UMass




Appearance of speaker with ties to terrorist group draws ire
Area police joined about 300 officers from across the state Thursday night at the University of Massachusetts to protest the appearance of a speaker tied to a domestic terror group responsible in the early 1980s for the murder of a New Jersey state trooper and a shootout with state police in North Attleboro.

The police officers stood in the cold outside a building at the state college's Amherst campus for more than two hours to protest the appearance of Pat Levasseur, the former wife of Raymond Luc Levasseur.

The Levasseurs were members of the United Freedom Front, a domestic terror group responsible for the 1981 killing of New Jersey State Trooper Philip Lamonaco during a traffic stop and a shootout in 1982 with two Massachusetts state troopers in the rest area on Interstate 95 in North Attleboro.

After a week of controversy, Raymond Luc Levasseur, 60, of Maine, was denied permission from the U.S. Parole Commission to travel to Amherst to speak.

However, his former wife and co-defendant in a 1989 sedition trial held in Springfield, was scheduled to speak to students about the sedition trial and social change, along with lawyers from the defense team and a juror. Mansfield Police Sgt. Larry Crosman and Attleboro Detective Sgt. Arthur Brillon were among a group of 15 area police officers who drove by bus to the join the law enforcement contingent protesting the forum and supporting Lamonaco's widow, Donna, and her daughter outside the building.

"I fully respect everyone's right to freedom of speech. But personally, I find it insulting that a state college is being used as a platform for his ideology," said Brillon, who carried a sign that read "Cop Killers Not Welcome Here."

"We're here standing next to his widow and his daughter and we're standing with hundreds of state police, police officers and police chiefs," said Crosman, who carried as sign that read "Shame on UMass."

"They chose to protest by blowing up courthouses and killing a trooper. But we're protesting here the right way," Crosman said.

Now a carpenter, Raymond Luc Levasseur was convicted in 1986 for bombings to protest U.S. backing of South African apartheid and right-wing death squads in Central America. He served 18 years of a 45-year sentence, and was paroled in 2004.

In 1982, two members of the United Freedom Front were involved in a shootout with two Massachusetts State Troopers at the rest area on I-95 in North Attleboro.

The shootout occurred around 2 a.m. on Feb. 7, 1982, when troopers Michael Crosby and Paul Landry were performing a vehicle safety check in the rest area.

The troopers found two men in a station wagon who began acting suspiciously when the troopers arrived. There was also a Doberman pinscher and two duffelbags in the car.

During a subsequent investigation, Landry found that the passenger was wearing body armor and warned Crosby when the driver suddenly exchanged shots with police.

The driver ran and escaped but the troopers captured the passenger. All escaped injury. The driver fled the state and was later captured. The two men were convicted on charges related to the shootout.

State police found a cache of weapons in the station wagon, along with the Doberman, which initially held troopers at bay.

After the shootout, North Attleboro police went house-to-house on Kelley Boulevard searching for the shooter.

Raymond Luc Levasseur was on the FBI's 10 Most Wanted List from 1977 to 1984 for a string of bank robberies and bombings of government buildings in New England for which the United Freedom Front claimed responsibility.

The bombings Levasseur was arrested for included a 1976 explosion in the Suffolk Superior Courthouse. He was acquitted of the courthouse bombing and of attempting to overthrow the U.S. government following a 10-month U.S. District Court sedition trial in Springfield.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » 14 comment(s) « Hide Comments

Vladsback!! wrote on Nov 13, 2009 6:42 PM:

" So Jan the death penalty is acceptable to you because you are a Christian. Extreme views such as yours can be found in any religion, Islam for instance. Or any ideology elevated to religious furvor. It's an extremist's view.
I'm with RLincoln. "

Jan wrote on Nov 13, 2009 5:51 PM:

" I agree with Kevin's post.

Also, to RLincoln, I am a Christian, and I know that in Biblical days, people who were guilty of heinous crimes were taken outside of the city and stoned to death. So, in fact, the death penalty was acceptable then, and it's acceptable to me now. "

s-plumb wrote on Nov 13, 2009 3:19 PM:

" Our tax dollars at work...
We'll give up anything to be politically correct.
Hasan the terrorist, who is portrayed to be "troubled" victim, while his business cards indicated that he was a So(A): Soldier of Allah.
What is wrong with this country? Time to wake up! "

realist wrote on Nov 13, 2009 2:36 PM:

" If the administrators have no control over the faculty then why do we have administrators, besides to employ political hacks? "

sunfan wrote on Nov 13, 2009 1:17 PM:

" Check out this statement from UMass at
http://www.umass.edu/newsoffice/newsreleases/articles/95277.php

The administration claims that, "The university administration did not invite this speaker and would not invite him. A group of faculty members has decided to invite him. Although the university administration questions the wisdom and common sense of this judgment, the institution must respect academic freedom."

Freedom for convicted felons must be respected, but the freedom of individual citizens and law enforcement not to be victims of bombings and killings must NOT be respected?

Who are these faculty members? Why would any responsible educational institution (continue to) employ them?

When you start defending someone's right to promote bombers and killers, and are too cowardly to put a stop to it, you're not very far from the Army's position of allowing extremists to serve as psychiatrists, now are you. Too many people are bending over backwards to be PC and allowing criminals free rein in the process. "

sunfan wrote on Nov 13, 2009 1:07 PM:

" SHAME on UMass for bringing dirtbags like the Levasseurs to campus to speak.
Why aren't they and their hangers-on still in jail, where they belong? It's a travesty. I wouldn't put it past those twits in Amherst to invited Whitey Bulger to speak. "

RLincoln wrote on Nov 13, 2009 12:13 PM:

" It always amazes me, the hypocrisy of extremists from both ends of the political spectrum whose agenda is to kill people who are involved in killing people (murderers of abortion doctors, for instance). They claim life is sacred, yet their first tactic is to take lifes, often innocent ones.

But that is the basis behind the supporters of the death penalty, who don't see that as extremist, and who, ironically, call themselves Christians even in defiance of Christ's own teachings. "

jrjrg123 wrote on Nov 13, 2009 10:11 AM:

" Levasseur couldn't make the trip so he sent his ex-wife to represent his views. Wow what a score, they must be real desperate for speakers at U Mass. You would think the university could find some with a tad more credibility. "

topnogg wrote on Nov 13, 2009 10:04 AM:

" Too bad that the cops arresting them in the 80's didn't waste these dirtbag hippies right there and then. "

atticus wrote on Nov 13, 2009 9:44 AM:

" This is truly shameful, U. Mass. must be plugging for membership in the Ivy League. What next? Remnants of the Bader-Meinhoff Gang?

Along with a participant, attorneys and a juror, why not members of the victims families? That would have made an interesting "round table".

These "arbiters of social change" were nearly forgotten, why weren't they left that way?

Blowing up buildings and slaying police officers is not a "point of view". "

realist wrote on Nov 13, 2009 9:25 AM:

" When I was studying Poli Sci in the 70's there was a movement among what passes at college for limousine liberals to have a PLO rep come and speak. I said that would be fine and that I would be working with a couple of the campus Jewish groups and a veterans org to stage a protest. I was accused of hindering free speech. I asked why is free speech for a terrorist considered sacred but not for a kid from Attleboro? The idea was eventually dropped by the group.
Its the same thing now. A radical murdering group has the right to free speech and protesters are accused of hindering it by exercising their own free speech.
Of course with one of our president's good buddies a terrorist turned professor I think we will see more of this. "

Betsy wrote on Nov 13, 2009 8:30 AM:

" With all the bright, interesting, accomplished, engaging and respected contributors to an improved society available from throughout the country to tell their stories, UMass invites this arbiter of "social change?" Why? "

lonicutter wrote on Nov 13, 2009 8:18 AM:

" Why can't we all just get along??? Law abiding citizens and felonious murderers should be able to sit down and talk about things like reasonable people. Terrorist bombers are people too ya' know. "

kevin h. wrote on Nov 13, 2009 7:34 AM:

" UMass...So open-minded, their brains have fallen out. "