GOP Senate hopefuls talk health care
By GLEN JOHNSON ASSOCIATED PRESS
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 2:18 AM EST
State Sen. Scott Brown speaks during a debate for the GOP U.S. Senate candidates sponsored by the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce in Boston Monday as businessman Jack E. Robinson listens. The candidates are vying for the seat previously held by Sen. Edward Kennedy. (Associated Press photo)
Brown, Robinson at odds over state's plan, national issue
BOSTON - The two Republicans running to succeed the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy clashed Monday about whether Massachusetts should serve as a model for the nation's health care overhaul.
State Sen. Scott Brown of Wrentham lauded the near-universal coverage created by the 2006 bill. But he said restrictions and tax elements of the current U.S. House and Senate bills would have the adverse effect of reducing benefits already existing in Massachusetts.
"I'm thankful that we've done something here in Massachusetts, but the other states really should step up and do their own health care plans and bear their own costs," Brown said during a candidate forum sponsored by the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce. "We should not be subsidizing other states for their health insurance while we're doing it properly here."
Duxbury businessman and attorney Jack E. Robinson said the Massachusetts bill has failed to control costs. He said people should be allowed to buy insurance across state lines, spurring sufficient private competition to create universal coverage.
"The way to solve our health care problem is to create incentives for private market competition," Robinson said. "It's no different from any other industry, health care, education, making widgets: Competition brings down costs."
Kennedy died Aug. 25 of brain cancer. Brown and Robinson are the two Republicans vying to replace him. Four people are seeking the Democratic nomination: Attorney General Martha Coakley, Rep. Michael Capuano, City Year co-founder Alan Khazei and Boston Celtics co-owner Stephen Pagliuca.
The party primaries are Dec. 8, and the special election is Jan. 19.
Both Brown and Robinson face a daunting challenge in their campaigns: Kennedy was a Democratic icon in a heavily Democratic state. The governor of Massachusetts, all six of its constitutional officers, the majorities in both of its legislative chambers and its entire congressional delegation are Democratic.
The sparse crowd of 60 who met for breakfast at a financial district hotel underscored the lack of attention the GOP primary race has received. When the four Democrats met at the same hour and same day last month, more than 400 people were in attendance.
Robinson, a perennial political candidate who attended both Harvard Law and Business schools, cast himself as an entrepreneur. He cited work in the airline and wireless telephone industries as he claimed to have created more than 1,000 jobs during his career.
"I'm a progressive Republican," he told the crowd.
Both he and Brown highlighted their no-new-taxes pledges, and Brown said his work in Wrentham town government, as well as the Massachusetts House and state Senate, has been focused on job creation and elimination of unnecessary government regulation.
"The cost of business is out of control and people are afraid to expand," he said.
Moderator Bill Purcell, the former mayor of Nashville, Tenn., and a professor at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, focused his questions on issues of interest to the Chamber's business membership.
Both Brown and Robinson said they would oppose both the House and Senate health care bills. The Democratic Senate candidates have been casting themselves as the vital 60th vote to prevent a Republican filibuster on the legislation.
On the subject of a second federal stimulus bill, Robinson said the first bill had boosted government but not private-sector job creation. He said he favored a complete elimination of the federal capital gains tax for 2010 to promote business investment and entrepreneurship.
If that were done, he said, "We'll be out of the recession, in my opinion, by the end of next year."
Brown called eliminating the tax impractical, but he said the country does not need a second stimulus bill and should instead move to reclaim the unspent portion of the original bill.
He called for the government to target spending on infrastructure, both to create construction jobs and add the benefits of capital improvements.
"We don't need another trillion dollars of debt added onto our $12 trillion of national debt," Brown said.
On education, Robinson said he supported the federal government setting educational standards, while Brown said he wanted more funding for the No Child Left Behind education law pushed by Kennedy and the most recent Republican president, George W. Bush.
"No Child Left Behind," he said. "Great idea, but they didn't really provide the resources to finish the job."
View Comments » 25 comment(s)
« Hide Comments
kevin h. wrote on Nov 25, 2009 2:43 PM:
You and your Democrat ilk just LOVE to restrict freedom. "
s-plumb wrote on Nov 24, 2009 4:24 PM:
VladsBack!! wrote on Nov 24, 2009 4:10 PM:
artie lange wrote on Nov 24, 2009 4:04 PM:
s-plumb wrote on Nov 24, 2009 3:03 PM:
With Mr. Robinson, in the race, it appears we'll have a choice between 2 progressive GOP candidates.
These guys just not understand what's being said. NO "
BARBARIC wrote on Nov 24, 2009 2:43 PM:
Cheers Senator Brown for standing up for yourself and your family!
That said, if legalizing gay marriage federally is of the highest concern for some of you then I don't know what to say. For it or against it, I just personally feel like gay marriage is the least of all of our concerns right now, especially in MA where it's already allowed. "
VladsBack!! wrote on Nov 24, 2009 1:44 PM:
1-20-2013 wrote on Nov 24, 2009 1:36 PM:
rabblerouser wrote on Nov 24, 2009 1:33 PM:
I as an "unenrolled" voter will be taking a Democratic ballot in the primary to vote for Steve Pagliuca. This career businessman is much more palatable than any of the other candidates on the Democratic ballot.
If it comes down to Brown and Pagliuca, I could live with either choice.
Martha the dolt doesn't get my vote! "
GetItRight wrote on Nov 24, 2009 1:25 PM:
artie lange wrote on Nov 24, 2009 1:14 PM:
s-plumb wrote on Nov 24, 2009 1:13 PM:
In my estimation we will not be out of the recession. Only a fool would believe otherwise.
No wonder we cannot get a foothold in this state.
Write me if you'd like suggestions on how to run for office.
splumb2009@yahoo.com "
gimmesum wrote on Nov 24, 2009 1:11 PM:
I know couples, gay and staight, old and young who simply do not want or need the state's blessing on their union. They certainly wouldn't mind the financial benefits afforded the married. But it just goes against their core belief that a civil marriage license is an instrument that legislates morality. "
IShouldBeMayor wrote on Nov 24, 2009 1:09 PM:
1-20-2013 wrote on Nov 24, 2009 1:07 PM:
Please tell me about your currently-elected "heroes" though. "
GetItRight wrote on Nov 24, 2009 12:38 PM:
1-20-2013 wrote on Nov 24, 2009 12:14 PM:
Hey, by the sound of it, you have already voted for the Bozos....let's see, 12 of them from MA in DC, and the Guv, Lt.Guv, AG, and the majority party on Bacon ("e" not required) Hill. "
GetItRight wrote on Nov 24, 2009 12:01 PM:
IShouldBeMayor wrote on Nov 24, 2009 11:52 AM:
VladsBack!! wrote on Nov 24, 2009 11:15 AM:
Drfill wrote on Nov 24, 2009 10:39 AM:
GetItRight wrote on Nov 24, 2009 10:26 AM:
artie lange wrote on Nov 24, 2009 8:26 AM:
kevin h. wrote on Nov 24, 2009 8:14 AM:
This from Boston.com:
"Brown has stepped in controversy in his career, most recently in 2007 when, at a student assembly at King Philip Regional High School, he quoted profanities verbatim from student Facebook postings that had criticized Brown and his daughter."
To say it his favorite past time is just a lie.
Your obsession with clowns make one think that perhaps you had a traumatic experience with one in your youth.
Democrats favorite past time is taxing,spending, and mandating what others do. That is provable every day.
It's time for real change in Massachusetts. Lower taxes and greater freedom, the true message of the Constitution, will allow the people the natural right to self determination, to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, without the burden of an oppressive government.
Take your morning slander and stuff it. "
tallyho57 wrote on Nov 24, 2009 7:17 AM: