34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Area's jobless down




The unemployment rate dropped in 10 area communities in October, fueling hopes that the economy is turning around.

An encouraging sign, economist Alan Clayton-Matthews said, is the statewide rate also went down because more people found jobs, rather than giving up hope and dropping out of the labor force.

"That is certainly a good thing," said Clayton-Matthews, associate professor of public policy at Northeastern University.

"Unemployment really did go down. I think things are improving," he said.

Clayton-Matthews said one-month improvements are not proof that the economy is on the upswing, but the October numbers are too good to ignore. The statewide unemployment rate dropped to 8.9 percent from 9.3 percent.

Every community in The Sun Chronicle circulation area also enjoyed improvements.

Attleboro's unemployment rate dipped to 10.7 percent from 11.3 percent in September. North Attleboro went from 10.9 percent to 10.2 percent. Mansfield has one of the lowest jobless rates in the area at 7.2 percent, down from 8.0 percent.

More than 250 Attleboro residents found jobs in October. North Attleboro gained a similar amount, while Mansfield's job picture improvement by 180.

Clayton-Matthews, who tracks employment for the New England Economic Partnership, said businesses may have laid off so many people that they now have to rehire some to keep up with demand.

An improved export market is helping to revive business in Massachusetts, he said.

The state Division of Labor and Workforce Development said the job gains were in the areas of professional, science and business services, along with education and health care.

On the downside, manufacturing, financial services and state and local government are still shedding jobs, the agency said.

State government laid off 700 workers in October, bringing the total for the year to 4,000. Local governments reduced their rolls by 100 in October for a yearly total of 5,300.

State Rep. Betty Poirier, R-North Attleboro, said everyone is hoping for a turnaround in the economy, but she is still hearing "stories of desperation" from constituents. Poirier said she receives a steady stream of calls from people who have lost their jobs and are in danger of losing their homes.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » 11 comment(s) « Hide Comments

s-plumb wrote on Nov 26, 2009 9:05 AM:

" No what? I never claimed that what has occurred (ie gov't bail-outs & behind the scene deals w/gov't) has anything to do with capitalism. Every bank that was said to be failing should have been allowed to fail.
This is more like socialism than capitalism. "

jillk wrote on Nov 25, 2009 8:35 PM:

" No splumb, the reason we are where we are at today is because the capitalist pigs on Wall Street. Greed will kill the captialist, Marx said, and it's coming true. Next time you are in Bank of America, ask them if they have any intentions of dropping their outrageous fees ... fees designed to steal the common man's money. Welfare isn't the problem (nor is illegal immigration) but WELFARE for the rich is. But, splumb, I notice you support them so carry on with your conspiracy theories about Obama. "

s-plumb wrote on Nov 25, 2009 12:11 PM:

" The entire population in attleboro from 20 y/o to 65 y/o is 25082. If all were able to work and on the rolls, an increase of 250 jobs would be 1%. Why do the figures "bragged about" reflect only 0.6% gain?
So which is it; 250 (1%) or 170ish (.6%)? "

s-plumb wrote on Nov 25, 2009 10:57 AM:

" Is it more likely that all of the approx 175 individuals of the approx 2850 found work, or did they move away while looking, give up completely, retired, or are on welfare? I'm sure some found work, but it may even be seasonal. And no Virginia, the economy is not improving. "

s-plumb wrote on Nov 25, 2009 10:24 AM:

" 1st) Recessions are part of a normal economic cycle; just as booms are. Govt interference is NOT.
2nd) Bush was in office when the recession began, and unfortunately was in charge of the 1st bail-out; A huge economic disaster.

Now, 0bamas far more radical policies, will not create a single permanent job, and will soon bury us all. These progressive policies, started under Bush, are the most glaring reason we are in this situation. "

common_sense wrote on Nov 25, 2009 10:22 AM:

" correct me if I'm wrong...but this is the SC reporting not the WSJ so take it for what's its worth. But they did manage to get this in;

An encouraging sign, economist Alan Clayton-Matthews said, is the statewide rate also went down because more people found jobs, rather than giving up hope and dropping out of the labor force.

And you can spin it anyway you want, but certainly you are hearing less and less about job losses these days. The economy IS improving (certainly not as fast as we would like), I know we are planning on adding people, we are really busy. "

qtrback wrote on Nov 25, 2009 9:53 AM:

" Correct me if I am wrong, but this statistic only shows that less people are collecting unemployment benefits but doesn't tell if the folks that are no longer collecting have actually found jobs......not as dumb as they think. "

celt wrote on Nov 25, 2009 8:57 AM:

" Let the spinning begin. When things are undeniably better, the wingnuts will say Bush did it. "

s-plumb wrote on Nov 25, 2009 8:29 AM:

" The recession began in early part of '08. Many folks were offered incentives to part with their employers early, with a bridge to retirement. Other laid off workers are just falling off the books, after their benefits ran out. With an unperceivable change in the official rate, it's more likely than not that more people are out of work this month than last. The only difference is the manner they collect or do without benefits. This is a scary report that should make us all take notice. After all, the recession is officially over. "

gimmesum wrote on Nov 25, 2009 8:00 AM:

" I also would not rely on month to month data to foretell the future or illustrate a trend. Where were we last year at this time? "

kevin h. wrote on Nov 25, 2009 7:54 AM:

" Some interesting data would be rise or fall of per capita income for the area.
Are the new jobs well paying, or is it just work? "