Rocketeers blast Bombardiers
BY PETER GOBIS SUN CHRONICLE STAFF
Friday, November 27, 2009 10:05 AM EST
Senior members of the North Attleboro High football team pose after beating Attleboro Thursday. (Staff photo by Mike George)
NORTH ATTLEBORO - It was flawless football, or a near execution to perfection of the playbook - such that not even fans of the North Attleboro High School Red Rocketeers saw what was coming - or often occurring - at Raymond Beaupre Field on the campus Thanksgiving Day morning.
Least of which were the Bombardiers of Attleboro High, who were blind-sided, baffled and left speechless after North Attleboro played with poise and purposefulness en route to a 45-12 victory Thursday.
Senior quarterback Joe Kummer, the L.G. Balfour Trophy Award winner as the most outstanding offensive player in the 90th renewal of the series, produced 171 yards of offense (33 rushing, 138 passing) and four touchdowns (two rushing, two throwing).
Senior running back-linebacker Brett Mastropoll, the L.G. Balfour Trophy Award winner as the most outstanding player on defense in the 89th holiday meeting between North and Attleboro, produced 124 yards of offense and led a Rocketeer defense which rendered the Bombardiers rudderless.
Aside from Matt Campbell's touchdown runs of 48 yards (in the first quarter, narrowing North's lead to 7-6) and a 67-yard romp with two minutes left in the first half, Attleboro was left gasping - surrendering three turnovers to the Rocketeers, notching just five first-half first downs, yielding field position and being unable to make a stop, North having 16 first-half rushes for five yards or more.
North's Jeremy Roache, left, snares Attleboro's Matty Campbell, right. Campbell had 135 yards rushing on the day, including two long runs for both of the Bombardier touchdowns.
"The line dominated, they deserved both Balfour trophies," exclaimed Kummer, who completed four first-half passes for 88 yards, directing the Rocketeers
on scoring drives of 56, 67, 6, 58 and 54 yards during the first half - North taking a 35-12 lead by intermission.
"As long as we moved the ball three or four yards at a time, I thought that we'd have a chance to win," said Mastropoll, who gained 53 running yards, 34 receiving yards and three first-half first downs, while booming a 46-yard punt to the AHS six-yard line which helped set up North's third touchdown, the first of three second-quarter scores.
The list of luminaries was endless for North: Senior kicker Corey Wynn belted six conversion kicks through the uprights, in addition to lacing a 30-yard field goal goal in the fourth quarter; senior defensive end Jeremy Roche latched onto a Bombardier fumble at the AHS six-yard line to help create a 21-6 lead for the Rocketeers in the second quarter; junior defensive back Danny Johnson plucked off a Bombardier pass at midfield at the end of the first half; senior defensive back Steve Sellner came down with another aerial takeaway two plays into the fourth quarter; junior wide receiver Ryan Flannery hauled in a 40-yard scoring strike from Kummer with 70 ticks left on the clock in the second quarter and a two-yarder with 56 ticks on the clock in the third quarter; and North's defensive front of Roche, Josh Mullaney, Will Kummer and Elias Sarkis limited Campbell to 20 yards rushing (aside from his two TD runs), held Ryan Araujo to one yard rushing, while forcing QB Nate Robitaille into seven incomplete, first-half passes and just 16 yards rushing.
"One of our advantages was up front with our quickness," said North coach Donny Johnson, praising both the Big Red offensive and defensive lines. "With all the trapping and counters that we run (on offense), they did an excellent job. To beat them we knew that we would have to get ahead of them."
In truth, immediately after Campbell shed a pair of Rocketeer would-be tacklers within four yards of the line of scrimmage for the first of his two TD runs (aided by a 37-yard Robitaille to Araujo pass), North immediately responded - with a 67-yard, eight-play drive that consumed 3:10 of the clock.
Danny Lang (113 yards of offense) bolted 19 yards on a reverse to the AHS 41 and 11 yards to the AHS five; Kummer completed a 14-yard pass to Johnson (51 yards of offense) to the AHS 27, then the Rocketeer QB followed the blocking of Barrett Holden and Josh Chretien into the end zone from a yard out.
Kummer and Mastropoll combined on passing plays of 16 and 18 yards in North's first offensive series of the game - a 56-yard, seven-play drive that consumed 3:28 of the clock - that set up the Rocketeers' go-ahead touchdown, a six-yard sweep along the right side by Lang.
"The whole key is Kummer, with his quick feet and quick hands," added Johnson of the quarterback's decision-making. "We were afraid to give them the ball back."
The Bombardiers were unable to convert on five of their first six offensive series, other than Campbell's touchdown, never advancing beyond the North 48.
And while Campbell's 67-yard touchdown run on the AHS' seventh series (narrowing North's lead to 28-12) put a bit of a scare into the Rocketeers, the Big Red once again immediately responded to the challenge.
Johnson returned the kickoff (after North elected to accept a five-yard AHS offside penalty on the initial kickoff) to the Rocketeer 46 and three plays later, Kummer spotted Flannery alone over the middle, gathering in the ball and eluding two would-be tacklers for a 40-yard scoring play.
"North executed with their speed," said AHS coach Kevin Deschenes. "We couldn't stop their speed. They were faster than us on the line and we were not able to contain them. They just played a lot faster than us."
Not just that, but North was turnover free too, not allowing AHS to begin a drive until the fourth quarter beyond its own 26-yard line.
Mastropoll's 46-yard punt to the AHS six-yard line set the stage for what may have been the Bombardiers' back-breaking series. Two plays into that drive, a botched handoff exchange resulted in Roche pouncing on the pigskin at the six-yard line. And on the very first play of North's series, Johnson scored behind the blocking of guard Brendan Curtis.
By halftime, North had amassed 243 yards of offense, 15 first downs and a 23-point lead.
"I thought that it'd be close, we all did," said Mastropoll.
The Rocketeers drove 73 yards on 10 plays, consuming 3:55 of the clock on their second series of the second half to assume 42-12 command. In that march, Lang grabbed a 20-yard pass from Kummer, advancing the ball to the AHS 40, then raced 25 yards to the AHS 15 on the very next play - the drive culminating with Flannery catching his second TD toss from Kummer out on the left flank.
Then the Rocketeers drove 64 yards on nine plays, consuming 5:15 of the clock, finishing off the rout with Wynn launching his 30-yard field goal. In that sequence, Wynn rushed for 16 yards to the AHS 37 and Mastropoll bulled 14 yards to the AHS 19. The Bombardiers, meanwhile, never advanced beyond the North 45 on any of their three second-half series.
"They (AHS) have a lot of weapons," said Johnson, the first-year NAHS head coach amidst the post-game celebration, the Rocketeers winning their fourth straight game, their eighth game of the season and their 55th overall in the annual rivalry (15 of the last 16 meetings). "We never expected this."
View Comments » 77 comment(s)
« Hide Comments
rmj3 wrote on Dec 31, 2009 8:02 PM:
3189 wrote on Dec 30, 2009 8:05 AM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 29, 2009 5:11 PM:
3189 wrote on Dec 29, 2009 11:21 AM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 29, 2009 11:00 AM:
3189 wrote on Dec 29, 2009 10:13 AM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 29, 2009 9:50 AM:
3189 wrote on Dec 28, 2009 12:44 PM:
SmarterThanYou wrote on Dec 26, 2009 4:59 PM:
tootall wrote on Dec 26, 2009 3:56 PM:
Football fan wrote on Dec 26, 2009 9:43 AM:
RealPride wrote on Dec 24, 2009 4:56 PM:
fred17b wrote on Dec 24, 2009 7:43 AM:
3189 wrote on Dec 23, 2009 5:05 PM:
Football fan wrote on Dec 23, 2009 3:16 PM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 23, 2009 2:58 PM:
3189 wrote on Dec 23, 2009 12:23 PM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 23, 2009 10:31 AM:
3189 wrote on Dec 23, 2009 7:15 AM:
Football Fan wrote on Dec 21, 2009 6:46 PM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 21, 2009 4:56 PM:
3189 wrote on Dec 21, 2009 3:26 PM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 18, 2009 11:38 AM:
Mark M. Farinella wrote on Dec 18, 2009 11:15 AM:
RealPride wrote on Dec 18, 2009 12:42 AM:
3189 wrote on Dec 17, 2009 11:11 AM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 17, 2009 8:33 AM:
Scott "
3189 wrote on Dec 17, 2009 7:10 AM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 16, 2009 3:01 PM:
3189 wrote on Dec 14, 2009 8:07 AM:
tootall wrote on Dec 12, 2009 5:53 PM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 11, 2009 4:12 PM:
Mark M. Farinella wrote on Dec 11, 2009 3:56 PM:
Now, it would be great if everyone would quit bickering under this story and instead find more constructive ways to support the AHS athletic program. "
slimsmitty1602 wrote on Dec 11, 2009 1:23 PM:
Attleboro is a school where kids usually dont come out for sports. reasons why? who knows, but for a school of that size it should be relevent in more sports then a couple. on football, u cant have it both ways. should more kids get the opportunity to play? yes. but that is proven in practice!!!! should 14 kids play the whole game? no. but do more to prove why you should be out there. and i dont think its attleboro's fault they have had to deal with dartmouth and b-r dominating this league for a few years now.
Attleboro should go to the Hock. it will give them a chance to face real competition and with a few winning seasons the teams will be looking good and this whole convo will be irrelevent.(check the spelling there) "
tootall wrote on Dec 11, 2009 1:18 PM:
tootall wrote on Dec 11, 2009 1:14 PM:
3189 wrote on Dec 11, 2009 7:04 AM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 10, 2009 9:52 PM:
3189 wrote on Dec 10, 2009 12:06 PM:
3189 wrote on Dec 10, 2009 12:06 PM:
RealPride wrote on Dec 10, 2009 9:44 AM:
SER21 wrote on Dec 9, 2009 10:40 PM:
sportsnut72 wrote on Dec 9, 2009 3:12 PM:
Mark, this has been done and I offered to go to MAII (think that is it) and by the time Mr. Houle got off his butt and saw emails it was too late. I have taped games where kids are playing more than 48 minutes per week between JV and V levels (illegal) and I will have MAII there next year, not for my kid who does not play but for others who parents are chicken to say anything. OTHER KIDS NEED TO PLAY AND SHOW TALENT ALSO!!
Pop Warner every where takes money and are the snottiest of an organization (like Babe Ruth).. the problem is parents like I want to coach (and I am female) and are turned down as people who kiss butt and play favorites (even when they are NOT good) will still be coaches or the board.
I have never seen a HS football organization like this in my life, and I was in a successful HS in RI growing up (Cranston) and where my son just came from (Northern RI). Northern RI coaches play kids on ONE side of the ball and based on talent. Deschenes and Houle want kids that are close to 6 foot and over 180, even if they are NOT talanted and play like crap. To me that is NO ORGANIZATION! "
sbcoach wrote on Dec 9, 2009 2:26 PM:
Mark M. Farinella wrote on Dec 9, 2009 10:35 AM:
sportsnut72 wrote on Dec 9, 2009 9:59 AM:
sportsnut72 wrote on Dec 9, 2009 9:57 AM:
In addition he has "blue and white" plays that do not do anything for players on blocking plays as all he does is put the kid in motion. No blocking, just pass and running plays.
Where we were in another NE state the coaches let everyone play, and were three strings back of players. The only time you played multiple sides was on kick-offs.
AHS deserves to lose for until they get a coach that knows "how to" play, this JV squad that was "undefeated" is going to lose as the Varsity always does. "
sportsnut72 wrote on Dec 9, 2009 9:55 AM:
The coach is so concerned with who he knows, height, weight and not the talent of the kids. He plays Iron Man Football where the kids from JV play both sides of the ball (JV) and play varsity also. This is not fair to kids who transfer or do not get to show their talent off. In addition he has "blue and white" plays that do not do anything for players on blocking plays as all he does is put the kid in motion. No blocking, just pass and running plays.
Where we were in another NE state the coaches let everyone play, and were three strings back of players. The only time you played multiple sides was on kick-offs.
AHS deserves to lose for until they get a coach that knows "how to" play, this JV squad that was "undefeated" is going to lose as the Varsity always does. "
3189 wrote on Dec 8, 2009 7:39 AM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 7, 2009 9:58 AM:
ser21 wrote on Dec 5, 2009 2:06 PM:
RealPride wrote on Dec 5, 2009 1:35 PM:
ser21 wrote on Dec 5, 2009 1:32 PM:
Jaksmith wrote on Dec 5, 2009 11:11 AM:
3189 wrote on Dec 5, 2009 7:52 AM:
3189 wrote on Dec 5, 2009 7:44 AM:
RealPride wrote on Dec 3, 2009 12:23 AM:
Mark M. Farinella wrote on Dec 2, 2009 2:07 PM:
pacwoman wrote on Dec 2, 2009 1:48 PM:
Mark M. Farinella wrote on Dec 2, 2009 11:24 AM:
pacwoman wrote on Dec 2, 2009 10:03 AM:
fred17b wrote on Dec 1, 2009 9:12 PM:
Jaksmith wrote on Dec 1, 2009 8:22 PM:
Pacwomen, no disrespect, but you sound like a disgruntled parent whose Son does not get playing time. Playing time is earned, it is not giving, and if you are not with the team day after day you would not know who deserves to play or not.
SBCoach, maybe the problem is we need someone who is not an Attleboro guy to come in here and turn the program around. Coach Deschenes should do Attleboro a favor and resign, we need a change and him resigning is the only way that can happen. "
Jaksmith wrote on Dec 1, 2009 8:22 PM:
2- How long do we have to wait? 20 years? It didn't take Mike Redding that long to build that program up. Coach Deschenes has had long enough and has proven year after year that he cannot win or build a program. How long has he been Head Coach? Is his 20 years up yet?
I will however give them credit for joining the Hockomock. They could do what Feehan does and play in a lower division so you can be considered a powerhouse when everyone knows if they played at the right level of competition they wouldn’t be as dominate. With that being said, I don’t look forward to the beatings we will take from the upper echelon teams of the Hockomock. "
ser21 wrote on Dec 1, 2009 7:42 PM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 1, 2009 4:19 PM:
Mark M. Farinella wrote on Dec 1, 2009 4:14 PM:
Many of you forget two things:
1 -- Without the vocational wing (whose students rarely participate in sports), Attleboro High's pool for "talent" is about the same as most of the Hockomock League schools.
2 -- What you think of as "talent" and what the real situation is are often two different things. You see one or two kids with possible next-level skills, and you think all of them should be that good if a coach waves a magic wand. It doesn't happen overnight. It took Mansfield 20 years (and a doubling of the student population) to become what it is now.
I think AHS has done well to improve several of its programs over the past five years or so, given the loss of some individuals to other schools (parochial and otherwise) and what appears to be a fractured youth-sports feeder system. And what's more, I find AHS athletes to be very respectful and hard-working. You should be proud of that.
Less bickering over unrealistic expectations would help Attleboro's transition to the Hockomock League instead of hinder it. Remember, these are high school kids, not pros.
Or, you folks could take up a collection and see if Charlie Weis is available. He might actually be able to succeed at the high school level. "
pacwoman wrote on Dec 1, 2009 3:23 PM:
RealPride wrote on Dec 1, 2009 9:38 AM:
sbcoach wrote on Dec 1, 2009 9:23 AM:
tomriddle wrote on Nov 30, 2009 10:54 AM:
pacwoman wrote on Nov 30, 2009 8:58 AM:
ser21 wrote on Nov 29, 2009 9:55 PM:
RealPride wrote on Nov 29, 2009 12:36 PM:
enuffalready wrote on Nov 28, 2009 10:18 AM:
Jaksmith wrote on Nov 27, 2009 5:23 PM:
Attleboro coach has been there a long time and has done nothing with all the talent that has been through HIS program. It is time for a change and oh how I wish they would make a change but somehow I doubt it. How many more years does he get of mediocrity ??? "
macdog wrote on Nov 27, 2009 4:07 AM: