ATTLEBORO — A proposal to temporarily ban shops that sell recreational marijuana is before the city council.

Council President Frank Cook asked for the ban to give the city time to write an ordinance that would regulate the shops which were legalized in a statewide ballot last year.

While the sale of recreational marijuana was approved by voters, neither the state nor the city has issued regulations to govern the business.

Without an ordinance that regulates sale of the drug at the local level, a pot shop could open up on Park Street in the center of town or some other business district, which may not please residents, Cook said.

“One of these businesses could move in and set up downtown and we’d have no say in it,” he said. “All this is doing is protecting the city while we develop an appropriate ordinance.”

Cook said he’s trying to avoid a situation like that which occurred when an adult video store opened in South Attleboro and the city could do nothing to stop it because it had no rules about adult entertainment businesses.

An ordinance regulating medical marijuana limited retail and growing facilities for that business to industrial zones and imposed other restrictions.

“We’re not trying to override the will of the people, but we have a responsibility to regulate where these (businesses) can go,” Cook said.

If approved, the moratorium would remain in place through Dec. 31 of 2018.

The proposed ordinance would require the council to plan for potential impacts of the business.

The proposal, which came to the council as “new business,” from Cook was referred to the ordinance committee headed up by councilor Jay DiLisio.

A public hearing has been scheduled for Nov. 21 at City Hall.

Usually requests to consider “new business” items like Cook’s are routinely assigned to a committee for discussion, but this one got two votes against.

Councilors Richard Conti and Sara Lynn Reynolds both voted “no.”

Conti said the temporary ban isn’t needed.

Meanwhile, Cook said the city could ban the shops, but that would have to be decided by city voters because the statewide question was approved in Attleboro.

City voters backed the sale of recreational marijuana with 57 percent of the vote which translates to 11,602 “yes” votes and 8,806 “no” votes.

Other area communities have imposed a moratorium or banned the sale of the drug for recreational use altogether.

Foxboro banned it last spring and Mansfield imposed a moratorium on pot shops.

George W. Rhodes can be reached at 508-236-0432.

Recommended for you

(2) comments

rynrd3

I believe that Attleboro NEEDS a recreational and a medical cannabis dispensary, if not more than one of each. Lets face it, Attleboro could use the extra revenue, and If I'm going to be honest, the majority of residents in this city would most likely use cannabis at some point, as science has already shown us that it is far safer than Alcohol, which, despite what anyone says, is also a drug. One that can be quite deadly. So, Attleboro, your choice. Do we continue to allow it to be sold on the streets, where your children could end up using laced cannabis from sketchy dealers, or would you rather live in a place where, you know, even if they do use Cannabis, it will be tested for purity and will not have contaminants? I personally can say that if a teenager or even an adult, wants to use Cannabis, they will. The law does not effect this, as people will still sell it on the street, and people will still purchase it from the street. So why would we allow it to be sold on the street, when instead we could regulate it and generate profit for the city itself to better our education, health and infrastructure? If people are able to be ensured that what they are purchasing is safe for consumption, then I believe that this is the way to go! Can you imagine if your child wanted to use cannabis, so they bought from the streets, and they ended up overdosing or something because the cannabis was contaminated with something like heroin or fentanyl? In my mind, that is a whole lot scarier than a business that tests for purity and safety. Lets move past this "reefer madness" thing.

rynrd3

I also would like to point out that, in places where recreational cannabis is legal, there has been a decline in opioid related deaths, as people have begun to choose cannabis instead of the highly addictive pills that pharmaceutical companies sell. In my opinion, pharma companies are the real problem. Not cannabis. 0 deaths from cannabis. Opioid deaths are the most prevalent killer of people under age 50.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.